It can be influenced just as much by John Locke though. Inalienable rights; the most basic among them is life. It's not ok to be for killing the most innocent among us whether religious or irreligious. The precedent is about as dangerous as they come. And the language of euphemisms they rely on to promote it is a repudiation of science.

They're terrible people, the pro choice crowd (/pro abortion crowd).......These are people who believe you can deliver a baby entirely except for the head, puncture the skull, suck the brains out and pronounce that a constitutional right has just been exercised. That really says it all.

It can be influenced just as much by John Locke though. Inalienable rights; the most basic among them is life. It's not ok to be for killing the most innocent among us whether religious or irreligious. The precedent is about as dangerous as they come. And the language of euphemisms they rely on to promote it a repudiation of science.

They're terrible people, the pro choice crowd (/pro abortion crowd).......These are people who believe you can deliver a baby entirely except for the head, puncture the skull, suck the brains out and pronounce that a constitutional right has just been exercised. That really says it all.

It can be influenced just as much by John Locke though. Inalienable rights; the most basic among them is life. It's not ok to be for killing the most innocent among us. The precedent is about as dangerous as they come.

They're terrible people, the pro choice crowd (/pro abortion crowd).......These are people who believe you can deliver a baby entirely except for the head, puncture the skull, suck the brains out and pronounce that a constitutional right has just been exercised. That really says it all.