You agree the decision was concerning. And while Barrett didn’t write it the decision she supported did cite it and therefore rely on it.

Meaning she relied on a decision that you yourself admit is concerning to form her judgment on an issue.

And you can’t seem to wrap your head around the fact that her reliance on a concerning (your own words) precedent to inform her views on an important issue is actually concerning to some of us?

I’m beginning to think that you’re the shill. For ACB.

You agree the decision was concerning. And while Barrett didn’t write it she did heavily cite it.

Meaning she relied on a decision that you yourself admit is concerning to form her judgment on an issue.

And you can’t seem to wrap your head around the fact that her reliance on a concerning (your own words) precedent to inform her views on an important issue is actually concerning to some of us?

I’m beginning to think that you’re the shill. For ACB.