I think that kind of point falls apart in hindsight. People miss the original footage. It's often cut or otherwise edited.

When Floyd passes out Chauvin does check on him but he's also distracted by the hostile crowd which is being aggressive. At this point he has to pull out his mace.

Their attention is divided and the threat level is higher. This would have had an inhibiting effect and the cops were also aware the ambulance was only a minute out.

It wasn't just a hothead being threatening with his shouting, they also tried to interfere. It cannot be said at that point that it was four police officers dealing with a single suspect. They also comment on the crowd being hostile later in the footage.

The cops aren't necessarily medics and I don't think not providing CPR in those short tense moments should be something you want to set the standard that you go to prison on either murder or manslaughter chargers for. It's demanding a level of perfection that's extreme. Perhaps a reprimand would potentially be appropriate.

The woman might not have been pregnant. That may have been made up. It doesn't really make any difference. He wasn't an angel and certainly no saint.

The situation with the car is nonsense. A lot of it is. That's just what cops have to deal with. One minute he's fine in a car and is reluctant to get out. Then when it comes into getting into another car suddenly he's claustrophobic and can't breath. Had George Floyd gotten into that car then they could have hooked up with the ambulance quicker. Therefore he's guilty of his own manslaughter. Not to mention his own responsibility for his health and his state of intoxication.

The whole lot is just fucked up. It's all a democrat run shop and they're responsible for policing. Floyd was most responsible for his circumstances but after that Chinese imports (presumed for fentanyl) twice over. Also the only racist thing in all of this was if you listen carefully a woman in the original video was racially abusing Chauvin saying "It's the whites, this is what they do, they like messing with black people."

Other things about the situation are mind boggling. Like why they rip off the shop then just stay outside waiting to be caught. If you listen to the testimony of the three then they're like stooges, bumbling idiots.

That hothead in the crowd or at least one of them might have made things worse than you think. A shop attendant tried to tell the cops is was an OD. I think the shop attendant was also clued in from them being excessively intoxicated outside earlier or going in and out of the shop. The hothead bullied the shop attendant back inside.

If you also watch the trial Floyd wasn't alone. Believe it or not, the guy who was with him and also trying to pass the fake bill in an earlier attempt is apparently testifying. I crapped myself.

I've gone through the details extensively and I'm probably in around the same place as you. I can see things that could be done better, that's almost always the case in retrospect. I do not however see any failure significant enough to press charges. I think there's the assumption that any mistake and they're liable but I don't see that as being proportionate. It's demanding a standard that's excessive, for cops to get it perfect every time.

The trial is going to be dragged out though and they're probably going to try to force a guilty verdict. Thanks to the media the jury has already been tampered. Jury selection that's not biased will be very difficult. Names need to be protected as well across the board because intimidation is extreme. Any jury will be under intense intimidation. I am sure the name of Chauvin's lawyer isn't really Earl Gray. If that's his real name then my name is Taylors of Harrogate.

We also already know there is institutional bias. Forcing the charges is because of the autopsy which is meant to be independent. The second autopsy is purely for show and doesn't account for anything. It's troubling however that unlike the second autopsy the first is from a party that is supposed to be legitimate. The autopsy rules homicide but there's no basis for this in any of the physical findings. It's a completely baseless guess. The two happening at the same time does not mean it's causative. It would at best count as improbable homicide.

If the pathologist can be gotten to so to improperly rule homicide then why not the judge or anyone else? This sticks out like a sore thumb. They're just written homicide with no basis for it. Someone obviously wanted it to say that no matter what. Being able to press charges really hinged on that.

There are certain elements to this that make me suspect he intentionally tried to recreate an Eric Gardner. Bit of an over the top insurance scam. Often when these people died their families get millions.

I think that kind of point falls apart in hindsight. People miss the original footage. It's often cut or otherwise edited.

When Floyd passes out Chauvin does check on him but he's also distracted by the hostile crowd which is being aggressive. At this point he has to pull out his mace.

Their attention is divided and the threat level is higher. This would have had an inhibiting effect and the cops were also aware the ambulance was only a minute out.

