Well Forbes specifically excludes royalty and nobility from its richest people list, and most of those old European bloodlines with impossible amounts of money are nobles to some degree (hell even lawyers were considered noble-class before the civil war, and many still retain the title of nobility, "Esquire").

The money's all fake anyways, the only scarcity on the money supply is artificial, when Nixon dealt the final blow to the gold standard he handed the entire economy to bankers, bankers who decrease the money supply as a broad principle while increasing it for their allies. Everyone feels the pressure of constantly shrinking economic power per dollar, except for friends of bankers and the recipients of government grants.

Twitter operated at a loss for many years. Who floated their debts indefinitely while they gained a monopoly? Banks and bank friends. Youtube, same thing. It costs a tremendous amount of money to set up the bandwidth and servers needed to compete. Youtube always had that money available, since the day Google bought them.

Bankers rule the economy, NOT consumers, because consumers can be manipulated without consequence with enough funds. Youtube can run fewer ads than anyone for longer than anyone, as they already did, until no real competition exists. Websites need revenue but consumers avoid ads.

If you were given the ability to run your business at a limitless loss for any length of time, with enough investment capital to buy out any competition that threatens you, you could have an industrial monopoly in a matter of decades as well. It's not hard when you team up with a rigged bank monopoly.

Well Forbes specifically excludes royalty and nobility from its richest people list, and most of those old European bloodlines with impossible amounts of money are nobles to some degree (hell even lawyers were considered noble-class before the civil war, and many still retain the title of nobility, "Esquire").

The money's all fake anyways, the only scarcity on the money supply is artificial, when Nixon dealt the final blow to the gold standard he handed the entire economy to bankers, bankers who decrease the money supply as a broad principle while increasing it for their allies. Everyone feels the pressure of constantly shrinking economic power per dollar, except for friends of bankers and the recipients of government grants.

Twitter operated at a loss for many years. Who floated their debts indefinitely while they gained a monopoly? Banks and bank friends. Youtube, same thing. It costs a tremendous amount of money to set up the bandwidth and servers needed to compete. Youtube always had that money available, since the day Google bought them.

Bankers rule the economy, NOT consumers, because consumers can be manipulated without consequence with enough funds. Youtube can run fewer ads than anyone for longer than anyone, as they already did, until no real competition exists. Websites need revenue but consumers avoid ads.