Reason: Removed idiotic statement
I’m still confused. Was his reply basically his way of saying ‘I’m not allowed to comment on the specifics of the case under advisement from my lawyer’? I can see why he went with what he did.
229 days ago
5 score
Reason: Original
I’m still confused. Was his reply basically his way of saying ‘I’m not allowed to comment on the specifics of the case under advisement from my lawyer’? I can see why he went with what he did, as what typed requires intellect and some minimal education.
229 days ago
1 score