Win / TheDonald
TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

The only league you’re in is little league.

First of all, and most importantly, even 4chan fuckwads have figured out how to use even MSPaint anonymously with a mouse to circle shit, and if you can’t use your “professional experience” to export an image to upload someplace anonymously without exposing PPI, you’re literal GARBAGE.

Secondly, it’s not to demand you guess the focal length, lens size, colorspace, or camera body/sensor down to a model number, it’s to acknowledge the differences created by the different capture devices at all. Quite frankly, your inability to draw two circles around the contours of his skull you claim are different without doxxing your social security number speaks to the level of “professionalism” you have. Nice choice on the 85mm prime, though. Even a blind pig finds a truffle here and there.

The most likely scenario is this:

It’s the same Fetterman. There is no body double, and the vast differences between these individual frames are based on the capture medium, the low light and low contrast level in the video capture, the difference between the capture devices accounts for the variance. The elongation of the brow in one picture, vs the compression in the other, is completely caused by these differences.

But let’s steelman your argument. Let’s say it’s a completely different skull shape between the two images. First of all, what’s that fucking worth? Seriously, what the fuck good is pointing to the shittiest possible sets of comparisons due the obvious discrepancies in the quality of the capture? The only people who are going to listen to you with this yard turd of a theory already believe the government can’t be trusted at any cost, and pull their energy away from meaningful efforts towards fixing this shit.

But hey, mr “professional,” you could always go use your equipment to capture images yourself, and with the time and the exposer to the supposed body double, you would undoubtedly reveal undeniable, reliable evidence of the body discrepencies, and have the biggest news story in US history; the Government replaces elected officials with body double mouthpieces, and the system is occupied by such forces right now. You’d have an instant following and probably get the attention of people who’d help replace whatever income you lost due to the exposer of yourself. Givesendgo or one of the other right-side leaning crowd funding options would certainly work. Plus, your investigative and presentative skills would surely attract high paying employers, or boost your own notoriety and add viewers to content you’re already skillfully creating. You’d get on Crowder, Info Wars, Daily Wire exclusives; instant fame and credibility. You’d have the opportunity to create more wealth for yourself than your lifetime of bussing tables while having a hobby of cameras. Wealth you could use to more effectively fight the real corruption and decay in our system, instead of pointing like a retarded wojack at a bulge in a hoodie.

But hey, we both know you already know all this. And instead of doing something useful like preparing for 2024 and finding out how you can use your equipment to monitor and expose fraud at ballot counting facilities across the nation, you push these theories that would make Rod Sterling roll his eyes in frustrated disgust.

88 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The only league you’re in is little league.

First of all, and most importantly, even 4chan fuckwads have figured out how to use even MSPaint anonymously with a mouse to circle shit, and if you can’t use your “professional experience” to export an image to upload someplace anonymously without exposing PPI, you’re literal GARBAGE.

Secondly, it’s not to demand you guess the focal length, lens size, colorspace, or camera body/sensor down to a model number, it’s to acknowledge the differences created by the different capture devices at all. Quite frankly, your inability to draw two circles around the contours of his skull you claim are different without doxxing your social security number speaks to the level of “professionalism” you have. Nice choice on the 85mm prime, though. Even a blind pig finds a truffle here and there.

The most likely scenario is this:

It’s the same Fetterman. There is no body double, and the vast differences between these individual frames are based on the capture medium, the low light and low contrast level in the video capture, the difference between the capture devices accounts for the variance. The elongation of the brow in one picture, vs the compression in the other, is completely caused by these differences.

But let’s steelman your argument. Let’s say it’s a completely different skull shape between the two images. First of all, what’s that fucking worth? Seriously, what the fuck good is pointing to the shittiest possible sets of comparisons due the obvious discrepancies in the quality of the capture? The only people who are going to listen to you with this yard turd of a theory already believe the government can’t be trusted at ant cost, and pull their energy away from meaningful efforts towards fixing this shit.

But hey, mr “professional,” you could always go use your equipment to capture images yourself, and with the time and the exposer to the supposed body double, you would undoubtedly reveal undeniable, reliable evidence of the body discrepencies, and have the biggest news story in US history; the Government replaces elected officials with body double mouthpieces, and the system is occupied by such forces right now. You’d have an instant following and probably get the attention of people who’d help replace whatever income you lost due to the exposer of yourself. Givesendgo or one of the other right-side leaning crowd funding options would certainly work. Plus, your investigative and presentative skills would surely attract high paying employers, or boost your own notoriety and add viewers to content you’re already skillfully creating. You’d get on Crowder, Info Wars, Daily Wire exclusives; instant fame and credibility. You’d have the opportunity to create more wealth for yourself than your lifetime of bussing tables while having a hobby of cameras. Wealth you could use to more effectively fight the real corruption and decay in our system, instead of pointing like a retarded wojack at a bulge in a hoodie.

But hey, we both know you already know all this. And instead of doing something useful like preparing for 2024 and finding out how you can use your equipment to monitor and expose fraud at ballot counting facilities across the nation, you push these theories that would make Rod Sterling roll his eyes in frustrated disgust.

88 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

The only league you’re in is little league.

First of all, and most importantly, even 4chan fuckwads have figured out how to use even MSPaint anonymously with a mouse to circle shit, and if you can’t use your “professional experience” to export an image to upload someplace anonymously without exposing PPI, you’re literal GARBAGE.

Secondly, it’s not to demand you guess the focal length, lens size, colorspace, or camera body/sensor down to a model number, it’s to acknowledge the differences created by the different capture devices at all. Quite frankly, your inability to draw two circles around the contours of his skull you claim are different without doxxing your social security number speaks to the level of “professionalism” you have. Nice choice on the 85mm prime, though. Even a blind pig finds a truffle here and there.

The most likely scenario is this:

It’s the same Fetterman. There is no body double, and the vast differences between these individual frames are based on the capture medium, the low light and low contrast level in the video capture, the difference between the capture devices accounts for the variance. The elongation of the brow in one picture, vs the compression in the other, is completely caused by these differences.

But let’s steelman your argument. Let’s say it’s a completely different skull shape between the two images. First of all, what’s that fucking worth? Seriously, what the fuck good is pointing to the shittiest possible sets of comparisons due the obvious discrepancies in the quality of the capture? The only people who are going to listen to you with this yard turd of a theory already believe the government can’t be trusted at ant cost, and pull their energy away from meaningful efforts towards fixing this shit.

But hey, mr “professional,” you could always go use your equipment to capture images yourself, and with the time and the exposer to the supposed body double, you would undoubtedly reveal undeniable, reliable evidence of the body discrepencies, and have the biggest news story in US history; the Government replaces elected officials with body double mouthpieces, and the system is occupied by such forces right now. You’d have an instant following and probably get the attention of people who’d help replace whatever income you lost due to the exposer of yourself. Givesendgo or one of the other right-side leaning crowd funding options would certainly work. Plus, your investigative and presentative skills would surely attract high paying employers, or boost your own notoriety and add viewers to content you’re already skillfully creating. You’d get on Crowder, Info Wars, Daily Wire exclusives; instant fame and credibility. You’d have the opportunity to create more wealth for yourself than your lifetime of bussing tables while having a hobby of cameras. Wealth you could use to more effectively fight the real corruption and decay in our system, instead of pointing like a retarded wojack at a bulge in a hoodie.

But hey, we both know you already know all this. And instead of doing something useful like preparing for 2024 and finding out how you can use your equipment to monitor and expose fraud and ballot counting facilities across the nation, you push these theories that would make Rod Sterling roll his eyes in frustrated disgust.

88 days ago
1 score