Sorry, you show remarkable civility. It puts me to shame and I know I deserve it for being so involved in the topic to be as hostile as I was. I apologize.

We may agree on most things, but we seem to disagree on the topic that is wedging this nation apart - Nature vs Nurture. An argument as old as time, Nature vs Nurture has always stirred up debate as to the share of influence each one has, but to insist that Nature has NO influence on behavior/intelligence is extremism on a historically recognizable level.

The notion that there is no difference between the races and that "we are all the same" is the swan song that Globalism has used since 1965 to push mass immigration and condemn every movement that has dared to preserve white culture. Your stance is the same one championed by the Left to erode the ideological foundation of America through both demographic change and the suppression of racial awareness. You would do well to remember that the Founding Fathers recognized the part that biology played in the founding and direction of the nation. White landowning males only were to vote. Such a thing is unthinkable today, but it ensured that only those with "skin in the game" (both hereditary and financial) could determine the direction of the nation, and it indisputably guided us through our formative years. The results of all policies implemented from your stance have resulted only in cultural friction, crime, and suffering. By what results do you justify your beliefs as valid? Genetics and psychology certainly don't justify them.

The root of your argument seems to be a cautionary one that seeks to prevent people from viewing difference with hatred, but to insist that the difference doesn't exist in the first place is a denial of natural reality. To seek to erase those differences that nature bestowed upon us, through the aforementioned policies, is a perversion of nature that I can't tolerate (not that you do, but that is the action being taken by those with the power to take your stance in earnest stride).

I am still of the stance that character is more valuable than race, but that doesn't motivate me to entirely dismiss or seek to destroy natural diversity to protect the emotions of those who may be perceived as 'inferior' when a civilization is allowed to maintain racial awareness. To deny Nature's role in molding humanity entirely is absolute, and such an absolute belief has never aligned with the right wing, nor with 99.9% of humans to ever live and die since the dawn of civilization. It is on those grounds of absolute and historically unprecedented belief that I condemned you earlier.

Sorry, you show remarkable civility. It puts me to shame and I know I deserve it for being so involved in the topic to be as hostile as I was. I apologize.

We may agree on most things, but we seem to disagree on the topic that is wedging this nation apart - Nature vs Nurture. An argument as old as time, Nature vs Nurture has always stirred up debate as to the share of influence each one has, but to insist that Nature has NO influence on behavior/intelligence is extremism on a historically recognizable level.

The notion that there is no difference between the races and that "we are all the same" is the swan song that Globalism has used since 1965 to push mass immigration and condemn every movement that has dared to preserve white culture. Your stance is the same one championed by the Left to erode the ideological foundation of America through both demographic change and the suppression of racial awareness. You would do well to remember that the Founding Fathers recognized the part that biology played in the founding and direction of the nation. White landowning males only were to vote. Such a thing is unthinkable today, but it ensured that only those with "skin in the game" (both hereditary and financial) could determine the direction of the nation, and it indisputably guided us through our formative years. The results of all policies implemented from your stance have resulted only in cultural friction, crime, and suffering. By what results do you justify your beliefs as valid? Science certainly doesn't justify them.

The root of your argument seems to be a cautionary one that seeks to prevent people from viewing difference with hatred, but to insist that the difference doesn't exist in the first place is a denial of natural reality. To seek to erase those differences that nature bestowed upon us, through the aforementioned policies, is a perversion of nature that I can't tolerate (not that you do, but that is the action being taken by those with the power to take your stance in earnest stride).

I am still of the stance that character is more valuable than race, but that doesn't motivate me to entirely dismiss or seek to destroy natural diversity to protect the emotions of those who may be perceived as 'inferior' when a civilization is allowed to maintain racial awareness. To deny Nature's role in molding humanity entirely is absolute, and such an absolute belief has never aligned with the right wing, nor with 99.9% of humans to ever live and die since the dawn of civilization. It is on those grounds of absolute and historically unprecedented belief that I condemned you earlier.

Sorry, you show remarkable civility. It puts me to shame and I know I deserve it for being so involved in the topic to be as hostile as I was. I apologize.

We may agree on most things, but we seem to disagree on the topic that is wedging this nation apart - Nature vs Nurture. An argument as old as time, Nature vs Nurture has always stirred up debate as to the share of influence each one has, but to insist that Nature has NO influence on behavior/intelligence is extremism on a historically recognizable level.