It wasn't just a hothead being threatening with his shouting, they also tried to interfere. It cannot be said at that point that it was four police officers dealing with a single suspect. They also comment on the crowd being hostile later in the footage.

The cops aren't necessarily medics and I don't think not providing CPR in those short tense moments should be something you want to set the standard that you go to prison on either murder or manslaughter chargers for. It's demanding a level of perfection that's extreme. Perhaps a reprimand would potentially be appropriate.

The woman might not have been pregnant. That may have been made up. It doesn't really make any difference. He wasn't an angel and certainly no saint.

The situation with the car is nonsense. A lot of it is. That's just what cops have to deal with. One minute he's fine in a car and is reluctant to get out. Then when it comes into getting into another car suddenly he's claustrophobic and can't breath. Had George Floyd gotten into that car then they could have hooked up with the ambulance quicker. Therefore he's guilty of his own manslaughter. Not to mention his own responsibility for his health and his state of intoxication.

The whole lot is just fucked up. It's all a democrat run shop and they're responsible for policing. Floyd was most responsible for his circumstances but after that Chinese imports (presumed for fentanyl) twice over. Also the only racist thing in all of this was if you listen carefully a woman in the original video was racially abusing Chauvin saying "It's the whites, this is what they do, they like messing with black people."

Other things about the situation are mind boggling. Like why they rip off the shop then just stay outside waiting to be caught. If you listen to the testimony of the three then they're like stooges, bumbling idiots.

That hothead in the crowd or at least one of them might have made things worse than you think. A shop attendant tried to tell the cops is was an OD. I think the shop attendant was also clued in from them being excessively intoxicated outside earlier or going in and out of the shop. The hothead bullied the shop attendant back inside.

If you also watch the trial Floyd wasn't alone. Believe it or not, the guy who was with him and also trying to pass the fake bill in an earlier attempt is apparently testifying. I crapped myself.

I've gone through the details extensively and I'm probably in around the same place as you. I can see things that could be done better, that's almost always the case in retrospect. I do not however see any failure significant enough to press charges. I think there's the assumption that any mistake and they're liable but I don't see that as being proportionate. It's demanding a standard that's excessive, for cops to get it perfect every time.

The trial is going to be dragged out though and they're probably going to try to force a guilty verdict. Thanks to the media the jury has already been tampered. Jury selection that's not biased will be very difficult. Names need to be protected as well across the board because intimidation is extreme. Any jury will be under intense intimidation. I am sure the name of Chauvin's lawyer isn't really Earl Gray. If that's his real name then my name is Taylors of Harrogate.

We also already know there is institutional bias. Forcing the charges is because of the autopsy which is meant to be independent. The second autopsy is purely for show and doesn't account for anything. It's troubling however that unlike the second autopsy the first is from a party that is supposed to be legitimate. The autopsy rules homicide but there's no basis for this in any of the physical findings. It's a completely baseless guess. The two happening at the same time does not mean it's causative. It would at best count as improbable homicide.

If the pathologist can be gotten to so to improperly rule homicide then why not the judge or anyone else? This sticks out like a sore thumb. They're just written homicide with no basis for it. Someone obviously wanted it to say that no matter what. Being able to press charges really hinged on that.

There are certain elements to this that make me suspect he intentionally tried to recreate an Eric Gardner. Bit of an over the top insurance like scam. Often when these people died their families get millions.

I think that kind of point falls apart in hindsight. People miss the original footage. It's often cut or otherwise edited.

When Floyd passes out Chauvin does check on him but he's also distracted by the hostile crowd which is being aggressive. At this point he has to pull out his mace.

Their attention is divided and the threat level is higher. This would have had an inhibiting effect and the cops were also aware the ambulance was only a minute out.

It wasn't just a hothead being threatening with his shouting, they also tried to interfere. It cannot be said at that point that it was four police officers dealing with a single suspect. They also comment on the crowd being hostile later in the footage.

