There are cases where an 18 year old was forced to register as a sex offender because the other was 17. I think a 5 year gap is reasonable, as long as a lower limit is set... But, I think 14 might be a bit low. It should be 16.
Spez: The bill is not yet passed out of the Assembly.
Per the bill history, it passed out of the Assembly committee on 8/20. On 8/24, the bill was read on the Assembly floor the second time, and ordered to the final(?) third reading. If I understand the history correctly, it passed the Senate back on 05/28/19.
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billHistoryClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB145
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billVotesClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB145
But, I think most may be missing the intent of the bill. You have to read the Bill Analysis, which I quoted here:
There are cases where an 18 year old was forced to register as a sex offender because the other was 17. I think a 5 year gap is reasonable, as long as a lower limit is set... But, I think 14 might be a bit low. It should be 16.
Spez: the OP's comment refers to a clause in the bill. It does not bear on whether the bill was enacted. The bill is not yet passed out of the Assembly.
Per the bill history, it passed out of the Assembly committee on 8/20. On 8/24, the bill was read on the Assembly floor the second time, and ordered to the final(?) third reading. If I understand the history correctly, it passed the Senate back on 05/28/19.
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billHistoryClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB145
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billVotesClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB145
But, I think most may be missing the intent of the bill. You have to read the Bill Analysis, which I quoted here:
There are cases where an 18 year old was forced to register as a sex offender because the other was 17. I think a 5 year gap is reasonable, as long as a lower limit is set... But, I think 14 might be a bit low. It should be 16.
Spez: the OP's comment refers to a clause in the bill. It does not bear on whether the bill was enacted. The bill is not yet passed out of the Assembly.
Per the bill history, it passed out of the Assembly committee on 8/20. On 8/24, the bill was read on the Assembly floor the second time, and ordered to the final(?) third reading. If I understand the history correctly, it passed the Senate back on 05/28/19.
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billHistoryClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB145
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billVotesClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB145
But, I think most may be missing the intent of the bill. You have to read the Bill Analysis, which I cited here:
There are cases where an 18 year old was forced to register as a sex offender because the other was 17. I think a 5 year gap is reasonable, as long as a lower limit is set... But, I think 14 might be a bit low. It should be 16.
Spez: the OP's comment refers to a clause in the bill. It does not bear on whether the bill was enacted. The bill is not yet passed out of the Assembly.
Per the bill history, it passed out of the Assembly committee on 8/20. On 8/24, the bill was read on the Assembly floor the second time, and ordered to the final(?) third reading. If I understand the history correctly, it passed the Senate back on 05/28/19.
But, I think most may be missing the intent of the bill. You have to read the Bill Analysis, which I cited here:
There are cases where an 18 year old was forced to register as a sex offender because the other was 17. I think a 5 year gap is reasonable, as long as a lower limit is set... But, I think 14 might be a bit low. It should be 16.
Spez: the OP's comment refers to a clause in the bill. It does not bear on whether the bill was enacted.
Per the bill history, it passed out of the Assembly committee on 8/20. On 8/24, the bill was read on the Assembly floor the second time, and ordered to the final(?) third reading. If I understand the history correctly, it passed the Senate back on 05/28/19.
But, I think most may be missing the intent of the bill. You have to read the Bill Analysis, which I cited here:
There are cases where an 18 year old was forced to register as a sex offender because the other was 17. I think a 5 year gap is reasonable, as long as a lower limit is set...
But, I think 14 might be a bit low. It should be 16.