Trump is bombastic and sarcastic and focused and clever. But he can also turn the sarcasm off and speak very directly. His mind does run several major loops at all times, some in anticipation of what he is about to say and some reviewing what he has just said, that is why he can (and often does) go "off the prompter" when he is reading one to deliver a tangent, then whether prompted or not, can get back to where he left off.

As Scott Adams has pointed out -- the Charlottesville Hoax is a major study of his now -- during the contentious and uproarious press conference Trump's phrase "... and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, 'cause they should be condemned totally..." this is solid evidence of Trump's parallel thinking.

52 seconds had elapsed after he had introduced the "very fine people on both sides" talking point and one of these mental loops -- one that evaluates how his already spoken words might be perceived and might interrupt his thought process to suggest a clarification -- fired, and he interrupted his thought to deliver the clarification and resumed the thought. This was a moment of superior mental prowess under pressure.

When you realize how this context was always there, you realize that people who only perceive the Charlotteville Hoax are only using a small part of their brain, a tiny literal bit that puts them on the same level as angry rodents.

These are mental attributes I value in friends also. To seize a moment to deliver a good sarcasm you need be running a thought loop in advance of your spoken words. To point out irony in what you have just said or clarify it, you need a loop running after your words.

Bolton interpreted Trump's use of the term "love letters" as literally as an angry rodent would. Or maybe a dead rodent. The wheel was still spinning but the hamster was dead.

Trump is bombastic and sarcastic and focused and clever. But he can also turn the sarcasm off and speak very directly. His mind does run several major loops at all times, some in anticipation of what he is about to say and some reviewing what he has just said, that is why he can (and often does) go "off the prompter" when he is reading one to deliver a tangent, then whether prompted or not, can get back to where he left off.

As Scott Adams has pointed out -- the Charlottesville Hoax is a major study of his now -- during the contentious and uproarious press conference Trump's phrase "... and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, 'cause they should be condemned totally..." this is solid evidence of Trump's parallel thinking.

52 seconds had elapsed after he had introduced the "very fine people on both sides" talking point and one of these mental loops -- one that evaluates how his already spoken words might be perceived and might interrupt his thought process to suggest a clarification -- fired, and he interrupted his thought to deliver the clarification and resumed the thought. This was a moment of superior mental prowess under pressure.

When you realize how this context was always there, you realize that people who only perceive the Charlotteville Hoax are only using a small part of their brain, a tiny literal bit that puts them on the same level as angry rodents.

These are mental attributes I value in friends also. To seize a moment to deliver a good sarcasm you need be running a thought loop in advance of your spoken words. To point out irony in what you have just said or clarify it, you need a loop running behind your words.

Bolton interpreted Trump's use of the term "love letters" as literally as an angry rodent would. Or maybe a dead rodent. The wheel was still spinning but the hamster was dead.

Trump is bombastic and sarcastic and focused and clever. But he can also turn the sarcasm off and speak very directly. His mind does run several major loops at all times, some in anticipation of what he is about to say and some reviewing what he has just said, that is why he can (and often does) go "off the prompter" when he is reading one to deliver a tangent, then whether prompted or not, can get back to where he left off.

As Scott Adams has pointed out -- the Charlottesville Hoax is a major study of his now -- during the contentious and uproarious press conference Trump's phrase "... and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, 'cause they should be condemned totally..." this is solid evidence of Trump's parallel thinking.

52 seconds had elapsed after he had introduced the "very fine people on both sides" talking point and one of these mental loops -- one that evaluates how his already spoken words might be perceived and might interrupt his thought process to suggest a clarification -- fired, and he interrupted his thought to deliver the clarification and resumed the thought. This was a moment of superior mental prowess under pressure.

When you realize how this context was always there, you realize that people who only perceive the Charlotteville Hoax are only using a small part of their brain, a tiny literal bit that puts them on the same level as angry rodents.

These are mental attributes I value in friends also. To seize a moment to deliver a good sarcasm you need be running a thought loop in advance of your spoken words. To point out irony in what you have just said or clarify it, you need a loop running behind your words.

Bolton interpreted Trump's use of the term "love letters" as an angry rodent would. Or maybe a dead rodent. The wheel was still spinning but the hamster was dead.

Trump is bombastic and sarcastic and focused and clever. But he can also turn the sarcasm off and speak very directly. His mind does run several major loops at all times, some in anticipation of what he is about to say and some reviewing what he has just said, that is why he can (and often does) go "off the prompter" when he is reading one to deliver a tangent, then whether prompted or not, can get back to where he left off.

As Scott Adams has pointed out -- the Charlottesville Hoax is a major study of his now -- during the contentious and uproarious press conference Trump's phrase "... and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, 'cause they should be condemned totally..." this is solid evidence of Trump's parallel thinking.

52 seconds had elapsed after he had introduced the "very fine people on both sides" talking point and one of these mental loops -- one that evaluates how his already spoken words might be perceived and might interrupt his thought process to suggest a clarification -- fired, and he interrupted his thought to deliver the clarification and resumed the thought. This was a moment of superior mental prowess under pressure.

When you realize how this context was always there, you realize that people who only perceive the Charlotteville Hoax are only using a small part of their brain, a tiny literal bit that puts them on the same level as angry rodents.

These are mental attributes I value in friends also. To seize a moment to deliver a good sarcasm you need be running a thought loop in advance of your spoken words. To point out irony in what you have just said or clarify it, you need a loop running behind your words.