The cops aren't necessarily medics and I don't think not providing CPR in those short tense moments should be something you want to set the standard that you go to prison on either murder or manslaughter chargers for. It's demanding a level of perfection that's extreme. Perhaps a reprimand would potentially be appropriate.

The woman might not have been pregnant. That may have been made up. It doesn't really make any difference. He wasn't an angel and certainly no saint.

The situation with the car is nonsense. A lot of it is. That's just what cops have to deal with. One minute he's fine in a car and is reluctant to get out. Then when it comes into getting into another car suddenly he's claustrophobic and can't breath. Had George Floyd gotten into that car then they could have hooked up with the ambulance quicker. Therefore he's guilty of his own manslaughter. Not to mention his own responsibility for his health and his state of intoxication.

The whole lot is just fucked up. It's all a democrat run shop and they're responsible for policing. Floyd was most responsible for his circumstances but after that Chinese imports (presumed for fentanyl) twice over. Also the only racist thing in all of this was if you listen carefully a woman in the original video was racially abusing Chauvin saying "It's the whites, this is what they do, they like messing with black people."

Other things about the situation are mind boggling. Like why they rip off the shop then just stay outside waiting to be caught. If you listen to the testimony of the three then they're like stooges, bumbling idiots.

That hothead in the crowd or at least one of them might have made things worse than you think. A shop attendant tried to tell the cops is was an OD. I think the shop attendant was also clued in from them being excessively intoxicated outside earlier or going in and out of the shop. The hothead bullied the shop attendant back inside.

If you also watch the trial Floyd wasn't alone. Believe it or not, the guy who was with him and also trying to pass the fake bill in an earlier attempt is apparently testifying. I crapped myself.

I've gone through the details extensively and I'm probably in around the same place as you. I can see things that could be done better, that's almost always the case in retrospect. I do not however see any failure significant enough to press charges. I think there's the assumption that any mistake and they're liable but I don't see that as being proportionate. It's demanding a standard that's excessive, for cops to get it perfect every time.

The trial is going to be dragged out though and they're probably going to try to force a guilty verdict. Thanks to the media the jury has already been tampered. Jury selection that's not biased will be very difficult. Names need to be protected as well across the board because intimidation is extreme. Any jury will be under intense intimidation. I am sure the name of Chauvin's lawyer isn't really Earl Gray. If that's his real name then my name is Taylors of Harrogate.

We also already know there is institutional bias. Forcing the charges is because of the autopsy which is meant to be independent. The second autopsy is purely for show and doesn't account for anything. It's troubling however that unlike the second autopsy the first is from a party that is supposed to be legitimate. The autopsy rules homicide but there's no basis for this in any of the physical findings. It's a completely baseless guess. The two happening at the same time does not mean it's causative. It would at best count as improbable homicide.

If the pathologist can be gotten to so to improperly rule homicide then why not the judge or anyone else? This sticks out like a sore thumb. They're just written homicide with no basis for it. Someone obviously wanted it to say that no matter what. Being able to press charges really hinged on that.

I think that kind of point falls apart in hindsight. People miss the original footage. It's often cut or otherwise edited.

When Floyd passes out Chauvin does check on him but he's also distracted by the hostile crowd which is being aggressive. At this point he has to pull out his mace.

Their attention is divided and the threat level is higher. This would have had an inhibiting effect and the cops were also aware the ambulance was only a minute out.

It wasn't just a hothead being threatening with his shouting, they also tried to interfere. It cannot be said at that point that it was four police officers dealing with a single suspect. They also comment on the crowd being hostile later in the footage.

The cops aren't necessarily medics and I don't think not providing CPR in those short tense moments should be something you want to set the standard that you go to prison on either murder or manslaughter chargers for. It's demanding a level of perfection that's extreme. Perhaps a reprimand would potentially be appropriate.

The woman might not have been pregnant. That may have been made up. It doesn't really make any difference. He wasn't an angel and certainly no saint.

