Let me know when you get to the dismantling.

-Yes, it was 4 when it was 4. 1 when it was 1. It was more than 4 when you thought it was 4 and miscounted, and it was 8 when when it was 8. REEEEEEE. LOL! (He must of figured it would be bound to work on at least 1 person.) Critically the one with the most comments consistently is you, and was you at that time. Making it a nonsensical, imo childish and obvious attempted diversion from reality and the central topic on your part from the get go.

PRO TIP: If you're commenting most, you don't generally complain about someone's interest in what you said with far fewer comments, duh. Dismantling fail #1.

-Again ad hominem does not advance your argument any. It depreciates it. It's only an expression of your frustration. It shows you are seeking filler due to being short on substantive responses to the primary topic. It doesn't phase me for this reason. It is helpful to me.

-Oh I see. Replying methodically in one shot is "spamming" in your view but making several times more comments under the post over many hours and across multiple users as you consistently have is "not spamming" and thereby gets a positive connotation in your view? LOL too funny. Alternately how about I was focused and interested in what you were saying and not trolling people over 8 hours under one post. Do you think that is AS logical as your other arguments or do you deem it MORE so or LESS so in retrospect and why? I'll wait.

Again, pro choice necessarily = pro abortion. You are trying to have it all ways. Particularly foolish in a Republican heavy site. If you are on the right it would seem unlikely you would make this sort of miscalculation as leftists commonly do. I'm just sayin'.

-Yes I have always agreed that your argument is just that. It's not complicated. In actuality you are frustrated I understand what you are saying too much. I recognize what it means and have cut through your preferred way of spinning it and you don't like that. Good. You should not be supporting mass murder of innocent Americans on the basis of your faith belief they will commit thought crimes against the nation decades into the future for no valid scientific reason whatsoever. It is heinously anti-science. No amount of generic self-claims of it being based on valid credible "science" are going to hold up. You apparently realize this and aside from having no science to show-science you claim to be so familiar with it's cool to mass murder the innocent- you have yet to even make a weak attempt at finding something ad hoc to try to pass it off as what you were originally referring to LOL.

-Yes there are a long list of words, terms, and phrases for that you won't like being brought up in response, like aiding and abetting, Marxism, Saul Alinsky tactics, etc from various fields from the legal realm to social and political theory. Surely you understand even with low level crimes awareness and willful silence can result in long prison sentences for you. So mass murdering of the innocent because you believe they will commit thought crimes decades later is also pretty self-evident as QUITE FAR FROM OK as pertains to your own society. For this reason you are foolish to keep asking for them implicitly by repeatedly trying to pass that off as ok. Too many examples can be produced too easily to point out it's definitely not.

-No, while it's truly all too often the wrong comparison when people are quick to interject Hitler into political discussions, that would be except of course for where it directly applies.

-Exactly like you Adolf Hitler believed in the use of abortion for the purposes of Eugenics and genetic cleansing. Hitler believed in the forced "evolution" of humanity. He also believed in pursuing it through use of euphemisms and repetition of propagandistic linguistic games much as you are trying to have it both or all ways in your comments here where you support it but are also never encouraging it at various points when you seem to want to be able to say that for convenience in the next moment. The entire reason you are commenting so often under the post is your encouragement and support. You have then boxed yourself into owning that. Like a typical leftist you are trying to support it when you want and then keep claiming you aren't at all supporting it at the same time somehow. I doubt you'll get many buyers who wont instantly identify it on a Trump site whether you try to say you are conservative or not as leftist trolls often do.

-Among the "good people" Hitler ordered to be murdered were communists as you just argued and for that exact reason. So you see, you literally are making the same argument when you go on saying you hate communists so we should just keep quiet through their genetic cleansing via abortion / mass-murder.

-Like you, Hitler was not for abortion for himself either, dunce.

This was nothing other than rampant Darwinism eugenics— the elimination of millions of human beings branded ‘unfit/inferior’ by, and for the benefit of, those who regarded themselves as being ‘fit/superior’.

-There's nothing common sense about killing the innocent. You're making a fool of yourself on your own here bud.

-Killing an innocent person is promoting the denial of choice for the individuals entire lifespan. It is incontrovertibly anti-choice. Similarly you can say call prison a resort. It does not change the reality because you thought you could pull of being a manipulative liar by giving it pleasing sounding description. It actually just shows intent to deceive in addition to supporting something awful. Which makes it look even worse on your part bud.

