it's more complicated, plausible deniability. The director was walking down the French Road and saw young girls Twerking like this she was disgusted and claim she made the movie to show the world was happening to young children the plot of the movie is what is critical. the director claims: "the internet is teaching our kids sexuality and it is causing mass degeneracy". But that is also perfect plausible deniability..

it's centers around a young Muslim girl whose father is getting a second wife into a home and she is mad, finds an Internet room that has a French girl showing her body off to simping men. The director is trying to make it clear that these young girls are stupid and don't understand culture and sexuality and see this girls sexual movements in her bedroom video broadcast to men and she believes this is the way you're supposed to act and start copying the moves of the sexual girl and makes it into a dance and the rest of the girls join in.

The movie ends with them doing a big sexual dance on stage and the Muslim girl having a moment of weakening and realizing what she did and she runs off crying .

The director claims the movie is supposed to expose what's happening to our youth in the world and How disgusting it is but if you're going to make a movie about animal abuse you do not abuse animals in the actual movie and this is what they're doing so the contention is correct the movie is showing child abuse in the movies gone too far but the biggest story is correct the director claims they made it to expose it but we all agree that just sounds like an excuse so either way if they're telling the truth or not the movie is wrong, and everything else is just noise Obama/Netflix created for plausible deniability while they protect pedos.

it's more complicated, plausible deniability. The director was walking down the French Road and saw young girls Twerking like this she was disgusted and claim she made the movie to show the world was happening to young children the plot of the movie is what is critical. the director claims: "the internet is teaching our kids sexuality and it is causing mass degeneracy". But that is also perfect plausible deniability..

it's centers around a young Muslim girl whose father is getting a second wife into a home and she finds an Internet room that has a French girl showing her body off to simping men. The director is trying to make it clear that these young girls are stupid and don't understand culture and sexuality and see this girls sexual movements in her bedroom video broadcast to men and she believes this is the way you're supposed to act and start copying the moves of the sexual girl and makes it into a dance and the rest of the girls join in.

The movie ends with them doing a big sexual dance on stage and the Muslim girl having a moment of weakening and realizing what she did and she runs off crying .

The director claims the movie is supposed to expose what's happening to our youth in the world and How disgusting it is but if you're going to make a movie about animal abuse you do not abuse animals in the actual movie and this is what they're doing so the contention is correct the movie is showing child abuse in the movies gone too far but the biggest story is correct the director claims they made it to expose it but we all agree that just sounds like an excuse so either way if they're telling the truth or not the movie is wrong, and everything else is just noise Obama/Netflix created for plausible deniability while they protect pedos.

it's more complicated, plausible deniability. The director was walking down the French Road and saw young girls Twerking like this she was disgusted and claim she made the movie to show the world was happening to young children the plot of the movie is what is critical.

it's centers around a young Muslim girl whose father is getting a second wife into a home and she finds an Internet room that has a French girl showing her body off to simping men. The director is trying to make it clear that these young girls are stupid and don't understand culture and sexuality and see this girls sexual movements in her bedroom video broadcast to men and she believes this is the way you're supposed to act and start copying the moves of the sexual girl and makes it into a dance and the rest of the girls join in.

The movie ends with them doing a big sexual dance on stage and the Muslim girl having a moment of weakening and realizing what she did and she runs off crying .

The director claims the movie is supposed to expose what's happening to our youth in the world and How disgusting it is but if you're going to make a movie about animal abuse you do not abuse animals in the actual movie and this is what they're doing so the contention is correct the movie is showing child abuse in the movies gone too far but the biggest story is correct the director claims they made it to expose it but we all agree that just sounds like an excuse so either way if they're telling the truth or not the movie is wrong, and everything else is just noise Obama/Netflix created for plausible deniability while they protect pedos.

it's more complicated, plausible deniability. The director was walking down the French Road and saw young girls Twerking like this she was disgusted and claim she made the movie to show the world was happening to young children the plot of the movie is what is critical. it's centers around a young Muslim girl whose father is getting a second wife into a home and she finds an Internet room that has a French girl showing her body off to simping men. The director is trying to make it clear that these young girls are stupid and don't understand culture and sexuality and see this girls sexual movements in her bedroom video broadcast to men and she believes this is the way you're supposed to act and start copying the moves of the sexual girl and makes it into a dance and the rest of the girls join in. The movie ends with them doing a big sexual dance on stage and the Muslim girl having a moment of weakening and realizing what she did and she runs off crying . The director claims the movie is supposed to expose what's happening to our youth in the world and How disgusting it is but if you're going to make a movie about animal abuse you do not abuse animals in the actual movie and this is what they're doing so the contention is correct the movie is showing child abuse in the movies gone too far but the biggest story is correct the director claims they made it to expose it but we all agree that just sounds like an excuse so either way if they're telling the truth or not the movie is wrong, and everything else is just noise Obama/Netflix created for plausible deniability while they protect pedos.

it's more complicated, plausible deniability. The director was walking down the French Road and saw young girls Twerking like this she was disgusted and claim she made the movie to show the world was happening to young children the plot of the movie is what is critical. it's centers around a young Muslim girl whose father is getting a second wife into a home and she finds an Internet room that has a French girl showing her body off to simping men. The director is trying to make it clear that these young girls are stupid and don't understand culture and sexuality and see this girls sexual movements in her bedroom video broadcast to men and she believes this is the way you're supposed to act and start copying the moves of the sexual girl and makes it into a dance and the rest of the girls join in. The movie ends with them doing a big sexual dance on stage and the Muslim girl having a moment of weakening and realizing what she did and she runs off crying . The director claims the movie is supposed to expose what's happening to our youth in the world and How disgusting it is but if you're going to make a movie about animal abuse you do not abuse animals in the actual movie and this is what they're doing so the contention is correct the movie is showing child abuse in the movies gone too far but the biggest story is correct the director claims they made it to expose it but we all agree that just sounds like an excuse so either way if they're telling the truth or not the movie is wrong