The situation with the car is nonsense. A lot of it is. That's just what cops have to deal with. One minute he's fine in a car and is reluctant to get out. Then when it comes into getting into another car suddenly he's claustrophobic and can't breath. Had George Floyd gotten into that car then they could have hooked up with the ambulance quicker. Therefore he's guilty of his own manslaughter. Not to mention his own responsibility for his health and his state of intoxication.

The whole lot is just fucked up. It's all a democrat run shop and they're responsible for policing. Floyd was most responsible for his circumstances but after that Chinese imports (presumed for fentanyl) twice over. Also the only racist thing in all of this was if you listen carefully a woman in the original video was racially abusing Chauvin saying "It's the whites, this is what they do, they like messing with black people."

Other things about the situation are mind boggling. Like why they rip off the shop then just stay outside waiting to be caught. If you listen to the testimony of the three then they're like stooges, bumbling idiots.

That hothead in the crowd or at least one of them might have made things worse than you think. A shop attendant tried to tell the cops is was an OD. I think the shop attendant was also clued in from them being excessively intoxicated outside earlier or going in and out of the shop. The hothead bullied the shop attendant back inside.

If you also watch the trial Floyd wasn't alone. Believe it or not, the guy who was with him and also trying to pass the fake bill in an earlier attempt is apparently testifying. I crapped myself.

I've gone through the details extensively and I'm probably in around the same place as you. I can see things that could be done better, that's almost always the case in retrospect. I do not however see any failure significant enough to press charges. I think there's the assumption that any mistake and they're liable but I don't see that as being proportionate. It's demanding a standard that's excessive, for cops to get it perfect every time.

The trial is going to be dragged out though and they're probably going to try to force a guilty verdict. Thanks to the media the jury has already been tampered. Jury selection that's not biased will be very difficult. Names need to be protected as well across the board because intimidation is extreme. Any jury will be under intense intimidation. I am sure the name of Chauvin's lawyer isn't really Earl Gray. If that's his real name then my name is Taylors of Harrogate.

We also already know there is institutional bias. Forcing the charges is because of the autopsy which is meant to be independent. The second autopsy is purely for show and doesn't account for anything. It's troubling however that unlike the second autopsy the first is from a party that is supposed to be legitimate. The autopsy rules homicide but there's no basis for this in any of the physical findings. It's a completely baseless guess. The two happening at the same time does not mean it's causative. It would at best count as improbable homicide.

If the pathologist can be gotten to so to improperly rule homicide then why not the judge or anyone else? This sticks out like a sore thumb. They're just written homicide with no basis for it. Someone obviously wanted it to say that no matter what.

I think that kind of point falls apart in hindsight. People miss the original footage. It's often cut or otherwise edited.

When Floyd passes out Chauvin does check on him but he's also distracted by the hostile crowd which is being aggressive. At this point he has to pull out his mace.

Their attention is divided and the threat level is higher. This would have had an inhibiting effect and the cops were also aware the ambulance was only a minute out.

It wasn't just a hothead being threatening with his shouting, they also tried to interfere. It cannot be said at that point that it was four police officers dealing with a single suspect. They also comment on the crowd being hostile later in the footage.

The cops aren't necessarily medics and I don't think not providing CPR in those short tense moments should be something you want to set the standard that you go to prison on either murder or manslaughter chargers for. It's demanding a level of perfection that's extreme. Perhaps a reprimand would potentially be appropriate.

The woman might not have been pregnant. That may have been made up. It doesn't really make any difference. He wasn't an angel and certainly no saint.

The situation with the car is nonsense. A lot of it is. That's just what cops have to deal with. One minute he's fine in a car and is reluctant to get out. Then when it comes into getting into another car suddenly he's claustrophobic and can't breath. Had George Floyd gotten into that car then they could have hooked up with the ambulance quicker. Therefore he's guilty of his own manslaughter. Not to mention his own responsibility for his health and his state of intoxication.

The whole lot is just fucked up. It's all a democrat run shop and they're responsible for policing. Floyd was most responsible for his circumstances but after that Chinese imports (presumed for fentanyl) twice over. Also the only racist thing in all of this was if you listen carefully a woman in the original video was racially abusing Chauvin saying "It's the whites, this is what they do, they like messing with black people."