Let me know when you get to the dismantling.

-Yes, it was 4 when it was 4. 1 when it was 1. It was more than 4 when you thought it was 4 and miscounted, and it was 8 when when it was 8. REEEEEEE. LOL! (He must of figured it would be bound to work on at least 1 person.) Critically the one with the most comments consistently is you, and was you at that time. Making it a nonsensical, imo childish and obvious attempted diversion from reality and the central topic on your part from the get go.

PRO TIP: If you're commenting most, you don't generally complain about someone's interest in what you said with far fewer comments, duh. Dismantling fail #1.

-Again ad hominem does not advance your argument any. It depreciates it. It's only an expression of your frustration. It shows you are seeking filler due to being short on substantive responses to the primary topic. It doesn't phase me for this reason. It is helpful to me.

-Oh I see. Replying methodically in one shot is "spamming" in your view but making several times more comments under the post over many hours and across multiple users as you consistently have is "not spamming" and thereby gets a positive connotation in your view? LOL too funny. Alternately how about I was focused and interested in what you were saying and not trolling people over 8 hours under one post. Do you think that is AS logical as your other arguments or do you deem it MORE so or LESS so in retrospect and why? I'll wait.

Again, pro choice necessarily = pro abortion. You are trying to have it all ways. Particularly foolish in a Republican heavy site. If you are on the right it would seem unlikely you would make this sort of miscalculation as leftists commonly do. I'm just sayin'.

-Yes I have always agreed that your argument is just that. It's not complicated. In actuality you are frustrated I understand what you are saying too much. I recognize what it means and have cut through your preferred way of spinning it and you don't like that. Good. You should not be supporting mass murder of innocent Americans on the basis of your faith belief they will commit thought crimes against the nation decades into the future for no valid scientific reason whatsoever. It is heinously anti-science. No amount of generic self-claims of it being based on valid credible "science" are going to hold up. You apparently realize this and aside from having no science to show-science you claim to be so familiar with it's cool to mass murder the innocent- you have yet to even make a weak attempt at finding something ad hoc to try to pass it off as what you were originally referring to LOL.

-Yes there are a long list of words, terms, and phrases for that you won't like being brought up in response, like aiding and abetting, Marxism, Saul Alinsky tactics, etc from various fields from the legal realm to social and political theory. Surely you understand even with low level crimes awareness and willful silence can result in long prison sentences for you. So mass murdering of the innocent because you believe they will commit thought crimes decades later is also pretty self-evident as QUITE FAR FROM OK as pertains to your own society. For this reason you are foolish to keep asking for them implicitly by repeatedly trying to pass that off as ok. Too many examples can be produced too easily to point out it's definitely not.

-No, while it's truly all too often the wrong comparison when people are quick to interject Hitler into political discussions, that would be except of course for where it directly applies.

-Exactly like you Adolf Hitler believed in the use of abortion for the purposes of Eugenics and genetic cleansing. Hitler believed in the forced "evolution" of humanity. He also believed in pursuing it through use of euphemisms and repetition of propagandistic linguistic games much as you are trying to have it both or all ways in your comments here where you support it but are also never encouraging it at various points when you seem to want to be able to say that for convenience in the next moment. The entire reason you are commenting so often under the post is your encouragement and support. You have then boxed yourself into owning that. Like a typical leftist you are trying to support it when you want and then keep claiming you aren't at all supporting it at the same time somehow. I doubt you'll get many buyers who wont instantly identify it on a Trump site whether you try to say you are conservative or not as leftist trolls often do.

-Among the "good people Hitler ordered to be murdered were communists as you just argued and for that exact reason. So you see, you literally are making the same argument when you go on saying you hate communists so we should just keep quiet through their genetic cleansing via abortion / mass-murder.

-Like you, Hitler was not for abortion for himself either, dunce.

This was nothing other than rampant Darwinism eugenics— the elimination of millions of human beings branded ‘unfit/inferior’ by, and for the benefit of, those who regarded themselves as being ‘fit/superior’.

-There's nothing common sense about killing the innocent. You're making a fool of yourself on your own here bud.

-Killing an innocent person is promoting the denial of choice for the individuals entire lifespan. It is incontrovertibly anti-choice. Similarly you can say call prison a resort. It does not change the reality because you thought you could pull of being a manipulative liar by giving it pleasing sounding description. It actually just shows intent to deceive in addition to supporting something awful. Which makes it look even worse on your part bud.

