I don’t believe the argument is too simplistic, it’s merely an observation about the psychology of what the left justifies and prioritizes; followed through to the end. I mean really, you have to ask yourself how the left can justify burning down the livelihoods of innocent people over the death of George Floyd. Seems like certain lives > other lives; which is the exact argument pro-abortionists make? Doesn’t it follow that someone who values the life of the mother over the child would not take an “all lives matter” stance? Seems logical.

The left says “Black Live Matter” and a woman was gunned down for saying “All Lives Matter” - why wouldn’t you assume “all lives matter” includes Black Lives? What’s the ultimate result of valuing one life over the other; isn’t it just death? All I‘m saying is that we need to make room for everyone, including children. BLM seems to think there’s only room for their side just like the Left seems to think there’s only room for one side (the mother). If you follow the premise to its conclusion, its a logical progression of ideas with results to match.

Here’s my response to the “but it’s too simplistic” phrase: “2+2=5”.

If you complicate things enough you can justify things like men can be women and gender is a construct. If you complicate things enough, you can start defending absurd ideas. The results of such absurd ideas are coming to fruition in our generation in front of our eyes.

I have to point you to the Virginia Governor Ralph Northam that stated: ‘ “If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen,” he continued. “The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”’

There is definitely a correlation between abortion and infanticide and I would argue that it has to do with the value someone places on human life.

As you’ve said, due to sociopathy or psychopathy if serial killers don’t give a toss about abortions then I would argue that it says something about the sociopathy or psychopathy of the left - which is evidenced by everything going on right now, especially the violence, murder, mayhem, and lawlessness coming from the left. Their actions fall in line with their beliefs on the value life, there certainly is a correlation and plenty of evidence.

Out of the millions of abortion performed every year, only a fraction of that is due to rape, the rest are merely a convenience issue. I’m advocating sexual conservatism and responsibility. The left promotes sexual heathenism while being pro-abortion; I just have to ask at what point is responsibility ever something promoted by the left? Is their response to procreation of life as simple as a one night stand and aborting it? Really? We’re not talking about a small statistic of non-rape abortions. This is the crux of the issue even though the left always frames it as a rape issue. Roe vs Wade was historically based on a lie; the biography of the women who the Democrats used to pass Roe vs Wade explains the lies it was based off of (and her part in that lie). Abortion clinics are placed in predominately Black area because the women who championed abortions was using it to wipe out the Black communities. Pro-Abortion is not merely about rape.

My issue is with the acceptance and promotion of culturally and socially irresponsible behavior. Promote sexual promiscuity and be surprised that there’s a #metoo movement? Isn’t promoting sexual promiscuity merely shuffling women to less than ideal groups of men? The womens’ sexual freedom movement, all it did was hurt women in the end and encourage them to kill their own children. This acceptance of sexual promiscuity is merely supplying naive women to creepy men, which opens up more avenues for the sexual abuse of women, and the #metoo movement thereafter have made the good men (the men who are worried about their reputation) afraid to be near women. It’s the sexual predators who are thrilled when women don’t care about one-night stands, more opportunities.

Even with the acceptance of sexual promiscuity, the average man is now afraid to be near a women. The men who value their livelihoods are limiting their interaction with women, and in a strange way being forced to be sexually conservative because of the left (which is honestly not what I expected would happen, but it’s logical). Protecting your reputation against sexual accusations = sexual conservatism.

There are also many children who have had rough lives, but why take away the opportunity for that child’s chance at life? What do you have to say to the children who were adopted into families and are doing fine? Do they deserve a chance at life or not?

Filled orphanages in Romania and pedophile plans are leaps you’ve made, not I. Here’s my solution for the pedophile problem (which Hollywood is filled with), how about we not put pedophiles in charge of orphanages? How about we punish the pedophile by imprisoning them while we let innocent get a chance at life? People are born into difficult situations, I don’t think we should kill them for it. To equate a less than ideal start in life as a mercy killing of sorts is frankly atrocious. Blacks born in the hood have a tough freaking life too, is that why abortion clinic are always near the hood? If Black Lives Mattered, what about the children who are aborted? The left stance has so much cognitive dissonance it’s very difficult for me to follow.

