Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I think it's at the point where with a lot of these people in their broken minds it's an atrocity that there was even a trial and that he wasn't immediately executed in public.

They definitely should have investigated but they did rush to press charges. However, I believe that was under public pressure. Those threats would not have gone away either way.

You're dealing with terrorists and they made a mistake in the first place negotiating with them. It's like feeding the stray in your back garden. You'll be sure to see it again. You're going to have a hell of a time getting rid of it.

In the UK we have a very problematic legal tradition that still impacts law of simply keeping the peace. If you have an oppressive rule or a reasonable population then it can work well. A reasonable population doesn't become restless without good reason.

What you have here is an unreasonable population. You can't fall into the trap of "keeping the peace". You have to stand up to them and use greater force, whatever is necessary, even if you end up having to so to speak brutally put down a peasant uprising.

Rule is rule, you have to protect it at the end of the day. Be it about keeping the peace or upholding the law (maintaining justice).

This is deliberate. In their calculations it damages Trump. Either there's a crack down and ultimately it gets brutal then they try to call like he's Assad (which was also a lot of bullshit reporting) or the population is terrorised by Democrat irregular militia running around terrorising everyone with their Kristallnacht. A lot of people just want to terror to end. Voting Biden will achieve that or so they believe. It's about voting for who is the least sore loser.

224 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

I think it's at the point where with a lot of these people in their broken minds it's an atrocity that there was even a trial and that he wasn't immediately executed in public.

They definitely should have investigated but they did rush to press charges. However, I believe that was under public pressure. Those threats would not have gone away either way.

You're dealing with terrorists and they made a mistake in the first place negotiating with them. It's like feeding the stray in your back garden. You'll be sure to see it again. You're going to have a hell of a time getting rid of it.

In the UK we have a very problematic legal tradition that still impacts law of simply keeping the peace. If you have an oppressive rule or a reasonable population then it can work well. A reasonable population doesn't become restless without good reason.

What you have here is an unreasonable population. You can't fall into the trap of "keeping the peace". You have to stand up to them and use greater force, whatever is necessary, even if you end up having to so to speak brutally put down a peasant uprising.

Rule is rule, you have to protect it at the end of the day. Be it about keeping the peace or upholding the law (maintaining justice).

This is deliberate. In their calculations it damages Trump. Either there's a crack down and ultimately it gets brutal then they try to call like he's Assad (which was also a lot of bullshit reporting) or the population is terrorised by Democrat irregular militia running around terrorising everyone with their Kristallnacht. A lot of people just want to terror to end. Voting Biden will achieve that or so they believe.

224 days ago
1 score