Let me know when you get to the dismantling.

-Yes, it was 4 when it was 4. 1 when it was 1. It was more than 4 when you thought it was 4 and miscounted, and it was 8 when when it was 8. REEEEEEE. LOL! (He must of figured it would be bound to work on at least 1 person.) Critically the one with the most comments consistently is you, and was you at that time. Making it a nonsensical, imo childish and obvious attempted diversion from reality and the central topic on your part from the get go.

PRO TIP: If you're commenting most, you don't generally complain about someone's interest in what you said with far fewer comments, duh. Dismantling fail #1.

-Again ad hominem does not advance your argument any. It depreciates it. It's only an expression of your frustration. It shows you are seeking filler due to being short on substantive responses to the primary topic. It doesn't phase me for this reason. It is helpful to me.

-Oh I see. Replying methodically in one shot is "spamming" in your view but making several times more comments under the post over many hours and across multiple users as you consistently have is "not spamming" and thereby gets a positive connotation in your view? LOL too funny. Alternately how about I was focused and interested in what you were saying and not trolling people over 8 hours under one post. Do you think that is AS logical as your other arguments or do you deem it MORE so or LESS so in retrospect and why? I'll wait.

Again, pro choice necessarily = pro abortion. You are trying to have it all ways. Particularly foolish in a Republican heavy site. If you are on the right it would seem unlikely you would make this sort of miscalculation as leftists commonly do. I'm just sayin'.

-Yes I have always agreed that your argument is just that. It's not complicated. In actuality you are frustrated I understand what you are saying too much. I recognize what it means and have cut through your preferred way of spinning it and you don't like that. Good. You should not be supporting mass murder of innocent Americans on the basis of your faith belief they will commit thought crimes against the nation decades into the future for no valid scientific reason whatsoever. It is heinously anti-science. No amount of generic self-claims of it being based on valid credible "science" are going to hold up. You apparently realize this and aside from having no science to show-science you claim to be so familiar with it's cool to mass murder the innocent- you have yet to even make a weak attempt at finding something ad hoc to try to pass it off as what you were originally referring to LOL.

-Yes there are a long list of words, terms, and phrases for that you won't like being brought up in response, like aiding and abetting, Marxism, Saul Alinsky tactics, etc from various fields from the legal realm to social and political theory. Surely you understand even with low level crimes awareness and willful silence can result in long prison sentences for you. So mass murdering of the innocent because you believe they will commit thought crimes decades later is also pretty self-evident as QUITE FAR FROM OK as pertains to your own society. For this reason you are foolish to keep asking for them implicitly by repeatedly trying to pass that off as ok. Too many examples can be produced too easily to point out it's definitely not.

-No, while it's truly all too often the wrong comparison when people are quick to interject Hitler into political discussions, that would be except of course for where it directly applies.

-Exactly like you Adolf Hitler believed in the use of abortion for the purposes of Eugenics and genetic cleansing. Hitler believed in the forced "evolution" of humanity. He also believed in pursuing it through use of euphemisms and repetition of propagandistic linguistic games much as you are trying to have it both or all ways in your comments here where you support it but are also never encouraging it at various points when you seem to want to be able to say that for convenience in the next moment. The entire reason you are commenting so often under the post is your encouragement and support. You have then boxed yourself into owning that. Like a typical leftist you are trying to support it when you want and then keep claiming you aren't at all supporting it at the same time somehow. I doubt you'll get many buyers who wont instantly identify it on a Trump site whether you try to say you are conservative or not as leftist trolls often do.

-Among the "good people Hitler ordered to be murdered were communists as you just argued and for that exact reason. So you see, you literally are making the same argument when you go on saying you hate communists so we should just keep quiet through their genetic cleansing via abortion / mass-murder.

-Like you, Hitler was not for abortion for himself either, dunce.

This was nothing other than rampant Darwinism eugenics— the elimination of millions of human beings branded ‘unfit/inferior’ by, and for the benefit of, those who regarded themselves as being ‘fit/superior’.

-There's nothing common sense about killing the innocent. You're making a fool of yourself on your own here bud.

-Killing an innocent person is promoting the denial of choice for the individuals entire lifespan. It is incontrovertibly anti-choice. Similarly you can say call prison a resort. It does not change the reality because you thought you could pull of being a manipulative liar by giving it pleasing sounding description. It actually just shows intent to deceive in addition to supporting something awful. Which makes it look even worse on your part bud.

