Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

They don't seek to replace men, they seek to gain male authority without any of the responsibility. They're children LARPing as independent adults. But make no mistake, without womens' only grants, affirmative action, discrimination lawsuits, and gender quotas, the workforce would be entirely dominated by men. Men are allowing themselves to be displaced for the sake of propping up this egalitarian myth.

One of the biggest red pills is when you realize that society cares more about women's comfort than men's lives.

Hundreds of thousands of men die in wars (many of those are 18 year olds drafted into service), and although we throw a parade a couple of times a year, we keep doing it over and over... but when the slightest inconveniences are placed on women it becomes a national crisis that society obsesses over until it's "rectified" - even if that solution is grossly unfair (such as giving female soccer players the same salary and the same recognition as world-class male players, even though the women would get crushed in any high school boys tournament). If we treated women as being disposable to the same extent that we treat men as disposable, in the 20th Century (up to and including the Vietnam era) 18-year-old girls would have been drafted as breeding partners for the soldiers who were drafted to fight.

The fact that such a thing is utterly inconceivable tells you everything there is to know about how strong female privilege has always been.

With such preferential treatment already in place, feminism never had a leg to stand on. Not even the first wave. But we let it happen, and now we're seeing the consequences.

257 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

They don't seek to replace men, they seek to gain male authority without any of the responsibility. They're children LARPing as independent adults. But make no mistake, without womens' only grants, affirmative action, and gender quotas, the workforce would be entirely dominated by men. Men are allowing themselves to be displaced for the sake of propping up this egalitarian myth.

One of the biggest red pills is when you realize that society cares more about women's comfort than men's lives.

Hundreds of thousands of men die in wars (many of those are 18 year olds drafted into service), and although we throw a parade a couple of times a year, we keep doing it over and over... but when the slightest inconveniences are placed on women it becomes a national crisis that society obsesses over until it's "rectified" - even if that solution is grossly unfair (such as giving female soccer players the same salary and the same recognition as world-class male players, even though the women would get crushed in any high school boys tournament). If we treated women as being disposable to the same extent that we treat men as disposable, in the 20th Century (up to and including the Vietnam era) 18-year-old girls would have been drafted as breeding partners for the soldiers who were drafted to fight.

The fact that such a thing is utterly inconceivable tells you everything there is to know about how strong female privilege has always been.

With such preferential treatment already in place, feminism never had a leg to stand on. Not even the first wave. But we let it happen, and now we're seeing the consequences.

257 days ago
1 score