No, because ideally she should be at home looking after the kids while the man is out providing for her and thus it's the man paying taxes.

If you reversed the decision by the supreme court to allow states the right to enforce restrictions on voting and made it so that net positive contribution in tax payments was a requirement, once you adjusted for all benefits received and only truly included the net positive tax payers, most women would in fact lose their right to vote.

No, because ideally she should be at home looking after the kids while the man is out providing for her and thus it's the man paying taxes.