Let me know when you get to the dismantling.

-Yes, it was 4 when it was 4. 1 when it was 1. It was more than 4 when you thought it was 4 and miscounted, and it was 8 when when it was 8. REEEEEEE. LOL! (He must of figured it would be bound to work on at least 1 person.) Critically the one with the most comments consistently is you, and was you at that time. Making it a nonsensical, imo childish and obvious attempted diversion from reality and the central topic on your part from the get go.

PRO TIP: If you're commenting most, you don't generally complain about someone's interest in what you said with far fewer comments, duh. Dismantling fail #1.

-Again ad hominem does not advance your argument any. It depreciates it. It's only an expression of your frustration. It shows you are seeking filler due to being short on substantive responses to the primary topic. It doesn't phase me for this reason. It is helpful to me.

-Oh I see. Replying methodically in one shot is "spamming" in your view but making several times more comments under the post over many hours and across multiple users as you consistently have is "not spamming" and thereby gets a positive connotation in your view? LOL too funny. Alternately how about I was focused and interested in what you were saying and not trolling people over 8 hours under one post. Do you think that is AS logical as your other arguments or do you deem it MORE so or LESS so in retrospect and why? I'll wait.

Again, pro choice necessarily = pro abortion. You are trying to have it all ways. Particularly foolish in a Republican heavy site. If you are on the right it would seem unlikely you would make this sort of miscalculation as leftists commonly do. I'm just sayin'.

-Yes I have always agreed that your argument is just that. It's not complicated. In actuality you are frustrated I understand what you are saying too much. I recognize what it means and have cut through your preferred way of spinning it and you don't like that. Good. You should not be supporting mass murder of innocent Americans on the basis of your faith belief they will commit thought crimes against the nation decades into the future for no valid scientific reason whatsoever. It is heinously anti-science. No amount of generic self-claims of it being based on valid credible "science" are going to hold up. You apparently realize this and aside from having no science to show-science you claim to be so familiar with it's cool to mass murder the innocent- you have yet to even make a weak attempt at finding something ad hoc to try to pass it off as what you were originally referring to LOL.

-Yes there are a long list of words, terms, and phrases for that you won't like being brought up in response, like aiding and abetting, Marxism, Saul Alinsky tactics, etc from various fields from the legal realm to social and political theory. Surely you understand even with low level crimes awareness and willful silence can result in long prison sentences for you. So mass murdering of the innocent because you believe they will commit thought crimes decades later is also pretty self-evident as QUITE FAR FROM OK as pertains to your own society. For this reason you are foolish to keep asking for them implicitly by repeatedly trying to pass that off as ok. Too many examples can be produced too easily to point out it's definitely not.

-No, while it's truly all too often the wrong comparison when people are quick to interject Hitler into political discussions, that would be except of course for where it directly applies.

-Exactly like you Adolf Hitler believed in the use of abortion for the purposes of Eugenics and genetic cleansing. Hitler believed in the forced "evolution" of humanity. He also believed in pursuing it through use of euphemisms and repetition of propagandistic linguistic games much as you are trying to have it both or all ways in your comments here where you support it but are also never encouraging it at various points when you seem to want to be able to say that for convenience in the next moment. The entire reason you are commenting so often under the post is your encouragement and support. You have then boxed yourself into owning that. Like a typical leftist you are trying to support it when you want and then keep claiming you aren't at all supporting it at the same time somehow. I doubt you'll get many buyers who wont instantly identify it on a Trump site whether you try to say you are conservative or not as leftist trolls often do.

-Among the "good people Hitler ordered to be murdered were communists as you just argued and for that exact reason. So you see, you literally are making the same argument when you go on saying you hate communists so we should just keep quiet through their genetic cleansing via abortion / mass-murder.

-Like you, Hitler was not for abortion for himself either, dunce.

This was nothing other than rampant Darwinism eugenics— the elimination of millions of human beings branded ‘unfit/inferior’ by, and for the benefit of, those who regarded themselves as being ‘fit/superior’.

-There's nothing common sense about killing the innocent. You're making a fool of yourself on your own here bud.

-Killing an innocent person is promoting the denial of choice for the individuals entire lifespan. It is incontrovertibly anti-choice. Similarly you can say call prison a resort. It does not change the reality because you thought you could pull of being a manipulative liar by giving it pleasing sounding description. It actually just shows intent to deceive in addition to supporting something awful. Which makes it look even worse on your part bud.

