The choice of the word "inappropriate" is very interesting. Who defines inappropriate? Maybe it's just me -- but if you have evidence to indict a criminal running for office -- I think doing so is entirely appropriate.

The left have been playing with dictionary definitions for a long time. And when they don't have a term they like -- they create new words.

Funny thing about Mr. Barr -- he tends to gravitate toward classical definitions.

So to him -- inappropriate would mean just that. To my knowledge -- there is no law that prevents the indictment of an individual running for office if there is sufficient evidence that he/she has committed a crime. Therefore, it would be appropriate to indict such a person, wouldn't it?

The choice of the word "inappropriate" is very interesting. Who defines inappropriate? Maybe it's just me -- but if you have evidence to indict a criminal running for office -- I think doing so is entirely appropriate.

The left have been playing with dictionary definitions for a long time. And when they don't have a term they like -- they create new words.

Funny thing about Mr. Barr -- he tends to gravitate toward classical definitions.

So to him -- inappropriate would mean just that. To my knowledge -- there is no law that prevents the indictment of an individual running for office if there is sufficient evidence that he/she has committed one. Therefore, it would be appropriate to indict such a person, wouldn't it?