The psychology involved here is fascinating. They know that most of their readers are not ready to make the leap to pedophilia yet. They're still in the process of making adult attraction to children socially acceptable so long as it is not acted upon. At the same time they want to begin the conditioning which will get the NPCs to accept the idea that some children want to be sexually active with adults. Shows like this and that other one with the cross-dressing child who strips for gays are the important steps in this direction.

So they don't want the readership to denounce the show, they want the readership to accept the show as avant-garde, but something that should be allowed. How do they do that when it is so blatantly sexualizing children?

You take out your latest right-wing Boogeyman and you say they have a problem with this show. And of course the readership doesn't want to be associated with anything right wing. They've been well trained to take pride in their opposition to right-wingers.

Still this show is a bit much, it could be a threat to the conditioning of the readers if they begin to think to themselves, "wait a minute maybe these crazy right winners are right. So in order to assuage his conscience, the reader is assured that there is a larger movement against "trafficking" which is perfectly okay for him to accept and which is embraced by their thought leaders as well, so there's no larger conspiracy towards pedophilia at work here.

Nevertheless the readership must be careful, because the crazies have hijacked the movement, there is a moral danger in looking too closely into human trafficking.

Notice also how the word pedophilia is never even explicitly mentioned. The word they use is trafficking. This is also an act of misdirection.

These people are truly evil.

The psychology involved here is fascinating. They know that most of their readers are not ready to make the leap to pedophilia yet. They're still in the process of making adult attraction to children socially acceptable so long as it is not acted upon. At the same time they want to begin the conditioning which will get the NPCs to accept the idea that some children want to be sexually active with adults. Shows like this and that other one with the cross-dressing child who strips for gays are the important steps in this direction.

So they don't want the readership to denounce the show, they want the readership to accept the show as avant-garde, but something that should be allowed. How do they do that when it is so blatantly sexualizing children? Because remember the readership isn't there yet.

You take out your latest right-wing Boogeyman and you say they have a problem with this show. And of course the readership doesn't want to be associated with anything right wing. They've been well trained to take pride in their opposition to right-wingers.

Still this show is a bit much, it could be a threat to the conditioning of the readers if they begin to think to themselves, "wait a minute maybe these crazy right winners are right. So in order to assuage his conscience, the reader is assured that there is a larger movement against "trafficking" which is perfectly okay for him to accept and which is embraced by their thought leaders as well, so there's no larger conspiracy towards pedophilia at work here.

Nevertheless the readership must be careful, because the crazies have hijacked the movement, there is a moral danger in looking too closely into human trafficking.

Notice also how the word pedophilia is never even explicitly mentioned. The word they use is trafficking. This is also an act of misdirection.

These people are truly evil.

The psychology involved here is fascinating. They know that most of their readers are not ready to make the leap to pedophilia yet. They're still in the process of making adult attraction to children socially acceptable so long as it is not acted upon. At the same time they want to begin the conditioning which will get the NPCs to accept the idea that some children want to be sexually active with adults. Shows like this and that other one with the cross-dressing child who strips for gays are the important steps in this direction.

So they don't want the readership to denounce the show, they want the readership to accept the show as avant-garde, but something that should be allowed. How do they do that when it is so blatantly sexualizing children? Because remember the readership isn't there yet.

You take out your latest right-wing Boogeyman and you say they have a problem with this show. And of course the readership doesn't want to be associated with anything right wing. But in case they balk and begin to think to themselves, "wait a minute maybe these crazy right winners are right", the reader is assured that there is a larger movement against "trafficking" which is perfectly okay for them to and which is embraced by those in the know, so there's no larger conspiracy towards pedophilia here.

Nevertheless the readership must be careful, because the crazies have hijacked the movement and turned it against this artistic and brave show.

Notice also how the word pedophilia is never even explicitly mentioned. The word they use is trafficking. This is also an act of misdirection.

These people are truly evil.