Let me know when you get to the dismantling.

-Yes, it was 4 when it was 4. 1 when it was 1. It was more than 4 when you thought it was 4 and miscounted, and it was 8 when when it was 8. REEEEEEE. LOL! (He must of figured it would be bound to work on at least 1 person.) Critically the one with the most comments consistently is you, and was you at that time. Making it a nonsensical, imo childish and obvious attempted diversion from reality and the central topic on your part from the get go.

PRO TIP: If you're commenting most, you don't generally complain about someone's interest in what you said with far fewer comments, duh. Dismantling fail #1.

-Again ad hominem does not advance your argument any. It depreciates it. It's only an expression of your frustration. It shows you are seeking filler due to being short on substantive responses to the primary topic. It doesn't phase me for this reason. It is helpful to me.

-Oh I see. Replying methodically in one shot is "spamming" in your view but making several times more comments under the post over many hours and across multiple users as you consistently have is "not spamming" and thereby gets a negative connotation in your view? LOL too funny. Alternately how about I was focused and interested in what you were saying and not trolling people over 8 hours under one post. Do you think that is AS logical as your other arguments or do you deem it MORE so or LESS so in retrospect and why? I'll wait.

Again, pro choice necessarily = pro abortion. You are trying to have it all ways. Particularly foolish in a Republican heavy site. If you are on the right it would seem unlikely you would make this sort of miscalculation as leftists commonly do. I'm just sayin'.

-Yes I have always agreed that your argument is just that. It's not complicated. In actuality you are frustrated I understand what you are saying too much. I recognize what it means and have cut through your preferred way of spinning it and you don't like that. Good. You should not be supporting mass murder of innocent Americans on the basis of your faith belief they will commit thought crimes against the nation decades into the future for no valid scientific reason whatsoever. It is heinously anti-science. No amount of generic self-claims of it being based on valid credible "science" are going to hold up. You apparently realize this and aside from having no science to show-science you claim to be so familiar with it's cool to mass murder the innocent- you have yet to even make a weak attempt at finding something ad hoc to try to pass it off as what you were originally referring to LOL.

-Yes there are a long list of words, terms, and phrases for that you won't like being brought up in response, like aiding and abetting, Marxism, Saul Alinsky tactics, etc from various fields from the legal realm to social and political theory. Surely you understand even with low level crimes awareness and willful silence can result in long prison sentences for you. So mass murdering of the innocent because you believe they will commit thought crimes decades later is also pretty self-evident as QUITE FAR FROM OK as pertains to your own society. For this reason you are foolish to keep asking for them implicitly by repeatedly trying to pass that off as ok. Too many examples can be produced too easily to point out it's definitely not.

-No, while it's truly all too often the wrong comparison when people are quick to interject Hitler into political discussions, that would be except of course for where it directly applies.

-Exactly like you Adolf Hitler believed in the use of abortion for the purposes of Eugenics and genetic cleansing. Hitler believed in the forced "evolution" of humanity. He also believed in pursuing it through use of euphemisms and repetition of propagandistic linguistic games much as you are trying to have it both or all ways in your comments here where you support it but are also never encouraging it at various points when you seem to want to be able to say that for convenience in the next moment. The entire reason you are commenting so often under the post is your encouragement and support. You have then boxed yourself into owning that. Like a typical leftist you are trying to support it when you want and then keep claiming you aren't at all supporting it at the same time somehow. I doubt you'll get many buyers who wont instantly identify it on a Trump site whether you try to say you are conservative or not as leftist trolls often do.

-Among the "good people Hitler ordered to be murdered were communists as you just argued and for that exact reason. So you see, you literally are making the same argument when you go on saying you hate communists so we should just keep quiet through their genetic cleansing via abortion / mass-murder.

-Like you, Hitler was not for abortion for himself either, dunce.

This was nothing other than rampant Darwinism eugenics— the elimination of millions of human beings branded ‘unfit/inferior’ by, and for the benefit of, those who regarded themselves as being ‘fit/superior’.

-There's nothing common sense about killing the innocent. You're making a fool of yourself on your own here bud.

-Killing an innocent person is promoting the denial of choice for the individuals entire lifespan. It is incontrovertibly anti-choice. Similarly you can say call prison a resort. It does not change the reality because you thought you could pull of being a manipulative liar by giving it pleasing sounding description. It actually just shows intent to deceive in addition to supporting something awful. Which makes it look even worse on your part bud.

