You're taking an event that happened decades ago, two years before an election in an era where there was no "instant access" of the internet to almost every human being on the planet (where it can be manipulated into anti-Trump "DRUMPF IS HITLER!" pieces and repeated ad infinitum) , as your evidence of saying it doesn't hurt re-election chances.

Context matters, your "evidence" is not evidence.

You're taking an event that happened decades ago, two years before an election in an era where there was no "instant access" of the internet to almost every human being on the planet, as your evidence of saying it doesn't hurt re-election chances.

Context matters, your "evidence" is not evidence.