Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Certainly not. If morals were part of the constitution, then Trump would have been impeached or simply barred from running based on the Hollywood access tape alone, only for knowingly making advances on a married woman. No one is perfect.

Be careful in what you wish for, as to make sure it can't be used against you in a way that you didn't intend.

And that's before talking about the vagueness of being recognized "guilty" of morally dubious but lawful behavior... Who's gonna give the verdict? The court of public opinion? That's already the case, and the media is a terrible lawyer for you. A constitutional amendment that somehow restricts access to office for morally dubious but lawful behavior is a massive can of worms.

211 days ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

Certainly not. If morals were part of the constitution, then Trump would have been impeached or simply barred from running based on the Hollywood access tape alone, only for knowingly making advances on a married woman. No one is perfect.

Be careful in what you wish for, as to make sure it can't be used against you in a way that you didn't intend.

And that's before talking about the vagueness of being recognized "guilty" of morally dubious but lawful behavior... Who's gonna give the verdict? The court of public opinion? That's already the case, and the media is a terrible lawyer for you. A constitution amendment that somehow restricts access to office for morally dubious but lawful behavior is a massive can of worms.

211 days ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

Certainly not. If morals were part of the constitution, then Trump would have been impeached or simply barred from running based on the Hollywood access tape alone, only for knowingly making advances on a married woman. No one is perfect.

Be careful in what you wish for, as to make sure it can't be used against you in a way that you didn't intend.

And that's before talking about the vagueness of being recognized "guilty" of morally dubious but not unlawful behavior... Who's gonna give the verdict? The court of public opinion? That's already the case, and the media is a terrible lawyer for you.

211 days ago
2 score
Reason: Original

Certainly not. If morals were part of the constitution, then Trump would have been impeached or simply barred from running based on the Hollywood access tape alone, only for knowingly making advances on a married woman. No one is perfect.

Be careful in what you wish for, as to make sure it can't be used against you in a way that you didn't intend.

211 days ago
1 score