Let me know when you get to the dismantling.

-Yes, it was 4 when it was 4. 1 when it was 1. It was more than 4 when you thought it was 4 and miscounted, and it was 8 when when it was 8. REEEEEEE. LOL! (He must of figured it would be bound to work on at least 1 person.) Critically the one with the most comments consistently is you, and was you at that time. Making it a nonsensical, imo childish and obvious attempted diversion from reality and the central topic on your part from the get go.

PRO TIP: If you're commenting most, you don't generally complain about someone's interest in what you said with far fewer comments, duh. Dismantling fail #1.

-Again ad hominem does not advance your argument any. It depreciates it. It's only an expression of your frustration. It shows you are seeking filler due to being short on substantive responses to the primary topic. It doesn't phase me for this reason. It is helpful to me.

-Oh I see. Replying methodically in one shot is "spamming" in your view but making several times more comments under the post over many hours and across multiple users as you consistently have is "not spamming" and get a negative connotation in your view? LOL too funny. Alternately how about I was focused and interested in what you were saying and not trolling people over 8 hours under one post. Do you think that as logical as your other arguments or do you deem it more so or less so in retrospect and why? I'll wait.

Again, pro choice necessarily = pro abortion. You are trying to have it all ways. Particularly foolish in a Republican heavy site. If you are on the right it would seem unlikely you would make this sort of miscalculation as leftists commonly do. I'm just sayin'.

-Yes I have always agreed that your argument is just that. It's not complicated. In actuality you are frustrated I understand what you are saying too much. I recognize what it means and have cut through your preferred way of spinning it and you don't like that. Good. You should not be supporting mass murder of innocent Americans on the basis of your faith belief they will commit thought crimes against the nation decades into the future for no valid scientific reason whatsoever. It is heinously anti-science. No amount of generic self-claims of it being based on valid credible "science" are going to hold up. You apparently realize this and aside from having no science to show-science you claim to be so familiar with it's cool to mass murder the innocent- you have yet to even make a weak attempt at finding something ad hoc to try to pass it off as what you were originally referring to LOL.

-Yes there are a long list of words, terms, and phrases for that you won't like being brought up in response, like aiding and abetting, Marxism, Saul Alinsky tactics, etc from various fields from the legal realm to social and political theory. Surely you understand even with low level crimes awareness and willful silence can result in long prison sentences for you. So mass murdering of the innocent because you believe they will commit thought crimes decades later is also pretty self-evident as QUITE FAR FROM OK as pertains to your own society. For this reason you are foolish to keep asking for them implicitly by repeatedly trying to pass that off as ok. Too many examples can be produced too easily to point out it's definitely not.

-No, while it's truly all too often the wrong comparison when people are quick to interject Hitler into political discussions, that would be except of course for where it directly applies.

-Exactly like you Adolf Hitler believed in the use of abortion for the purposes of Eugenics and genetic cleansing. Hitler believed in the forced "evolution" of humanity. He also believed in pursuing it through use of euphemisms and repetition of propagandistic linguistic games much as you are trying to have it both or all ways in your comments here where you support it but are also never encouraging it at various points when you seem to want to be able to say that for convenience in the next moment. The entire reason you are commenting so often under the post is your encouragement and support. You have then boxed yourself into owning that. Like a typical leftist you are trying to support it when you want and then keep claiming you aren't at all supporting it at the same time somehow. I doubt you'll get many buyers who wont instantly identify it on a Trump site whether you try to say you are conservative or not as leftist trolls often do.

-Among the "good people Hitler ordered to be murdered were communists as you just argued and for that exact reason. So you see, you literally are making the same argument when you go on saying you hate communists so we should just keep quiet through their genetic cleansing via abortion / mass-murder.

-Like you, Hitler was not for abortion for himself either, dunce.

This was nothing other than rampant Darwinism eugenics— the elimination of millions of human beings branded ‘unfit/inferior’ by, and for the benefit of, those who regarded themselves as being ‘fit/superior’.

-There's nothing common sense about killing the innocent. You're making a fool of yourself on your own here bud.

-Killing an innocent person is promoting the denial of choice for the individuals entire lifespan. It is incontrovertibly anti-choice. Similarly you can say call prison a resort. It does not change the reality because you thought you could pull of being a manipulative liar by giving it pleasing sounding description. It actually just shows intent to deceive in addition to supporting something awful. Which makes it look even worse on your part bud.