Other things about the situation are mind boggling. Like why they rip off the shop then just stay outside waiting to be caught. If you listen to the testimony of the three then they're like stooges, bumbling idiots.

That hothead in the crowd or at least one of them might have made things worse than you think. A shop attendant tried to tell the cops is was an OD. I think the shop attendant was also clued in from them being excessively intoxicated outside earlier or going in and out of the shop. The hothead bullied the shop attendant back inside.

If you also watch the trial Floyd wasn't alone. Believe it or not, the guy who was with him and also trying to pass the fake bill in an earlier attempt is apparently testifying. I crapped myself.

I've gone through the details extensively and I'm probably in around the same place as you. I can see things that could be done better, that's almost always the case in retrospect. I do not however see any failure significant enough to press charges. I think there's the assumption that any mistake and they're liable but I don't see that as being proportionate. It's demanding a standard that's excessive, for cops to get it perfect every time.

The trial is going to be dragged out though and they're probably going to try to force a guilty verdict. Thanks to the media the jury has already been tampered. Jury selection that's not biased will be very difficult. Names need to be protected as well across the board because intimidation is extreme. Any jury will be under intense intimidation. I am sure the name of Chauvin's lawyer isn't really Earl Gray. If that's his real name then my name is Taylors of Harrogate.

I think that kind of point falls apart in hindsight. People miss the original footage. It's often cut or otherwise edited.

When Floyd passes out Chauvin does check on him but he's also distracted by the hostile crowd which is being aggressive. At this point he has to pull out his mace.

Their attention is divided and the threat level is higher. This would have had an inhibiting effect and the cops were also aware the ambulance was only a minute out.

It wasn't just a hothead being threatening with his shouting, they also tried to interfere. It cannot be said at that point that it was four police officers dealing with a single suspect. They also comment on the crowd being hostile later in the footage.

The cops aren't necessarily medics and I don't think not providing CPR in those short tense moments should be something you want to set the standard that you go to prison on either murder or manslaughter chargers for. It's demanding a level of perfection that's extreme. Perhaps a reprimand would potentially be appropriate.

The woman might not have been pregnant. That may have been made up. It doesn't really make any difference. He wasn't an angel and certainly no saint.

The situation with the car is nonsense. A lot of it is. That's just what cops have to deal with. One minute he's fine in a car and is reluctant to get out. Then when it comes into getting into another car suddenly he's claustrophobic and can't breath. Had George Floyd gotten into that car then they could have hooked up with the ambulance quicker. Therefore he's guilty of his own manslaughter. Not to mention his own responsibility for his health and his state of intoxication.

The whole lot is just fucked up. It's all a democrat run shop and they're responsible for policing. Floyd was most responsible for his circumstances but after that Chinese imports (presumed for fentanyl) twice over. Also the only racist thing in all of this was if you listen carefully a woman in the original video was racially abusing Chauvin saying "It's the whites, this is what they do, they like messing with black people."

Other things about the situation are mind boggling. Like why they rip off the shop then just stay outside waiting to be caught. If you listen to the testimony of the three then they're like stooges, bumbling idiots.

That hothead in the crowd or at least one of them might have made things worse than you think. A shop attendant tried to tell the cops is was an OD. I think the shop attendant was also clued in from them being excessively intoxicated outside earlier or going in and out of the shop. The hothead bullied the shop attendant back inside.

If you also watch the trial Floyd wasn't alone. Believe it or not, the guy who was with him and also trying to pass the fake bill in an earlier attempt is apparently testifying. I crapped myself.

I've gone through the details extensively and I'm probably in around the same place as you. I can see things that could be done better, that's almost always the case in retrospect. I do not however see any failure significant enough to press charges. I think there's the assumption that any mistake and they're liable but I don't see that as being proportionate. It's demanding a standard that's excessive, for cops to get it perfect every time.

The trial is going to be dragged out though and they're probably going to try to force a guilty verdict. Thanks to the media the jury has already been tampered. Jury selection that's not biased will be very difficult.