How about we give the child a chance at life and you might be surprised at how well they end up doing?

I’m not for state-run orphanages, but I believe we need to support and promote adoption in the same manner (if no, more so) than we do Abortion clinics, with the same energy that MSM supports Planned Parenthood - create awareness, accept donations to orphanages, run regular wellness checks by the government and have a free press that would report any abuse and not run cover for them (like they do Planned Parenthood). There’s a better solution than Abortion.

There is one area where I do sit back and take a pause, which is the “forced birth” scenario. I would hope that culturally we all see value to life, that we punish rapists severely, and children are given a chance to succeed and define what their own life means to them. That the stigma of being a “rape child” would go away completely just like the way the stigma of being a “gay man” has been done away. The women who make these life-affirming decisions should be celebrated and respected for their strength in the same manner IF NOT MORE than the ones aborting them, they should be given a parade bigger than the LGBT parades; but a society like that is only plausible if we value human life at it’s fundamental core. A human is a human is a human.

That’s my take/observation on the whole matter. We can agree to disagree but the whole “Christ almighty with all this pro-life going on in the Donald forum”, Trump is Pro-Life. Pro-Life people have been congregating outside of the Leftists bubble for decades despite the MSM attempt to stamp us out. Let us speak for ONCE, its not like you have the whole of Hollywood, MSM, and my tax paying dollars supporting your stances.

I don’t believe the argument is too simplistic, it’s merely an observation about the psychology of what the left justifies and prioritizes; followed through to the end. I mean really, you have to ask yourself how the left can justify burning down the livelihoods of innocent people over the death of George Floyd. Seems like certain lives > other lives; which is the exact argument pro-abortionists make? Doesn’t it follow that someone who values the life of the mother over the child would not take an “all lives matter” stance? Seems logical.

The left says “Black Live Matter” and a woman was gunned down for saying “All Lives Matter” - why wouldn’t you assume “all lives matter” includes Black Lives? What’s the ultimate result of valuing one life over the other; isn’t it just death? All I‘m saying is that we need to make room for everyone, including children. BLM seems to think there’s only room for their side just like the Left seems to think there’s only room for one side (the mother). If you follow the premise to its conclusion, its a logical progression of ideas with results to match.

Here’s my response to the “but it’s too simplistic” phrase: “2+2=5”.

If you complicate things enough you can justify things like men can be women and gender is a construct. If you complicate things enough, you can start defending absurd ideas. The results of such absurd ideas are coming to fruition in our generation in front of our eyes.

I have to point you to the Virginia Governor Ralph Northam that stated: ‘ “If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen,” he continued. “The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”’

There is definitely a correlation between abortion and infanticide and I would argue that it has to do with the value someone places on human life.

As you’ve said, due to sociopathy or psychopathy if serial killers don’t give a toss about abortions then I would argue that it says something about the sociopathy or psychopathy of the left - which is evidenced by everything going on right now, especially the violence, murder, mayhem, and lawlessness coming from the left. Their actions fall in line with their beliefs on the value life, there certainly is a correlation and plenty of evidence.

Out of the millions of abortion performed every year, only a fraction of that is due to rape, the rest are merely a convenience issue. I’m advocating sexual conservatism and responsibility. The left promotes sexual heathenism while being pro-abortion; I just have to ask at what point is responsibility ever something promoted by the left? Is their response to procreation of life as simple as a one night stand and aborting it? Really? We’re not talking about a small statistic of non-rape abortions. This is the crux of the issue even though the left always frames it as a rape issue. Roe vs Wade was historically based on a lie; the biography of the women who the Democrats used to pass Roe vs Wade explains the lies it was based off of (and her part in that lie). Abortion clinics are placed in predominately Black area because the women who championed abortions was using it to wipe out the Black communities. Pro-Abortion is not merely about rape.

