Does your daughter not have a family she can rely on if need be? I am not saying women should be totally dependent on men but they should need a man. A man needs a woman for what she brings to a relationship because a man cannot be complete without a woman and a woman needs a man. That is the ideal relationship dynamic. Women of today are so caught up in trying not to need men that they refuse to give into the vulnerability and passion of what love is because they don't want to need a man. The love is hallow and lacks intensity.

Education is not the solution it is actually the problem. Our education system is entirely subverted by marxist ideology at the moment. It isn't educating people. We're busy teaching ethnocentric math and chemistry from a feminist perspective. It is out of control because the funding for education has been pushing these agendas. Education is a propaganda machine that creates mindless drones not free thinkers. Women are getting degrees in human resources and then becoming LGBTQ anxiety coaches at the workplace or degrees in alternative herstory and pushing papers as an admin assistant. We don't need to be sending women or men to these institutions and wasting substantial resources to teach people pure propaganda.

Learning is good so encourage people to read books and learn on their own. Academia and the educational institutions are part of the problem right now. We should defund public education entirely. Ideally, women should home-school children rather than send kids to public schools. Religious schools and charter schools are much better than public schools.

Also, I disagree that women can be feminine and in STEM generally speaking. I have met exceptions but the working world forces women to adopt masculine qualities because the working world is highly competitive and those who act more like men find success easier. That's why women tend to dominate certain areas of the working world like child-care, nursing etc... where the jobs require less masculine personas because naturally women don't want to be like men even if this sort of equality is being pushed. Many women I talk to discuss how they have two personas. Their masculine work persona and their feminine personal persona. They are forced to be two-faced while men can always just be themselves. This is not a good development for women or men. No matter how good women think they are at moving between the two roles, the masculine working world shapes their personalities and it shapes their personality in a manner that makes them less attractive to men. This makes it harder for the women to find men and it makes it harder for men to find women since the supply of attractive women is less.

I disagree with you on if I had a daughter. I would be perfectly happy going back to a time where the father and husband decided for the woman. I would end woman's suffrage and reinstate defined gender roles as men being the providers with women being the nurturers in society. It worked for 1000s of years before. This is extreme and I'm willing to find a modern solution. The problem in my opinion is the lack of veneration of the housewife. As someone once put it: "in the 60s we had a bunch of tomboys masquerading as housewives. Now we have a bunch of housewives masquerading as tomboys." Equality is not the solution. The solution is embracing the differences between masculinity and femininity which means one's outcome in regards to resources/career are likely going to be different.

Let's put it this way. You did find a man despite having nothing but your beauty. That's normal because that's truly what men value not education. You didn't luck out, you actually were as good as you needed to be and there was much less risk than you perceived. Meanwhile now we have a bunch of single education women that can take care of themselves but they can't find husbands and you have a bunch of single men who can't find wives. Why? Because what we've promoted in society isn't truly what men or women want but it's what they are taught.

Does your daughter not have a family she can rely on if need be? I am not saying women should be totally dependent on men but they should need a man. A man needs a woman for what she brings to a relationship because a man cannot be complete without a woman and a woman needs a man. That is the ideal relationship dynamic. Women of today are so caught up in trying not to need men that they refuse to give into the vulnerability and passion of what love is because they don't want to need a man. The love is hallow and lacks intensity.

Education is not the solution it is actually the problem. Our education system is entirely subverted by marxist ideology at the moment. It isn't educating people. We're busy teaching ethnocentric math and chemistry from a feminist perspective. It is out of control because the funding for education has been pushing these agendas. Education is a propaganda machine that creates mindless drones not free thinkers. Women are getting degrees in human resources and then becoming LGBTQ anxiety coaches at the workplace or degrees in alternative herstory and pushing papers as an admin assistant. We don't need to be sending women or men to these institutions and wasting substantial resources to teach people pure propaganda.

Learning is good so encourage people to read books and learn on their own. Academia and the educational institutions are part of the problem right now. We should defund public education entirely. Ideally, women should home-school children rather than send kids to public schools. Religious schools and charter schools are much better than public schools.

Also, I disagree that women can be feminine and in STEM generally speaking. I have met exceptions but the working world forces women to adopt masculine qualities because the working world is highly competitive and those who act more like men find success easier. That's why women tend to dominate certain areas of the working world like child-care, nursing etc... where the jobs arguably are less masculine in nature. Many women I talk to discuss how they have two personas. Their masculine work persona and their feminine personal persona. They are forced to be two-faced while men can always just be themselves. This is not a good development for women or men. No matter how good women think they are at moving between the two roles, the masculine working world shapes their personalities and it shapes their personality in a manner that makes them less attractive to men. This makes it harder for the women to find men and it makes it harder for men to find women since the supply of attractive women is less.

I disagree with you on if I had a daughter. I would be perfectly happy going back to a time where the father and husband decided for the woman. I would end woman's suffrage and reinstate defined gender roles as men being the providers with women being the nurturers in society. It worked for 1000s of years before. This is extreme and I'm willing to find a modern solution. The problem in my opinion is the lack of veneration of the housewife. As someone once put it: "in the 60s we had a bunch of tomboys masquerading as housewives. Now we have a bunch of housewives masquerading as tomboys." Equality is not the solution. The solution is embracing the differences between masculinity and femininity which means one's outcome in regards to resources/career are likely going to be different.

Let's put it this way. You did find a man despite having nothing but your beauty. That's normal because that's truly what men value not education. You didn't luck out, you actually were as good as you needed to be and there was much less risk than you perceived. Meanwhile now we have a bunch of single education women that can take care of themselves but they can't find husbands and you have a bunch of single men who can't find wives. Why? Because what we've promoted in society isn't truly what men or women want but it's what they are taught.