The notion that there is no difference between the races and that "we are all the same" is the swan song that Globalism has used since 1965 to push mass immigration and condemn every movement that has dared to preserve white culture. Your stance is the same one championed by the Left to erode the ideological foundation of America through both demographic change and the suppression of racial awareness. You would do well to remember that the Founding Fathers recognized the part that biology played in the founding and direction of the nation. White landowning males only were to vote. Such a thing is unthinkable today, but it ensured that only those with "skin in the game" (both hereditary and financial) could determine the direction of the nation, and it indisputably guided us through our formative years. The results of all policies implemented from your stance have resulted only in cultural friction and suffering. By what results do you justify your beliefs as valid? Science certainly doesn't justify them.

The root of your argument seems to be a cautionary one that seeks to prevent people from viewing difference with hatred, but to insist that the difference doesn't exist in the first place is a denial of natural reality. To seek to erase those differences that nature bestowed upon us, through the aforementioned policies, is a perversion of nature that I can't tolerate (not that you do, but that is the action being taken by those with the power to take your stance in earnest stride).

I am still of the stance that character is more valuable than race, but that doesn't motivate me to entirely dismiss or seek to destroy natural diversity to protect the emotions of those who may be perceived as 'inferior' when a civilization is allowed to maintain racial awareness. To deny Nature's role in molding humanity entirely is absolute, and such an absolute belief has never aligned with the right wing, nor with 99.9% of humans to ever live and die since the dawn of civilization. It is on those grounds of absolute and historically unprecedented belief that I condemned you earlier.

Sorry, you show remarkable civility. It puts me to shame and I know I deserve it for being so involved in the topic to be as hostile as I was. I apologize.

We may agree on most things, but we seem to disagree on the topic that is wedging this nation apart - Nature vs Nurture. An argument as old as time, Nature vs Nurture has always stirred up debate as to the share of influence each one has, but to insist that Nature has NO influence on behavior/intelligence is extremism on a historically recognizable level.

The notion that there is no difference between the races and that "we are all the same" is the swan song that Globalism has used since 1965 to push mass immigration and condemn every movement that has dared to preserve white culture. Your stance is the same one championed by the Left to erode the ideological foundation of America through both demographic change and the suppression of racial awareness. You would do well to remember that the Founding Fathers recognized the part that biology played in the founding and direction of the nation. White landowning males only were to vote. Such a thing is unthinkable today, but it ensured that only those with "skin in the game" (both hereditary and financial) could determine the direction of the nation, and it indisputably guided us through our formative years.

The root of your argument seems to be a cautionary one that seeks to prevent people from viewing difference with hatred, but to insist that the difference doesn't exist in the first place is a denial of natural reality. To seek to erase those differences that nature bestowed upon us, through the aforementioned policies, is a perversion of nature that I can't tolerate (not that you do, but that is the action being taken by those with the power to take your stance in earnest stride).

I am still of the stance that character is more valuable than race, but that doesn't motivate me to entirely dismiss or seek to destroy natural diversity to protect the emotions of those who may be perceived as 'inferior' when a civilization is allowed to maintain racial awareness. To deny Nature's role in molding humanity entirely is absolute, and such an absolute belief has never aligned with the right wing, nor with 99.9% of humans to ever live and die since the dawn of civilization. It is on those grounds of absolute and historically unprecedented belief that I condemned you earlier.

Sorry dude, you show remarkable civility. It puts me to shame and I know I deserve it for being so involved in the topic to be as hostile as I was. I apologize.

We may agree on most things, but we seem to disagree on the topic that is wedging this nation apart - Nature vs Nurture. An argument as old as time, Nature vs Nurture has always stirred up debate as to the share of influence each one has, but to insist that Nature has NO influence on behavior/intelligence is extremism on a historically recognizable level.

The notion that there is no difference between the races and that "we are all the same" is the swan song that Globalism has used since 1965 to push mass immigration and condemn every movement that has dared to preserve white culture. Your stance is the same one championed by the Left to erode the ideological foundation of America through both demographic change and the suppression of racial awareness. You would do well to remember that the Founding Fathers recognized the part that biology played in the founding and direction of the nation. White landowning males only were to vote. Such a thing is unthinkable today, but it ensured that only those with "skin in the game" (both hereditary and financial) could determine the direction of the nation, and it indisputably guided us through our formative years.