My issue is with the acceptance and promotion of culturally and socially irresponsible behavior. Promote sexual promiscuity and be surprised that there’s a #metoo movement? Isn’t promoting sexual promiscuity merely shuffling women to less than ideal groups of men? The womens’ sexual freedom movement, all it did was hurt women in the end and encourage them to kill their own children. This acceptance of sexual promiscuity is merely supplying naive women to creepy men, which opens up more avenues for the sexual abuse of women, and the #metoo movement thereafter have made the good men (the men who are worried about their reputation) afraid to be near women. It’s the sexual predators who are thrilled when women don’t care about one-night stands, not the good men who want a wife and family.

Even with the acceptance of sexual promiscuity, the average man is now afraid to be near a women. The men who value their livelihoods are limiting their interaction with women, and in a strange way being forced to be sexually conservative because of the left (which is honestly not what I expected would happen, but it makes perfect sense). Protecting your reputation against sexual accusations = sexual conservatism.

There are also many children who have had rough lives, but why take away the opportunity for that child’s chance at life? What do you have to say to the children who were adopted into families and are doing fine? Do they deserve a chance at life or not?

Filled orphanages in Romania and pedophile plans are leaps you’ve made, not I. Here’s my solution for the pedophile problem (which Hollywood is filled with), how about we not put pedophiles in charge of orphanages? How about we punish the pedophile by imprisoning them while we let innocent get a chance at life? People are born into difficult situations, I don’t think we should kill them for it. To equate a less than ideal start in life as a mercy killing of sorts is frankly atrocious. Blacks born in the hood have a tough freaking life too, is that why abortion clinic are always near the hood? If Black Lives Mattered, what about the children who are aborted? The left stance has so much cognitive dissonance it’s very difficult for me to follow.

How about we give the child a chance at life and you might be surprised at how well they end up doing.

I’m not for state-run orphanages, but I believe we need to support and promote adoption in the same manner (if no, more so) than we do Abortion clinics, with the same energy that MSM supports Planned Parenthood - create awareness, accept donations to orphanages, run regular wellness checks by the government and have a free press that would report any abuse and not run cover for them (like they do Planned Parenthood). There’s a better solution than Abortion.

There is one area where I do sit back and take a pause, which is the “forced birth” scenario. I would hope that culturally we all see value to life, that we punish rapists severely, and children are given a chance to succeed and define what their own life means to them. That the stigma of being a “rape child” would go away completely just like the way the stigma of being a “gay man” has been done away with (by the left). The women who make these life-affirming decisions should be celebrated and respected for their strength in the same manner IF NOT MORE than the ones aborting them, they should be given a parade bigger than the LGBT parades; but a society like that is only plausible if we value human life at it’s fundamental core. A human is a human is a human.

That’s my take/observation on the whole matter. We can agree to disagree but the whole “Christ almighty with all this pro-life going on in the Donald forum”, Trump is Pro-Life. Pro-Life people have been congregating outside of the Leftists bubble for decades despite the MSM attempt to stamp us out. Let us speak for ONCE, its not like you have the whole of Hollywood, MSM, and my tax paying dollars supporting your stances.

I don’t believe the argument is too simplistic, it’s merely an observation about the psychology of what the left justifies and prioritizes; followed through to the end. I mean really, you have to ask yourself how the left can justify burning down the livelihoods of innocent people over the death of George Floyd. Seems like certain lives > other lives; which is the exact argument pro-abortionists make? Doesn’t it follow that someone who values the life of the mother over the child would not take an “all lives matter” stance? Seems logical.

The left says “Black Live Matter” and a woman was gunned down for saying “All Lives Matter” - why wouldn’t you assume “all lives matter” includes Black Lives? What’s the ultimate result of valuing one life over the other; isn’t it just death? All I‘m saying is that we need to make room for everyone, including children. BLM seems to think there’s only room for their side just like the Left seems to think there’s only room for one side (the mother). If you follow the premise to its conclusion, its a logical progression of ideas with results to match.

