These people are retarded. It isn’t illegal. Signatures are public records by Arizona statute. Not only that, but posting what was public info in an AZ hearing makes it even more retarded.
https://www.azleg.gov/ars/16/00161.htm
16-161. Official record of registration; federal form; reporting
A. When the registration form is filled out, signed by the elector and received by the county recorder, it shall constitute an official public record of the registration of the elector.
And lets talk about nominating petitions. Just how the fuck can someone challenge signatures without signatures being public?
Almost all voting data is public info. You can request a copy of the voter rolls. Political parties and others do this constantly. You can see who voted in each election. The voter rolls contain name and address and birthday. All of it public.
So again, back to this faggotry…what law was broken? Since when are voter signatures not public?
Edit: I should add that AZ does have a statute governing the permissible use of voter rolls/precinct signature rosters. I would argue that it is an unconstitutional prior restraint. But aside from that, it simply doesn’t apply here because she isn’t publishing the voter rolls or precinct rosters. If memory serves me correctly, she was retweeting someone else that tweeted that from the AZ senate hearing. Whether it was a retweet or originated from her, it still isn’t illegal. Not even close.
If SCOTUS struck down a prior restraint on the NYT for the pentagon papers - something that would carry far greater implications for the nation than AZ voter signatures - why would they uphold this bullshit statute?
These people are retarded. It isn’t illegal. Signatures are public records by Arizona statute. Not only that, but posting what was public info in an AZ hearing makes it even more retarded.
https://www.azleg.gov/ars/16/00161.htm
16-161. Official record of registration; federal form; reporting
A. When the registration form is filled out, signed by the elector and received by the county recorder, it shall constitute an official public record of the registration of the elector.
And lets talk about nominating petitions. Just how the fuck can someone challenge signatures without signatures being public?
Almost all voting data is public info. You can request a copy of the voter rolls. Political parties and others do this constantly. You can see who voted in each election. The voter rolls contain name and address and birthday. All of it public.
So again, back to this faggotry…what law was broken? Since when are voter signatures not public?