Let me know when you get to the dismantling.

-Yes, it was 4 when it was 4. 1 when it was 1. It was more than 4 when you thought it was 4 and miscounted, and it was 8 when it when it was 8. REEEEEEE. (He must of figured it would be bound to work on at least 1 person.) Critically the one with the most comments consistently is you, and was you at that time. Making it a nonsensical, imo childish attempted diversion from reality and the central topics on your part from the get go.

PRO TIP: If you're commenting most, you don't generally complain about someone's interest in what you said with so far fewer comments, duh. Dismantling fail #1.

-Again ad hominem does not advance your argument any. It depreciates it. It's only an expression of your frustration. It shows you are seeking filler due to being short on substantive responses to the primary topic. It doesn't phase me for this reason. It is helpful to me.

-Oh I see. Replying methodically in one shot is "spamming" in your view but making several times more comments under the post over many hours and across multiple users as you consistently have is "not spamming" and get a negative connotation in your view? LOL too funny. Alternately how about I was focused and interested in what you were saying and not trolling people over 8 hours under one post. Do you think that as logical as your other arguments or do you deem it more so or less so in retrospect and why? I'll wait.

Again, pro choice necessarily = pro abortion. You are trying to have it all ways. Particularly foolish in a Republican heavy site. If you are on the right it would seem unlikely you would make this sort of miscalculation as leftists commonly do. I'm just sayin'.

-Yes I have always agreed that your argument is just that. It's not complicated. In actuality you are frustrated I understand what you are saying too much. I recognize what it means and have cut through your preferred way of spinning it and you don't like that. Good. You should not be supporting mass murder of innocent Americans on the basis of your faith belief they will commit thought crimes against the nation decades into the future for no valid scientific reason whatsoever. It is heinously anti-science. No amount of generic self-claims of it being based on valid credible "science" are going to hold up. You apparently realize this and aside from having no science to show-science you claim to be so familiar with it's cool to mass murder the innocent- you have yet to even make a weak attempt at finding something ad hoc to try to pass it off as what you were originally referring to LOL.

-Yes there are a long list of words, terms, and phrases for that you won't like being brought up in response, like aiding and abetting, Marxism, Saul Alinsky tactics, etc from various fields from the legal realm to social and political theory. Surely you understand even with low level crimes awareness and willful silence can result in long prison sentences for you. So mass murdering of the innocent because you believe they will commit thought crimes decades later is also pretty self-evident as QUITE FAR FROM OK as pertains to your own society. For this reason you are foolish to keep asking for them implicitly by repeatedly trying to pass that off as ok. Too many examples can be produced too easily to point out it's definitely not.

-No, while it's truely all too often the wrong comparison when people are quick to interject Hitler into political discussions, that would be except of course for where it directly applies.

-Exactly like you Adolf Hitler believed in the use of abortion for the purposes of Eugenics and genetic cleansing. Hitler believed in the forced "evolution" of humanity. He also believed in pursuing it through use of euphemisms and repetition of propagandistic linguistic games much as you are trying to have it both or all ways in your comments here where you support it but are also never encouraging it at various points when you seem to want to be able to say that for convenience in the next moment. The entire reason you are commenting so often under the post is your encouragement and support. You have then boxed yourself into owning that. Like a typical leftist you are trying to support it when you want and then keep claiming you aren't at all supporting it at the same time somehow. I doubt you'll get many buyers who wont instantly identify it on a Trump site whether you try to say you are conservative or not as leftist trolls often do.

-Among the "good people Hitler ordered to be murdered were communists as you just argued and for that exact reason. So you see, you literally are making the same argument when you go on saying you hate communists so we should just keep quiet through their genetic cleansing via abortion / mass-murder.

-Like you, Hitler was not for abortion for himself either, dunce.

This was nothing other than rampant Darwinism eugenics— the elimination of millions of human beings branded ‘unfit/inferior’ by, and for the benefit of, those who regarded themselves as being ‘fit/superior’.

-There's nothing common sense about killing the innocent. You're making a fool of yourself on your own here bud.

-Killing an innocent person is promoting the denial of choice for the individuals entire lifespan. It is incontrovertibly anti-choice. Similarly you can say call prison a resort. It does not change the reality because you thought you could pull of being a manipulative liar by giving it pleasing sounding description. It actually just shows intent to deceive in addition to supporting something awful. Which makes it look even worse on your part bud.