He means inappropriate in that he doesn't want to be seen as influencing the election. But it's only "inappropriate" in the sense of politics, not as a matter of law. Which is why what he says is soo unnerving, because even inaction influences politics. You can't say that you're going to stay out of politics, then dictate your lacks of actions based on politics. Not taking actions because of politics, even if only as a way to say you're staying away from politics, is still an action dictated by politics.

Or in other words, just like prosecuting someone during an election can be seen as election meddling, not prosecuting someone because of an election is still an action based on politics, that is also technically election meddling. And in two senses; firstly being that it's allowing elections to dictate the wheels of justice, and secondly, it's allowing the people who committed crimes against a person in the election, even going as far as to try to frame the person for crimes, to have the lack of their facing justice, which affects the election.

So as much as they say arresting people would affect the election, not arresting people also has an effect.

The only course of action for Barr, is to follow the law, and completely ignore the politics. That's the only way he can be on the right side of things at the end of the day.

He means inappropriate in that he doesn't want to be seen as influencing the election. But it's only "inappropriate" in the sense of politics, not as a matter of law. Which is why what he says is soo unnerving, because even inaction influences politics. You can't say that you're going to stay out of politics, then dictate your lacks of actions based on politics. Not taking actions because of politics, even if only as a way to say you're staying away from politics, is still an action dictated by politics.

Or in other words, just like prosecuting someone during an election can be seen as election meddling, not prosecuting someone because of an election is still an action based on politics, that is also technically election meddling. And in two senses; firstly being that it's allowing elections to dictate the wheels of justice, and secondly, it's allowing the people who committed crimes against a person in the election, even going as far as to try to frame the person for crimes, to have the lack of their facing justice, which affects the election.

So as much as they say arresting people would affect the election, not arresting people also has an effect on the election.

The only course of action for Barr, is to follow the law, and completely ignore the politics. That's the only way he can be on the right side of things at the end of the day.

He means inappropriate in that he doesn't want to be seen as influencing the election. But it's only "inappropriate" in the sense of politics, not as a matter of law. Which is why what he says is soo unnerving, because even inaction influences politics. You can't say that you're going to stay out of politics, then dictate your lacks of actions based on politics. Not taking actions because of politics, even if only as a way to say you're staying away from politics, is still an action dictated by politics.

Or in other words, just like prosecuting someone during an election can be seen as election meddling, not prosecuting someone because of an election is still an action based on politics, that is also technically election meddling. And in two senses; firstly being that it's allowing elections to dictate the wheels of justice, and secondly, it's allowing the people who committed crimes against a person in the election, even going as far as to try to frame the person for crimes, to have the lack of their facing justice, affect the election.

So as much as they say arresting people would affect the election, not arresting people also has an effect on the election.

The only course of action for Barr, is to follow the law, and completely ignore the politics. That's the only way he can be on the right side of things at the end of the day.

He means inappropriate in that he doesn't want to be seen as influencing the election. But it's only "inappropriate" in the sense of politics, not as a matter of law. Which is why what he says is soo unnerving, because even inaction influences politics. You can't say that you're going to stay out of politics, then dictate your actions based on politics. Not taking actions because of politics, even if only as a way to say you're staying away from politics, is still an action dictated by politics.

Or in other words, just like prosecuting someone during an election can be seen as election meddling, not prosecuting someone because of an election is still an action based on politics, that is also technically election meddling. And in two senses; firstly being that it's allowing elections to dictate the wheels of justice, and secondly, it's allowing the people who committed crimes against a person in the election, even going as far as to try to frame the person for crimes, to have the lack of their facing justice, affect the election.

So as much as they say arresting people would affect the election, not arresting people also has an effect on the election.

The only course of action for Barr, is to follow the law, and completely ignore the politics. That's the only way he can be on the right side of things at the end of the day.