Here’s my response to the “but it’s too simplistic” phrase: “2+2=5”.

If you complicate things enough you can justify things like men can be women and gender is a construct. If you complicate things enough, you can start defending absurd ideas. The results of such absurd ideas are coming to fruition in our generation in front of our eyes.

I have to point you to the Virginia Governor Ralph Northam that stated: ‘ “If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen,” he continued. “The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”’

There is definitely a correlation between abortion and infanticide and I would argue that it has to do with the value someone places on human life.

As you’ve said, due to sociopathy or psychopathy if serial killers don’t give a toss about abortions then I would argue that it says something about the sociopathy or psychopathy of the left - which is evidenced by everything going on right now, especially the violence, murder, mayhem, and lawlessness coming from the left. Their actions fall in line with their beliefs on the value life, there certainly is a correlation and plenty of evidence.

Out of the millions of abortion performed every year, only a fraction of that is due to rape, the rest are merely a convenience issue. I’m advocating sexual conservatism and responsibility. The left promotes sexual heathenism while being pro-abortion; I just have to ask at what point is responsibility ever something promoted by the left? Is their response to procreation of life as simple as a one night stand and aborting it? Really? We’re not talking about a small statistic of non-rape abortions. This is the crux of the issue even though the left always frames it as a rape issue. Roe vs Wade was historically based on a lie; the biography of the women who the Democrats used to pass Roe vs Wade explains the lies it was based off of (and her part in that lie). Abortion clinics are placed in predominately Black area because the women who championed abortions was using it to wipe out the Black communities. Pro-Abortion is not merely about rape.

My issue is with the acceptance and promotion of culturally and socially irresponsible behavior. Promote sexual promiscuity and be surprised that there’s a #metoo movement? Isn’t promoting sexual promiscuity merely shuffling women to less than ideal groups of men? The womens’ sexual freedom movement, all it did was hurt women in the end and encourage them to kill their own children. This acceptance of sexual promiscuity is merely supplying naive women to creepy men, which opens up more avenues for the sexual abuse of women, and the #metoo movement thereafter have made the good men (the men who are worried about their reputation) afraid to be near women. It’s the sexual predators who are thrilled when women don’t care about one-night stands, not the good men who want a wife and family.

Even with the acceptance of sexual promiscuity, the average man is now afraid to be near a women. The men who value their livelihoods are limiting their interaction with women, and in a strange way being forced to be sexually conservative because of the left (which is honestly not what I expected would happen, but it makes perfect sense). Protecting your reputation against sexual accusations = sexual conservatism.

There are also many children who have had rough lives, but why take away the opportunity for that child’s chance at life? What do you have to say to the children who were adopted into families and are doing fine? Do they deserve a chance at life or not?

Filled orphanages in Romania and pedophile plans are leaps you’ve made, not I. Here’s my solution for the pedophile problem (which Hollywood is filled with), how about we not put pedophiles in charge of orphanages? How about we punish the pedophile by imprisoning them while we let innocent get a chance at life? People are born into difficult situations, I don’t think we should kill them for it. To equate a less than ideal start in life as a mercy killing of sorts is frankly atrocious. Blacks born in the hood have a tough freaking life too, is that why abortion clinic are always near the hood? If Black Lives Mattered, what about the children who are aborted? The left stance has so much cognitive dissonance it’s very difficult for me to follow.

How about we give the child a chance at life and you might be surprised at how well they end up doing.

I’m not for state-run orphanages, but I believe we need to support and promote adoption in the same manner (if no, more so) than we do Abortion clinics, with the same energy that MSM supports Planned Parenthood - create awareness, accept donations to orphanages, run regular wellness checks by the government and have a free press that would report any abuse and not run cover for them (like they do Planned Parenthood). There’s a better solution than Abortion.

There is one area where I do sit back and take a pause, which is the “forced birth” scenario. I would hope that culturally we all see value to life, that we punish rapists severely, and children are given a chance to succeed and define what their own life means to them. The women who make these life-affirming decisions should be celebrated and respected for their strength in the same manner IF NOT MORE than the ones aborting them; but a society like that is only plausible if we value human life at it’s fundamental core. A human is a human is a human.