The root of your argument seems to be a cautionary one that seeks to prevent people from viewing difference with hatred, but to insist that the difference doesn't exist in the first place is a denial of natural reality. To seek to erase those differences that nature bestowed upon us, through the aforementioned policies, is a perversion of nature that I can't tolerate (not that you do, but that is the action being taken by those with the power to take your stance in earnest stride).

I am still of the stance that character is more valuable than race, but that doesn't motivate me to entirely dismiss or seek to destroy natural diversity to protect the emotions of those who may be perceived as 'inferior' when a civilization is allowed to maintain racial awareness. To deny Nature's role in molding humanity entirely is absolute, and such an absolute belief has never aligned with the right wing, nor with 99.9% of humans to ever live and die since the dawn of civilization. It is on those grounds of absolute and historically unprecedented belief that I condemned you earlier.

Sorry dude, you show remarkable civility. It puts me to shame and I know I deserve it for being so involved in the topic to be as hostile as I was. I apologize.

We may agree on most things, but we seem to disagree on the topic that is wedging this nation apart - Nature vs Nurture. An argument as old as time, Nature vs Nurture has always stirred up debate as to the share of influence each one has, but to insist that Nature has NO influence on behavior/intelligence is extremism on a historically recognizable level.

The notion that there is no difference between the races and that "we are all the same" is the swan song that Globalism has used since 1965 to push mass immigration and condemn every movement that has dared to preserve white culture. Your stance is the same one championed by the Left to erode the ideological foundation of America through both demographic change and the suppression of racial awareness. You would do well to remember that the Founding Fathers recognized the part that biology played in the founding and direction of the nation. White landowning males only were to vote. Such a thing is unthinkable today, but it ensured that only those with "skin in the game" (both hereditary and financial) could determine the direction of the nation, and it indisputably guided us through our formative years.

The root of your argument seems to be a cautionary one that seeks to prevent people from viewing difference with hatred, but to insist that the difference doesn't exist in the first place is a denial of natural reality. To seek to erase those differences that nature bestowed upon us, through the aforementioned policies, is a perversion of nature that I can't tolerate (not that you do, but that is the action being taken by those with the power to take your stance in earnest stride).

I am still of the stance that character is more valuable than race, but that doesn't motivate me to entirely dismiss or seek to destroy natural diversity to protect the emotions of those who may be perceived as 'inferior' when a civilization is allowed to maintain racial awareness. To deny Nature's role in molding humanity entirely is absolute, and such an absolute belief has never aligned with the right wing, nor with 99.9% of humans to ever live and die since the dawn of civilization. It is on those grounds of absolute belief that I condemned you earlier.

Sorry dude, you show remarkable civility. It puts me to shame and I know I deserve it for being so involved in the topic to be as hostile as I was. I apologize.

We may agree on most things, but we seem to disagree on the topic that is wedging this nation apart - Nature vs Nurture. An argument as old as time, Nature vs Nurture has always stirred up debate as to the share of influence each one has, but to insist that Nature has NO influence on behavior/intelligence is extremism on a historically recognizable level.

The notion that there is no difference between the races and that "we are all the same" is the swan song that Globalism has used since 1965 to push mass immigration and condemn every movement that has dared to preserve white culture. Your stance is the same one championed by the Left to erode the ideological foundation of America through both demographic change and the suppression of racial awareness. You would do well to remember that the Founding Fathers recognized the part that biology played in the founding and direction of the nation. White landowning males only were to vote. Such a thing is unthinkable today, but it ensured that only those with "skin in the game" (both hereditary and financial) could determine the direction of the nation, and it indisputably guided us through our formative years.

The root of your argument seems to be a cautionary one that seeks to prevent people from viewing difference with hatred, but to insist that the difference doesn't exist in the first place is a denial of natural reality. To seek to erase those differences that nature bestowed upon us, through the aforementioned policies, is a perversion of nature that I can't tolerate (not that you do, but that is the action being taken by those with the power to take your stance in earnest stride).

I am still of the stance that character is more valuable than race, but that doesn't motivate me to entirely dismiss or seek to destroy natural diversity to protect the emotions of those who may be perceived as 'inferior' when a civilization is allowed to maintain racial awareness. To deny Nature's role in molding humanity entirely is absolute, and such an absolute belief has never aligned with the right wing, nor with 99.9% of humans to ever live and die since the dawn of civilization.

