Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES Front All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: Malpractice data

No. 150k isn't a lot when you take into account the entire population.

That's under .04% of the population. Not 4%, but .04%.

That would have been part of my original point.

It's only 3x normal flu deaths and we honestly do not know if anything we have done has hurt or helped when compared to other countries that chose alternative methods.

EDIT: Malpractice is closer to 250k deaths per year according the first article covering it via the search engine that must not be named and CNBC.

So honestly, wu-flu isn't close to even malpractice numbers yet either.

208 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

No. 150k isn't a lot when you take into account the entire population.

That's under .04% of the population. Not 4%, but .04%.

That would have been part of my original point.

It's only 3x normal flu deaths and we honestly do not know if anything we have done has hurt or helped when compared to other countries that chose alternative methods.

EDIT: first result for malpractice deaths inside the US links a CNBC article stating they are close to 250k. So it's actually significantly less than malpractice as well.

208 days ago
1 score