That’s my take/observation on the whole matter. We can agree to disagree but the whole “Christ almighty with all this pro-life going on in the Donald forum”, Trump is Pro-Life. Pro-Life people have been congregating outside of the Leftists bubble for decades despite the MSM attempt to stamp us out. Let us speak for ONCE, its not like you have the whole of Hollywood, MSM, and my tax paying dollars supporting your stances.

I don’t believe the argument is too simplistic, it’s merely an observation about the psychology of what the left justifies and prioritizes; following through to the end. I mean really, you have to ask yourself how the left can justify burning down the livelihoods of innocent people over the death of George Floyd. Seems like certain lives > other lives; which is the exact argument pro-abortionists make.

The right argues that all life is important. The left says “Black Live Matter” and a woman was gunned down for saying “All Lives Matter” - I would assume that includes Black Lives. Ask yourself, what the results would be of valuing one life over the other; isn’t it just death? I‘m saying both are important and we need to make room for all life. There’s room for both, but BLM only seems to think there’s room for one (their side) just like the Left seems to with Pro-Abortion there’s only room for one (the mother).

Here’s my major gripe against “it’s too simplistic” phrase: 2+2=5 Twitter posts. If you complicate things enough you can justify things like men can be women and gender is a construct but that gay men love men and lesbian love women but gender is a construct. If you complicate things enough, you can start defending absurd ideas.

Now onto your statement “there’s not much connection between killing an infant and an abortion...” I have to point you to the Virginia Governor Ralph Northam that stated: ‘ “If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen,” he continued. “The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”’

There is definitely a correlation between abortion and infanticide and I would argue that it has to do with the value someone places on human life.

As you’ve said, due to sociopathy or psychopathy if serial killers don’t give a toss about abortions then I would argue that it says something about the sociopathy or psychopathy of the left - which is evidenced by everything going on right now, especially the violence, murder, mayhem, and lawlessness coming from the left. Their actions fall in life with their belief on the value life, there certainly is a correlation and plenty of evidence.

Out of the millions of abortion performed every year, only a fraction of that is due to rape, the rest are merely a convenience issue. I’m advocating sexual conservatism and responsibility. The left promotes sexual heathenism while being pro-abortion; is their response to procreation of life as simple as a one night stand and aborting it? Really? This isn’t a small statistic, this is the crux of the issue even though the left always frames it as a rape issue; it is not a rape issue. Roe vs Wade was historically based on a lie; the biography of the women who the Democrats used to pass Roe vs Wade explains the lies it was based off of (and her part in that lie). Abortion clinics are placed in predominately Black area because the women who championed abortions was using it to wipe out the Black communities. Pro-Abortion is not merely about rape.

My issue is with the acceptance and promotion of culturally and socially irresponsible behavior. Promote sexual promiscuity and be surprised that there’s a #metoo movement? Isn’t promoting sexual promiscuity merely shuffling women to less than ideal groups of men? The women’s’ sexual freedom movement, in encouraging women to be like men, all it did was hurt women in the end and encourage them to kill their own children.

Let’s be real here. This acceptance of sexual promiscuity, supplying naive women to creepy men, then the subsequent sexual abuse of women, and the #metoo movement spawning from that abuse have made the good men who are worried about their reputation afraid to be near women. It’s the sexual predators who are thrilled when women don’t care about one-night stands, not the good men who want a wife and family.

Look, even with the acceptance of sexual promiscuity, the average man is now afraid to be near women. The ones who value their livelihoods are limiting their interaction with women, and in a strange way being forced to be sexually conservative because of the left (which is honestly not what I expected would happen, but it makes perfect sense). Protecting your reputation against sexual accusations = sexual conservatism.

There are also many children who have had rough lives, but why take away the opportunity for that child’s chance at a life? What do you have to say to the children who were adopted into families and are doing fine? Do they deserve a chance at life or not?