Sorry dude, you show remarkable civility. It puts me to shame and I know I deserve it for being so involved in the topic to be as hostile as I was. I apologize.

We may agree on most things, but we seem to disagree on the topic that is wedging this nation apart - Nature vs Nurture. An argument as old as time, Nature vs Nurture has always stirred up debate as to the share of influence each one has, but to insist that Nature has NO influence on behavior/intelligence is extremism on a historically recognizable level.

The notion that there is no difference between the races and that "we are all the same" is the swan song that Globalism has used since 1965 to push mass immigration and condemn every movement that has dared to preserve white culture. Your stance is the same one championed by the Left to erode the ideological foundation of America through both demographic change and the suppression of racial awareness. You would do well to remember that the Founding Fathers recognized the part that biology played in the founding and direction of the nation. White landowning males only were to vote. Such a thing is unthinkable today, but it ensured that only those with "skin in the game" (both hereditary and financial) could determine the direction of the nation, and it indisputably guided us through our formative years.

The root of your argument seems to be a cautionary one that seeks to prevent people from viewing difference with hatred, but to insist that the difference doesn't exist in the first place is a denial of natural reality. To seek to erase those differences that nature bestowed upon us, through the aforementioned policies, is a perversion of nature that I can't tolerate (not that you do, but that is the action being taken by those with the power to take your stance in earnest stride).

I am still of the stance that character is more valuable than race, but that doesn't motivate me to entirely dismiss or seek to destroy natural diversity to protect the emotions of those who may be perceived as 'inferior' when society is allowed to maintain racial awareness. To deny Nature's role in molding humanity entirely is absolute, and such an absolute belief has never aligned with the right wing, nor with 99.9% of humans to ever live and die since the dawn of civilization.

Sorry dude, you show remarkable civility. It puts me to shame and I know I deserve it for being so involved in the topic to be as hostile as I was. I apologize.

We may agree on most things, but we seem to disagree on the topic that is wedging this nation apart - Nature vs Nurture. An argument as old as time, Nature vs Nurture has always stirred up debate as to the share of influence each one has, but to insist that Nature has NO influence on behavior/intelligence is extremism on a historically recognizable level.

The notion that there is no difference between the races and that "we are all the same" is the swan song that Globalism has used since 1965 to push mass immigration and condemn every movement that has dared to preserve white culture. Your stance is the same one championed by the Left to erode the ideological foundation of America through both demographic change and the suppression of racial awareness. You would do well to remember that the Founding Fathers recognized the part that biology played in the founding and direction of the nation. White landowning males only were to vote. Such a thing is unthinkable today, but it ensured that only those with "skin in the game" (both hereditary and financial) could determine the direction of the nation, and it indisputably guided us through our formative years.

The root of your argument seems to be a cautionary one that seeks to prevent people from viewing difference with hatred, but to insist that the difference doesn't exist in the first place is a denial of natural reality. To seek to erase those differences that nature bestowed upon us, through the aforementioned policies, is a perversion of nature that I can't tolerate (not that you do, but that is the action being taken by those with the power to take your stance in earnest stride).

I am still of the stance that character is more valuable than race, but that doesn't motivate me to entirely dismiss or seek to destroy natural diversity to protect the emotions of those who may be perceived as 'inferior'. To deny Nature's role in molding humanity entirely is absolute, and such an absolute belief has never aligned with the right wing, nor with 99.9% of humans to ever live and die since the dawn of civilization.

Sorry dude, you show remarkable civility. It puts me to shame and I know I deserve it for being so involved in the topic to be as hostile as I was. I apologize.

We may agree on most things, but we seem to disagree on the topic that is wedging this nation apart - Nature vs Nurture. An argument as old as time, Nature vs Nurture has always stirred up debate as to the share of influence each one has, but to insist that Nature has NO influence on behavior/intelligence is extremism on a historically recognizable level.

The notion that there is no difference between the races and that "we are all the same" is the swan song that Globalism has used since 1965 to push mass immigration and condemn every movement that has dared to preserve white culture since then. Your stance is the same one championed by the Left to erode the ideological foundation of America through both demographic change and the suppression of racial awareness. You would do well to remember that the Founding Fathers recognized the part that biology played in the founding and direction of the nation. White landowning males only were to vote. Such a thing is unthinkable today, but it ensured that only those with "skin in the game" (both hereditary and financial) could determine the direction of the nation, and it indisputably guided us through our formative years.

