Then no. You aren't. Not only literally but you didnt even assimilate -by your own words-

Americans trace their lineage via descendants of the british colonies with few exceptions from then to now such as the irish, some french and i suppose African Americans who trace their lineage to those times.

Anything else is revisionist globalism history. Nb4 you literally say revionist history "its about muh ideology"

As if Romanians fought against the British colony in the revolution.

Then no. You aren't.

Americans trace their lineage via descendants of the british colonies with few exceptions from then to now such as the irish, some french and i suppose African Americans who trace their lineage to those times.

Anything else is revisionist globalism history. Nb4 you literally say revionist history "its about muh ideology"

As if Romanians fought against the British colony in the revolution.

Then no. You aren't.

Americans trace their lineage via descendants of the british colonies with few exceptions from then to now such as the irish, some french and i suppose African Americans who trace their lineage to those times.

Anything else is revisionist globalism history. Nb4 you literally say revionist history "its about muh ideology"

As if Romanians fought in the British colony.

Then no. You aren't.

Americans trace their lineage via descendants of the british colonies with few exceptions from then to now such as the irish, some french and i suppose African Americans who trace their lineage to those times.

Anything else is revisionist globalism history. Nb4 you literally say revionist history "its about muh ideology"

Then no. You aren't.

Americans trace their lineage via descendants of the british colonies with few exceptions from then to now.

Anything else is revisionist globalism history.