Filled orphanages in Romania and pedophile plans are leaps you’ve made, not I. How about we not put pedophiles in charge of orphanages? How about we punish the pedophile by imprisoning them while we let innocent get a chance at life? People are born into difficult situations, I don’t think we should kill them as some form of “spare the child of a horrid life”. To equate a less than ideal start in life as a mercy killing of sorts is frankly atrocious. Blacks born in the hood have a tough freaking life too, is that why abortion clinic are always near the hood?

How about we give the child a chance at life and you might be surprised at how well they end up doing.

I’m not for state-run orphanages, but I believe we need to support and promote adoption in the same manner (if no, more so) than we do Abortion clinics, with the same energy that MSM supports Planned Parenthood - create awareness, accept donations to orphanages, run regular wellness checks by the government and have a free press that would report any abuse and not run cover for them (like they do Planned Parenthood).

There is one area where I do sit back and take a pause, which is the “forced birth” scenario. I would hope that culturally we all see value to life, that we punish rapists severely, and the children are given a chance to succeed and define what their own life means to them - and that the women who make these life-affirming decisions are celebrated and respected for their strength in the same manner IF NOT MORE than the ones aborting them; but a society like that is only plausible if we value human life at it’s fundamental core. A human is a human is a human.

That’s my take/observation on the whole matter. We can agree to disagree but the whole “Christ almighty with all this pro-life going on in the Donald forum”, Trump is Pro-Life. Pro-Life people have been congregating outside of the Leftists bubble for decades despite the MSM attempt to stamp us out. Let us speak for once, its not like you have the whole of Hollywood, MSM, and my tax paying dollars supporting your stances.

I don’t believe the argument is too simplistic, it’s merely an observation about the psychology of what the left justifies and prioritizes; following through to the end. I mean really, you have to ask yourself how the left can justify burning down the livelihoods of innocent people over the death of George Floyd. Seems like certain lives > other lives; which is the exact argument pro-abortionists make.

The right argues that all life is important. The left says “Black Live Matter” and a woman was gunned down for saying “All Lives Matter” - I would assume that includes Black Lives. Ask yourself, what the results would be of valuing one life over the other; isn’t it just death? I‘m saying both are important and we need to make room for all life. There’s room for both, but BLM only seems to think there’s room for one (their side) just like the Left seems to with Pro-Abortion there’s only room for one (the mother).

Here’s my major gripe against “it’s too simplistic” phrase: 2+2=5 Twitter posts. If you complicate things enough you can justify things like men can be women and gender is a construct but that gay men love men and lesbian love women but gender is a construct. If you complicate things enough, you can start defending absurd ideas.

Now onto your statement “there’s not much connection between killing an infant and an abortion...” I have to point you to the Virginia Governor Ralph Northam that stated: ‘ “If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen,” he continued. “The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”’

There is definitely a correlation between abortion and infanticide and I would argue that it has to do with the value someone places on human life.

As you’ve said, due to sociopathy or psychopathy if serial killers don’t give a toss about abortions then I would argue that it says something about the sociopathy or psychopathy of the left - which is evidenced by everything going on right now, especially the violence, murder, mayhem, and lawlessness coming from the left. Their actions fall in life with their belief on the value life, there certainly is a correlation and plenty of evidence.

Out of the millions of abortion performed every year, only a fraction of that is due to rape, the rest are merely a convenience issue. I’m advocating sexual conservatism and responsibility. The left promotes sexual heathenism while being pro-abortion; is their response to procreation of life as simple as a one night stand and aborting it? Really? This isn’t a small statistic, this is the crux of the issue even though the left always frames it as a rape issue; it is not a rape issue. Roe vs Wade was historically based on a lie; the biography of the women who the Democrats used to pass Roe vs Wade explains the lies it was based off of (and her part in that lie). Abortion clinics are placed in predominately Black area because the women who championed abortions was using it to wipe out the Black communities. Pro-Abortion is not merely about rape.

