Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

100% correct. What's even more insidious is that the racial component is just one major weapon they use, and "racism" is their mighty sword, but at the end of the day, it's all ideological bigotry, which makes it even more terrifying. Because even when you have the correct "identity" markers, or race, you can still be an enemy on ideological grounds. It blurs the lines of who their enemy is, and who to include in their genocide. Anyone can break from the ideology on something and suddenly find themselves going from an "ally" to being at the wrong end of the barrel.

Edit: though this is still identical to the Nazis. While Jews were essentially the ones targeted, it still fell on ideological grounds, and plenty of non-jews could find themselves in the same ghettos or camps for being dissenters, or not ideologically aligning. So at the end of the day, Jews were the easy target, easy to dehumanize and place blame, but ideological dissent was the main culprit; just as today, being white (and especially male) is the main target, and easy way to identify the enemy, but it's ultimately ideological. It explains best why so many whites are willing to be "allies" and vocalize their support, apologize for their whiteness and do everything to prove they're committed to the ideology and "antiracism" -- but they'll be first against the wall when the time comes, wishing they realized earlier what we all already know, just because they were so terrified of being labelled a "racist"

another edit: what's worse is this is actually making people racist. While I still remain not racist, and judge on character and not race, I've admittedly changed my views a lot. So while I still treat all equally, based on character, I do recognize the very real and present danger, and thus act accordingly, placing my own above all else (and "my own" isn't exclusive to race/identity/ethnicity -- though a major component -- but accounts for ideology as well, when identifying who the threat is). But others are becoming genuine racists, on both sides... something that wasn't even an issue until Obama wreaked havoc on this country and our culture

227 days ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

100% correct. What's even more insidious is that the racial component is just one major weapon they use, and "racism" is their mighty sword, but at the end of the day, it's all ideological bigotry, which makes it even more terrifying. Because even when you have the correct "identity" markers, or race, you can still be an enemy on ideological grounds. It blurs the lines of who their enemy is, and who to include in their genocide. Anyone can break from the ideology on something and suddenly find themselves going from an "ally" to being at the wrong end of the barrel.

Edit: though this is still identical to the Nazis. While Jews were essentially the ones targeted, it still fell on ideological grounds, and plenty of non-jews could find themselves in the same ghettos or camps for being dissenters, or not ideologically aligning. So at the end of the day, Jews were the easy target, easy to dehumanize and place blame, but ideological dissent was the main culprit; just as today, being white (and especially male) is the main target, and easy way to identify the enemy, but it's ultimately ideological. It explains best why so many whites are willing to be "allies" and vocalize their support, apologize for their whiteness and do everything to prove they're committed to the ideology and "antiracism" -- but they'll be first against the wall when the time comes, wishing they realized earlier what we all already know, just because they were so terrified of being labelled a "racist"

another edit: what's worse is this is actually making people racist. While I still remain not racist, and judge on character and not race, I've admittedly changed my views a lot. So while I still treat all equally, based on character, I do recognize the very real and present danger, and thus act accordingly, placing my own above all else (and "my own" isn't exclusive to race/identity/ethnicity -- thought a major component -- but accounts for ideology as well, when identifying who the threat is). But others are becoming genuine racists, on both sides... something that wasn't even an issue until Obama wreaked havoc on this country and our culture

227 days ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

100% correct. What's even more insidious is that the racial component is just one major weapon they use, and "racism" is their mighty sword, but at the end of the day, it's all ideological bigotry, which makes it even more terrifying. Because even when you have the correct "identity" markers, or race, you can still be an enemy on ideological grounds. It blurs the lines of who their enemy is, and who to include in their genocide. Anyone can break from the ideology on something and suddenly find themselves going from an "ally" to being at the wrong end of the barrel.

Edit: though this is still identical to the Nazis. While Jews were essentially the ones targeted, it still fell on ideological grounds, and plenty of non-jews could find themselves in the same ghettos or camps for being dissenters, or not ideologically aligning. So at the end of the day, Jews were the easy target, easy to dehumanize and place blame, but ideological dissent was the main culprit; just as today, being white (and especially male) is the main target, and easy way to identify the enemy, but it's ultimately ideological. It explains best why so many whites are willing to be "allies" and vocalize their support, apologize for their whiteness and do everything to prove they're committed to the ideology and "antiracism" -- but they'll be first against the wall when the time comes, wishing they realized earlier what we all already know, just because they were so terrified of being labelled a "racist"

227 days ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

100% correct. What's even more insidious is that the racial component is just one major weapon they use, and "racism" is their mighty sword, but at the end of the day, it's all ideological bigotry, which makes it even more terrifying. Because even when you have the correct "identity" markers, or race, you can still be an enemy on ideological grounds. It blurs the lines of who their enemy is, and who to include in their genocide. Anyone can break from the ideology on something and suddenly find themselves going from an "ally" to being at the wrong end of the barrel.

Edit: though this is still identical to the Nazis. While Jews were essentially the ones targeted, it still fell on ideological grounds, and plenty of non-jews could find themselves in the same ghettos or camps for being dissenters, or not ideologically aligning. So at the end of the day, Jews were the easy target, easy to dehumanize and place blame, but ideological dissent was the main culprit; just as today, being white (and especially male) is the main target, and easy way to identify the enemy, but it's ultimately ideological. It explains best why so many whites are willing to be "allies" and vocalize their support, apologize for their whiteness and do everything to prove they're committed to the ideology and "antiracism"

227 days ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

100% correct. What's even more insidious is that the racial component is just one major weapon they use, and "racism" is their mighty sword, but at the end of the day, it's all ideological bigotry, which makes it even more terrifying. Because even when you have the correct "identity" markers, or race, you can still be an enemy on ideological grounds. It blurs the lines of who their enemy is, and who to include in their genocide. Anyone can break from the ideology on something and suddenly find themselves going from an "ally" to being at the wrong end of the barrel.

Edit: though this is still identical to the Nazis. While Jews were essentially the ones targeted, it still fell on ideological grounds, and plenty of non-jews could find themselves in the same ghettos or camps for being dissenters, or not ideologically aligning

227 days ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

100% correct. What's even more insidious is that the racial component is just one major weapon they use, and "racism" is their mighty sword, but at the end of the day, it's all ideological bigotry, which makes it even more terrifying. Because even when you have the correct "identity" markers, or race, you can still be an enemy on ideological grounds. It blurs the lines of who their enemy is, and who to include in their genocide. Anyone can break from the ideology on something and suddenly find themselves going from an "ally" to being at the wrong end of the barrel.

Edit: though this is still identical to the Nazis. While Jews were essentially targeted, it still fell on ideological grounds, and plenty of non-jews could find themselves in the same ghettos or camps for being dissenters, or not ideologically aligning

227 days ago
2 score
Reason: Original

100% correct. What's even more insidious is that the racial component is just one major weapon they use, and "racism" is their mighty sword, but at the end of the day, it's all ideological bigotry, which makes it even more terrifying. Because even when you have the correct "identity" markers, or race, you can still be an enemy on ideological grounds. It blurs the lines of who their enemy is, and who to include in their genocide. Anyone can break from the ideology and suddenly find themselves going from an "ally" to being at the wrong end of the barrel

227 days ago
1 score