Show me proof of this company immediately taking action.

AMN acknowledged that this individual worked for them in some capacity. That's a big deal.
-AMN could be lying about details, just to prevent this from destroying their corporation.
-Anyone with access to the facility or the inner workings of it could cause harm.
-The investigation is not one for AMN to conduct themselves, given the conflict of interest.
-AMN provided no resolution to this case.

I don't think it's harassment to respectfully ask this company for an update. I said nothing untruthful about AMN in this post. I conveyed the response they gave me. If their response elicits a negative reaction then that's on them.

Show me proof of this company immediately taking action.

AMN acknowledged that this individual worked for them in some capacity. That's a big deal.
-AMN could be lying about details, just to prevent this from destroying their corporation.
-Anyone with access to the facility or the inner workings of it could cause harm.
-The investigation is not one for AMN to conduct themselves, given the conflict of interest.
-AMN provided no resolution to this case.

I don't think it's harassment to respectfully ask this company for an update. I said nothing untruthful about AMN in this post. I conveyed the response they gave me.

I understand where you're coming from.

AMN acknowledged that this individual worked for them in some capacity. That's a big deal.
-AMN could be lying about details, just to prevent this from destroying their corporation.
-Anyone with access to the facility or the inner workings of it could cause harm.
-The investigation is not one for AMN to conduct themselves, given the conflict of interest.
-AMN provided no resolution to this case.

I don't think it's harassment to respectfully ask this company for an update and post the response that was given.

I understand where you're coming from.

AMN acknowledged that this individual worked for them in some capacity. That's a big deal.
-AMN could be lying about details, just to prevent this from destroying their corporation.
-Anyone with access to the facility or the inner workings of it could cause harm.
-The investigation is not one for AMN to conduct themselves, given the conflict of interest.
-AMN provided no resolution to this case.

I don't think it's harassment to respectfully ask this company for an update.

I understand where you're coming from.

AMN acknowledged that this individual worked for them in some capacity. That's a big deal.
-AMN could be lying about details, just to prevent this from destroying their corporation.
-Anyone with access to the facility or the infrastructure could cause harm.
-The investigation is not one for AMN to conduct themselves, given the conflict of interest.
-AMN provided no resolution to this case.

I don't think it's harassment to respectfully ask this company for an update.