My issue is with the acceptance and promotion of culturally and socially irresponsible behavior. Promote sexual promiscuity and be surprised that there’s a #metoo movement? Isn’t promoting sexual promiscuity merely shuffling women to less than ideal groups of men? The women’s’ sexual freedom movement, in encouraging women to be like men, all it did was hurt women in the end and encourage them to kill their own children.

Let’s be real here. This acceptance of sexual promiscuity, supplying naive women to creepy men, then the subsequent sexual abuse of women, and the #metoo movement spawning from that abuse have made the good men who are worried about their reputation afraid to be near women. It’s the sexual predators who are thrilled when women don’t care about one-night stands, not the good men who want a wife and family.

Look, even with the acceptance of sexual promiscuity, the average man is now afraid to be near women. The ones who value their livelihoods are limiting their interaction with women, and in a strange way being forced to be sexually conservative because of the left (which is honestly not what I expected would happen, but it makes perfect sense). Protecting your reputation against sexual accusations = sexual conservatism.

There are also many children who have had rough lives, but why take away the opportunity for that child’s chance at a life? What do you have to say to the children who were adopted into families and are doing fine? Do they deserve a chance at life or not?

Filled orphanages in Romania and pedophile plans are leaps you’ve made, not I. How about we not put pedophiles in charge of orphanages? How about we punish the pedophile by imprisoning them while we let innocent get a chance at life? People are born into difficult situations, I don’t think we should kill them as some form of “spare the child of a horrid life”. To equate a less than ideal start in life as a mercy killing of sorts is frankly atrocious. Blacks born in the hood have a tough freaking life too, is that why abortion clinic are always near the hood?

How about we give the child a chance at life and you might be surprised at how well they end up doing.

I’m not for state-run orphanages, but I believe we need to support and promote adoption in the same manner (if no, more so) than we do Abortion clinics, with the same energy that MSM supports Planned Parenthood - create awareness, accept donations to orphanages, run regular wellness checks by the government and have a free press that would report any abuse and not run cover for them (like they do Planned Parenthood).

There is one area where I do sit back and take a pause, which is the “forced birth” scenario. I would hope that culturally we all see value to life, that we punish rapists severely, and the children are given a chance to succeed and define what their own life means to them - and that the women who make these life-affirming decisions are celebrated and respected for their strength in the same manner IF NOT MORE than the ones aborting them; but a society like that is only plausible if we value human life at it’s fundamental core. A human is a human is a human.

That’s my take/observation on the whole matter. We can agree to disagree but the whole “Christ almighty with all this pro-life going on in the Donald forum”, Trump is Pro-Life. Pro-Life people have been congregating outside of the Leftists bubble for decades despite the MSM attempt to stamp us out. Let us speak for once, its not like you have the whole of Hollywood, MSM, and my tax paying dollars supporting your stances.

I don’t believe the argument is too simplistic, it’s merely an observation about the psychology of what the left justifies and prioritizes; following through to the end. I mean really, you have to ask yourself how the left can justify burning down the livelihoods of innocent people over the death of George Floyd. Seems like certain lives > other lives; which is the exact argument pro-abortionists make.

The right argues that all life is important. The left says “Black Live Matter” and a woman was gunned down for saying “All Lives Matter” - I would assume that includes Black Lives. Ask yourself, what the fundamental and root cause is of the left valuing one life over the other. I would argue that both are important and we need to make room for all lie whether that’s a pro-life vs pro-abortion or a BLM versus the “All Lives Matter” case. I don’t think you should be gunned down or beaten simply for saying All Live Matter, just like BLM shouldn’t be gunned down or beaten. There’s room for both, but BLM only seems to think there’s room for one (their side).

Here’s my major gripe against “it’s too simplistic” phrase: 2+2=5 Twitter posts. If you complicate things enough you can justify things like men can be women and gender is a construct but that gay men love men and lesbian love women but gender is a construct. If you complicate things enough, you can start defending absurd ideas.