The root of your argument seems to be a cautionary one that seeks to prevent people from viewing difference with hatred, but to insist that the difference doesn't exist in the first place is a denial of natural reality. To seek to erase those differences that nature bestowed upon us, through the aforementioned policies, is a perversion of nature that I can't tolerate (not that you do, but that is the action being taken by those with the power to take your stance in earnest stride).

I am still of the stance that character is more valuable than race, but that doesn't motivate me to entirely dismiss or seek to destroy natural diversity to protect the emotions of those who may be perceived as 'inferior'. To deny Nature's role in molding humanity entirely is absolute, and such an absolute belief has never aligned with the right wing, nor with 99.9% of humans to ever live and die since the dawn of civilization.

Sorry dude, you show remarkable civility. It puts me to shame and I know I deserve it for being so involved in the topic to be as hostile as I was. I apologize.

We may agree on most things, but we seem to disagree on the topic that is wedging this nation apart - Nature vs Nurture. An argument as old as time, Nature vs Nurture has always stirred up debate as to the share of influence each one has, but to insist that Nature has NO influence on behavior/intelligence is extremism on a historically recognizable level.

The notion that there is no difference between the races and that "we are all the same" is the swan song that Globalism has used since 1965 to push mass immigration and condemn every movement that has dared to preserve white culture since then. Your stance is the same one championed by the Left to erode the ideological foundation of America through both demographic change and the suppression of racial awareness. You would do well to remember that the Founding Fathers recognized the part that biology played in the founding and direction of the nation. White landowning males only were to vote. Such a thing is unthinkable today, but it ensured that only those with "skin in the game" (both hereditary and financial) could determine the direction of the nation, and it guided us through our early years.

The root of your argument seems to be a cautionary one that seeks to prevent people from viewing difference with hatred, but to insist that the difference doesn't exist in the first place is a denial of natural reality. To seek to erase those differences that nature bestowed upon us, through the aforementioned policies, is a perversion of nature that I can't tolerate (not that you do, but that is the action being taken by those with the power to take your stance in earnest stride).

I am still of the stance that character is more valuable than race, but that doesn't motivate me to entirely dismiss or seek to destroy natural diversity to protect the emotions of those who may be perceived as 'inferior'. To deny Nature's role in molding humanity entirely is absolute, and such an absolute belief has never aligned with the right wing, nor with 99.9% of humans to ever live and die since the dawn of civilization.

Sorry dude, you show remarkable civility. It puts me to shame and I know I deserve it for being so involved in the topic to be as hostile as I was. I apologize.

We may agree on most things, but we seem to disagree on the topic that is wedging this nation apart - Nature vs Nurture. An argument as old as time, Nature vs Nurture has always stirred up debate as to the share of influence each one has, but to insist that Nature has NO influence on behavior/intelligence is extremism on a historically recognizable level.

The notion that there is no difference between the races and that "we are all the same" is the swan song that Globalism has used since 1965 to push mass immigration and condemn every movement that has dared to preserve white culture since then. Your stance is the same one championed by the Left to erode the ideological foundation of America through both demographic change and the suppression of racial awareness. You would do well to remember that the Founding Fathers recognized the part that biology played in the founding and direction of the nation. White landowning males only were to vote. Such a thing is unthinkable today, but it ensured that only those with "skin in the game" (both hereditary and financial) could determine the direction of the nation.

The root of your argument seems to be a cautionary one that seeks to prevent people from viewing difference with hatred, but to insist that the difference doesn't exist in the first place is a denial of natural reality. To seek to erase those differences that nature bestowed upon us, through the aforementioned policies, is a perversion of nature that I can't tolerate (not that you do, but that is the action being taken by those with the power to take your stance in earnest stride).

I am still of the stance that character is more valuable than race, but that doesn't motivate me to entirely dismiss or seek to destroy natural diversity to protect the emotions of those who may be perceived as 'inferior'. To deny Nature's role in molding humanity entirely is absolute, and such an absolute belief has never aligned with the right wing, nor with 99.9% of humans to ever live and die since the dawn of civilization.

Sorry dude, you show remarkable civility. It puts me to shame and I know I deserve it for being so involved in the topic to be as hostile as I was. I apologize.