Does your daughter not have a family she can rely on if need be? I am not saying women should be totally dependent on men but they should need a man. A man needs a woman for what she brings to a relationship because a man cannot be complete without a woman and a woman needs a man. That is the ideal relationship dynamic. Women of today are so caught up in trying not to need men that they refuse to give into the vulnerability and passion of what love is because they don't want to need a man. The love is hallow and lacks intensity.

Education is not the solution it is actually the problem. Our education system is entirely subverted by marxist ideology at the moment. It isn't educating people. We're busy teaching ethnocentric math and chemistry from a feminist perspective. It is out of control because the funding for education has been pushing these agendas. Education is a propaganda machine that creates mindless drones not free thinkers. Women are getting degrees in human resources and then becoming LGBTQ anxiety at the workplace managers or degrees in alternative herstory and pushing papers as an admin assistant. We don't need to be sending women or men to these institutions and wasting substantial resources to teach people pure propaganda.

Learning is good so encourage people to read books and learn on their own. Academia and the educational institutions are part of the problem right now. We should defund public education entirely. Ideally, women should home-school children rather than send kids to public schools. Religious schools and charter schools are much better than public schools.

Also, I disagree that women can be feminine and in STEM generally speaking. I have met exceptions but the working world forces women to adopt masculine qualities because the working world is highly competitive and those who act more like men find success easier. That's why women tend to dominate certain areas of the working world like child-care, nursing etc... where the jobs arguably are less masculine in nature. Many women I talk to discuss how they have two personas. Their masculine work persona and their feminine personal persona. They are forced to be two-faced while men can always just be themselves. This is not a good development for women or men. No matter how good women think they are at moving between the two roles, the masculine working world shapes their personalities and it shapes their personality in a manner that makes them less attractive to men. This makes it harder for the women to find men and it makes it harder for men to find women since the supply of attractive women is less.

I disagree with you on if I had a daughter. I would be perfectly happy going back to a time where the father and husband decided for the woman. I would end woman's suffrage and reinstate defined gender roles as men being the providers with women being the nurturers in society. It worked for 1000s of years before. This is extreme and I'm willing to find a modern solution. The problem in my opinion is the lack of veneration of the housewife. As someone once put it: "in the 60s we had a bunch of tomboys masquerading as housewives. Now we have a bunch of housewives masquerading as tomboys." Equality is not the solution. The solution is embracing the differences between masculinity and femininity which means one's outcome in regards to resources/career are likely going to be different.

Let's put it this way. You did find a man despite having nothing but your beauty. That's normal because that's truly what men value not education. You didn't luck out, you actually were as good as you needed to be and there was much less risk than you perceived. Meanwhile now we have a bunch of single education women that can take care of themselves but they can't find husbands and you have a bunch of single men who can't find wives. Why? Because what we've promoted in society isn't truly what men or women want but it's what they are taught.

Does your daughter not have a family she can rely on if need be? I am not saying women should be totally dependent on men but they should need a man. A man needs a woman for what she brings to a relationship because a man cannot be complete without a woman and a woman needs a man. That is the ideal relationship dynamic. Women of today are so caught up in trying not to need men that they refuse to give into the vulnerability and passion of what love is because they don't want to need a man. The love is hallow and lacks intensity.

Education is not the solution it is actually the problem. Our education system is entirely subverted by marxist ideology at the moment. It isn't educating people. We're busy teaching ethnocentric math and chemistry from a feminist perspective. It is out of control because the funding for education has been pushing these agendas. Education is a propaganda machine that creates mindless drones not free thinkers. Women are getting degrees in human resources and then becoming LGBTQ anxiety at the workplace managers or degrees in alternative herstory and pushing papers as an admin assistant. We don't need to be sending women or men to these institutions and wasting substantial resources to teach people pure propaganda.

Learning is good so encourage people to read books and learn on their own. Academia and the educational institutions are part of the problem right now. We should defund public education entirely. Ideally, women should home-school children rather than send kids to public schools. Religious schools and charter schools are much better than public schools.

Also, I disagree that women can be feminine and in STEM generally speaking. I have met exceptions but the working world forces women to adopt masculine qualities because the working world is highly competitive and those who act more like men find success easier. That's why women tend to dominate certain areas of the working world like child-care, nursing etc... where the jobs arguably are less masculine in nature. Many women I talk to discuss how they have two personas. Their masculine work persona and their feminine personal persona. They are forced to be two-faced while men can always just be themselves. This is not a good development for women or men. No matter how good women think they are at moving between the two roles, the masculine working world shapes their personalities and it shapes their personality in a manner that makes them less attractive to men. This makes it harder for the women to find men and it makes it harder for men to find women since the supply of attractive women is less.

I disagree with you on if I had a daughter. I would be perfectly happy going back to a time where the father and husband decided for the woman. I would end woman's suffrage and reinstate defined gender roles as men being the providers with women being the nurturers in society. It worked for 1000s of years before. This is extreme and I'm willing to find a modern solution. The problem in my opinion is the lack of veneration of the housewife. As someone once put it: "in the 60s we had a bunch of tomboys masquerading as housewives. Now we have a bunch of housewives masquerading as tomboys." Equality is not the solution. The solution is embracing the differences between masculinity and femininity which means one's outcome in regards to resources/career are likely going to be different.

Let's put it this way. You did find a man despite having nothing but your beauty. That's normal because that's truly what men value not education. You didn't luck out, you actually were as good as you needed to be and there was much less risk than you perceived. Meanwhile now we have a bunch of single education women that can take care of themselves but they can't find husbands and you have a bunch of single men who can't find wives. Why? Because what we've promoted in society isn't truly what men or women want.