Now onto your statement “there’s not much connection between killing an infant and an abortion...” I have to point you to the Virginia Governor Ralph Northam that stated: ‘ “If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen,” he continued. “The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”’

There is definitely a correlation between abortion and infanticide and I would argue that it has to do with the value someone places on human life.

As you’ve said, due to sociopathy or psychopathy if serial killers don’t give a toss about abortions then I would argue that it says something about the sociopathy or psychopathy of the left - which is evidenced by everything going on right now, especially the violence, murder, mayhem, and lawlessness coming from the left. Their actions fall in life with their belief on the value life, there certainly is a correlation and plenty of evidence.

Out of the millions of abortion performed every year, only a fraction of that is due to rape, the rest are merely a convenience issue. I’m advocating sexual conservatism and responsibility. The left promotes sexual heathenism while being pro-abortion; is their response to procreation of life as simple as a one night stand and aborting it? Really? This isn’t a small statistic, this is the crux of the issue even though the left always frames it as a rape issue; it is not a rape issue. Roe vs Wade was historically based on a lie; the biography of the women who the Democrats used to pass Roe vs Wade explains the lies it was based off of (and her part in that lie). Abortion clinics are placed in predominately Black area because the women who championed abortions was using it to wipe out the Black communities. Pro-Abortion is not merely about rape.

My issue is with the acceptance and promotion of culturally and socially irresponsible behavior. Promote sexual promiscuity and be surprised that there’s a #metoo movement? Isn’t promoting sexual promiscuity merely shuffling women to less than ideal groups of men? The women’s’ sexual freedom movement, in encouraging women to be like men, all it did was hurt women in the end and encourage them to kill their own children.

Let’s be real here. This acceptance of sexual promiscuity, supplying naive women to creepy men, then the subsequent sexual abuse of women, and the #metoo movement spawning from that abuse have made the good men who are worried about their reputation afraid to be near women. It’s the sexual predators who are thrilled when women don’t care about one-night stands, not the good men who want a wife and family.

Look, even with the acceptance of sexual promiscuity, the average man is now afraid to be near women. The ones who value their livelihoods are limiting their interaction with women, and in a strange way being forced to be sexually conservative because of the left (which is honestly not what I expected would happen, but it makes perfect sense). Protecting your reputation against sexual accusations = sexual conservatism.

There are also many children who have had rough lives, but why take away the opportunity for that child’s chance at a life? What do you have to say to the children who were adopted into families and are doing fine? Do they deserve a chance at life or not?

Filled orphanages in Romania and pedophile plans are leaps you’ve made, not I. How about we not put pedophiles in charge of orphanages? How about we punish the pedophile by imprisoning them while we let innocent get a chance at life? People are born into difficult situations, I don’t think we should kill them as some form of “spare the child of a horrid life”. To equate a less than ideal start in life as a mercy killing of sorts is frankly atrocious. Blacks born in the hood have a tough freaking life too, is that why abortion clinic are always near the hood?

How about we give the child a chance at life and you might be surprised at how well they end up doing.

I’m not for state-run orphanages, but I believe we need to support and promote adoption in the same manner (if no, more so) than we do Abortion clinics, with the same energy that MSM supports Planned Parenthood - create awareness, accept donations to orphanages, run regular wellness checks by the government and have a free press that would report any abuse and not run cover for them (like they do Planned Parenthood).

There is one area where I do sit back and take a pause, which is the “forced birth” scenario. I would hope that culturally we all see value to life, that we punish rapists severely, and the children are given a chance to succeed and define what their own life means to them - and that the women who make these life-affirming decisions are celebrated and respected for their strength in the same manner IF NOT MORE than the ones aborting them; but a society like that is only plausible if we value human life at it’s fundamental core. A human is a human is a human.

That’s my take/observation on the whole matter. We can agree to disagree but the whole “Christ almighty with all this pro-life going on in the Donald forum”, Trump is Pro-Life. Pro-Life people have been congregating outside of the Leftists bubble for decades despite the MSM attempt to stamp us out. Let us speak for once, its not like you have the whole of Hollywood, MSM, and my tax paying dollars supporting your stances.