We may agree on most things, but we seem to disagree on the topic that is wedging this nation apart - Nature vs Nurture. An argument as old as time, Nature vs Nurture has always stirred up debate as to the share of influence each one has, but to insist that Nature has NO influence on behavior/intelligence is extremism on a historically recognizable level.

The notion that there is no difference between the races and that "we are all the same" is the swan song that Globalism has used since 1965 to push mass immigration and condemn every movement that has dared to preserve white culture since then. Your stance is the same one championed by the Left to erode the ideological foundation of America through both demographic change and the suppression of racial awareness. You would do well to remember that the Founding Fathers recognized the part that biology played in the founding and direction of the nation. White landowning males only were to vote. Such a thing is unthinkable today, but it ensured that only those with "skin in the game" (both hereditary and financial) could determine the direction of the nation.

The root of your argument seems to be a cautionary one that seeks to prevent people from viewing difference with hatred, but to insist that the difference doesn't exist in the first place is a denial of natural reality. To seek to erase those differences that nature bestowed upon us, through the aforementioned policies, is a perversion of nature that I can't tolerate (not that you do, but that is the action being taken by those with the power to take your stance in earnest stride).

I am still of the stance that character is more valuable than race, but that doesn't motivate me to entirely dismiss or seek to destroy natural diversity to protect the emotions of those who may be perceived as 'inferior'. To deny Nature's role in molding humanity entirely is absolute, and such an absolute belief does not align with the modern right wing, nor with 99.9% of humans to ever live and die since the dawn of civilization.

Sorry dude, you show remarkable civility. It puts me to shame and I know I deserve it for being so involved in the topic to be as hostile as I was. I apologize.

We may agree on most things, but we seem to disagree on the topic that is wedging this nation apart - Nature vs Nurture. An argument as old as time, Nature vs Nurture has always stirred up debate as to the share of influence each one has, but to insist that Nature has NO influence on behavior/intelligence is extremism on a historically recognizable level.

The notion that there is no difference between the races and that "we are all the same" is the swan song that Globalism has used since 1965 to push mass immigration and condemn every movement that has dared to preserve white culture since then. Your stance is the same one championed by the Left to erode the ideological foundation of America through both demographic change and the suppression of racial awareness. You would do well to remember that the Founding Fathers recognized the part that biology played in the founding and direction of the nation. White landowning males only were to vote. Such a thing is unthinkable today, but it ensured that only those with "skin in the game" (both hereditary and financial) could determine the direction of the nation.

The root of your argument seems to be a cautionary one that seeks to prevent people from viewing difference with hatred, but to insist that the difference doesn't exist in the first place is a denial of natural reality. To seek to erase those differences that nature bestowed upon us, through the aforementioned policies, is a perversion of nature that I can't tolerate (not that you do, but that is the action being taken by those with the power to take your stance in earnest stride).

I am still of the stance that character is more valuable than race, but that doesn't motivate me to entirely dismiss or seek to destroy natural diversity. To deny Nature's role in molding humanity entirely is absolute, and such an absolute belief does not align with the modern right wing, nor with 99.9% of humans to ever live and die since the dawn of civilization.

Sorry dude, you show remarkable civility. It puts me to shame and I know I deserve it for being so involved in the topic to be as hostile as I was. I apologize.

We may agree on most things, but we seem to disagree on the topic that is wedging this nation apart - Nature vs Nurture. An argument as old as time, Nature vs Nurture has always stirred up debate as to the share of influence each one has, but to insist that Nature has NO influence on behavior/intelligence is extremism on a historically recognizable level.

The notion that there is no difference between the races and that "we are all the same" is the swan song that Globalism has used since 1965 to push mass immigration and condemn every movement that has dared to preserve white culture since then. Your stance is the same one championed by the Left to erode the ideological foundation of America through both demographic change and the suppression of racial awareness. You would do well to remember that the Founding Fathers recognized the part that biology played in the founding and direction of the nation. White landowning males only were to vote. Such a thing is unthinkable today, but it ensured that only those with "skin in the game" (both hereditary and financial) could determine the direction of the nation.

The root of your argument seems to be a cautionary one that seeks to prevent people from viewing difference with hatred, but to insist that the difference doesn't exist in the first place is a denial of natural reality. To seek to erase those differences that nature bestowed upon us, through the aforementioned policies, is a perversion of nature that I can't tolerate (not that you do, but that is the action being taken by those with the power to take your stance in earnest stride).

I am still of the stance that character is more valuable than race, but that doesn't motivate me to entirely dismiss or seek to destroy natural diversity. To deny Nature's role in moulding humanity entirely is absolute, and such an absolute belief does not align with the modern right wing, nor with 99.9% of humans to ever live and die since the dawn of civilization.

Sorry dude, you show remarkable civility. It puts me to shame and I know I deserve it for being so involved in the topic to be as hostile as I was. I apologize.

We may agree on most things, but we seem to disagree on the topic that is wedging this nation apart - Nature vs Nurture. An argument as old as time, Nature vs Nurture has always stirred up debate as to the share of influence each one has, but to insist that Nature has NO influence on behavior/intelligence is extremism on a historically recognizable level.

The notion that there is no difference between the races and that "we are all the same" is the swan song that Globalism has used since 1965 to push mass immigration and condemn every movement that has dared to preserve white culture since then. Your stance is the same one championed by the Left to erode the ideological foundation of America through both demographic change and the suppression of racial awareness. You would do well to remember that the Founding Fathers recognized the part that biology played in the founding and direction of the nation. White landowning males only were to vote. Such a thing is unthinkable today, but it ensured that only those with "skin in the game" (both hereditary and financial) could determine the direction of the nation.

The root of your argument seems to be a cautionary one that seeks to prevent people from viewing difference with hatred, but to insist that the difference doesn't exist in the first place is a denial of natural reality. To seek to erase those differences that nature bestowed upon us, through the aforementioned policies, is a perversion of nature that I can't tolerate (not that you do, but that is the action being taken by those with the power to take your stance in earnest stride).

I am still of the stance that character is more valuable than race, but that doesn't motivate me to entirely dismiss or seek to destroy natural diversity. To deny Nature entirely is absolute, and such an absolute belief does not align with the modern right wing, nor with 99.9% of humans to ever live and die since the dawn of civilization.

Sorry dude, you show remarkable civility. It puts me to shame and I know I deserve it for being so involved in the topic to be as hostile as I was. I apologize.

We may agree on most things, but we seem to disagree on the topic that is wedging this nation apart - Nature vs Nurture. An argument as old as time, Nature vs Nurture has always stirred up debate as to the share of influence each one has, but to insist that Nature has NO influence on behavior/intelligence is extremism on a historically recognizable level.

The notion that there is no difference between the races and that "we are all the same" is the swan song that Globalism has used since 1965 to push mass immigration and condemn every movement that has dared to preserve white culture since then. Your stance is the same one championed by the Left to erode the ideological foundation of America through both demographic change and the suppression of racial awareness. You would do well to remember that the Founding Fathers recognized the part that biology played in the founding and direction of the nation. White landowning males only were to vote. Such a thing is unthinkable today, but it ensured that only those with "skin in the game" (both hereditary and financial) could determine the direction of the nation.

The root of your argument seems to be a cautionary one that seeks to prevent people from viewing difference with hatred, but to insist that the difference doesn't exist in the first place is a denial of natural reality. To seek to erase those differences that nature bestowed upon us, through the aforementioned policies, is a perversion of nature that I can't tolerate (not that you do, but that is the action being taken by those with the power to take your stance in earnest stride).

I am still of the stance that character is more valuable than race, but that doesn't motivate me to entirely dismiss or seek to destroy natural diversity. To deny Nature entirely is absolute, and such an absolute belief does not align with the modern right wing, nor with 99.9% of humans to live and die since the dawn of civilization.

Sorry dude, you show remarkable civility. It puts me to shame and I know I deserve it for being so involved in the topic to be as hostile as I was. I apologize.

We may agree on most things, but we seem to disagree on the topic that is wedging this nation apart - Nature vs Nurture. An argument as old as time, Nature vs Nurture has always stirred up debate as to the share of influence each one has, but to insist that Nature has NO influence on behavior/intelligence is extremism on a historically recognizable level.

The notion that there is no difference between the races and that "we are all the same" is the swan song that Globalism has used since 1965 to push mass immigration and condemn every movement that has dared to preserve white culture since then. Your stance is the same one championed by the Left to erode the ideological foundation of America through both demographic change and the suppression of racial awareness. You would do well to remember that the Founding Fathers recognized the part that biology played in the founding and direction of the nation. White landowning males only were to vote. Such a thing is unthinkable today, but it ensured that only those with "skin in the game" (both hereditary and financial) could determine the direction of the nation.

The root of your argument seems to be a cautionary one that seeks to prevent people from viewing difference with hatred, but to insist that the difference doesn't exist in the first place is a denial of natural reality. To seek to erase those differences that nature bestowed upon us, through the aforementioned policies, is a perversion of nature that I can't tolerate (not that you do, but that is the action being taken by those with the power to take your stance in earnest stride).

I am still of the stance that character is more valuable than race, but that doesn't motivate me to entirely dismiss or seek to destroy natural diversity. To deny Nature entirely is absolute.

Sorry dude, you show remarkable civility. It puts me to shame and I know I deserve it for being so involved in the topic to be as hostile as I was. I apologize.

We may agree on most things, but we seem to disagree on the topic that is wedging this nation apart - Nature vs Nurture. An argument as old as time, Nature vs Nurture has always stirred up debate as to the share of influence each one has, but to insist that Nature has NO influence on behavior/intelligence is extremism on a historically recognizable level.

The notion that there is no difference between the races and that "we are all the same" is the swan song that Globalism has used since 1965 to push mass immigration and condemn every movement that has dared to preserve white culture since then. Your stance is the same one championed by the Left to erode the ideological foundation of America through both demographic change and the suppression of racial awareness. You would do well to remember that the Founding Fathers recognized the part that biology played in the founding and direction of the nation. White landowning males only were to vote. Such a thing is unthinkable today, but it ensured that only those with "skin in the game" (both hereditary and financial) could determine the direction of the nation.

The root of your argument seems to be a cautionary one that seeks to prevent people from viewing difference with hatred, but to insist that the difference doesn't exist in the first place is a denial of natural reality. To seek to erase those differences that nature bestowed upon us, through the aforementioned policies, is a perversion of nature that I can't tolerate (not that you do, but that is the action being taken by those with the power to take your stance in earnest stride).

I am still of the stance that character is more valuable than race, but that doesn't motivate me to dismiss or seek to destroy natural diversity.

Sorry dude, you show remarkable civility. It puts me to shame and I know I deserve it for being so involved in the topic to be as hostile as I was. I apologize.

We may agree on most things, but we seem to disagree on the topic that is wedging this nation apart - Nature vs Nurture. An argument as old as time, Nature vs Nurture has always stirred up debate as to the share of influence each one has, but to insist that Nature has NO influence on behavior/intelligence is extremism on a historically recognizable level.

The notion that there is no difference between the races and that "we are all the same" is the swan song that Globalism has used since 1965 to push mass immigration and condemn every movement that has dared to preserve white culture since then. Your stance is the same one championed by the Left to erode the ideological foundation of America through both demographic change and the suppression of racial awareness.

The root of your argument seems to be a cautionary one that seeks to prevent people from viewing difference with hatred, but to insist that the difference doesn't exist in the first place is a denial of natural reality. To seek to erase those differences that nature bestowed upon us, through the aforementioned policies, is a perversion of nature that I can't tolerate (not that you do, but that is the action being taken by those with the power to take your stance in earnest stride).

I am still of the stance that character is more valuable than race, but that doesn't motivate me to dismiss or seek to destroy natural diversity.

Sorry dude, you show remarkable civility. It puts me to shame and I know I deserve it for being so involved in the topic to be as hostile as I was. I apologize.

We may agree on most things, but we seem to disagree on the topic that is wedging this nation apart - Nature vs Nurture. An argument as old as time, Nature vs Nurture has always stirred up debate as to the share of influence each one has, but to insist that Nature has NO influence on behavior/intelligence is extremism on a historically recognizable level.

The notion that there is no difference between the races and that "we are all the same" is the swan song that Globalism has used since 1965 to push mass immigration and condemn every movement that has dared to preserve white culture since then. Your stance is the same one championed by the Left to erode the ideological foundation of America through both demographic change and the suppression of racial awareness.

The root of your argument seems to be a cautionary one that seeks to prevent people from viewing difference with hatred, but to insist that the difference doesn't exist in the first place is folly. To seek to erase those differences, through the aforementioned policies, is evil (not that you do, but that is the actions being taken by those who take your stance in earnest stride).

I am still of the stance that character is more valuable than race, but that doesn't motivate me to dismiss natural reality.