First question I have is, I've heard that Li-Meng Yan didn't have the qualifications to make the claims she did. Is this true? I haven't verified that myself yet, but do you know one way or the other? I've been surprised that her claims haven't had more of an impact. As you probably know, there are about 160 different types of Coronavirus that have been identified. CV has been with us for well over 100 years, having been responsible for the plague of...1918, was it? The difference between this version of CV versus all others is the SARS/HIV component that was grafted into the virus...aka, the delivery device. I'm not a medical professional, but I did take chemical engineering in college, so I understand some of this. If they had to graft the delivery device into the disease, that tells me that there is a rather large herd immunity to just CV itself w/out the SARS/HIV component, so I'm wondering whether CV itself is all that important to this particular virus, that they could have picked any virus for the SARS/HIV component to attach itself to. I think it's the SARS/HIV component that makes it so volatile, but that's only if it can attach itself to the CV. Once this particular version of CV gets shut down through immunity, the SARS/HIV component can't get activated. I'm betting that this particular version of CV that they chose to graft to is because it's the only stable version that would accept the graft. I am also betting that they believed this particular version of CV would have a greater impact than it actually has.

First question I have is, I've heard that Li-Meng Yan didn't have the qualifications to make the claims she did. Is this true? I haven't verified that myself yet, but do you know one way or the other? I've been surprised that her claims haven't had more of an impact. As you probably know, there are about 160 different types of Coronavirus that have been identified. CV has been with us for well over 100 years, having been responsible for the plague of...1918, was it? The difference between this version of CV versus all others is the SARS/HIV component that was grafted into the virus...aka, the delivery device. I'm not a medical professional, but I did take chemical engineering in college, so I understand some of this. If they had to graft the delivery device into the disease, that tells me that there is a rather large herd immunity to just CV itself w/out the SARS/HIV component, so I'm wondering whether CV itself is all that important to this particular virus, that they could have picked any virus for the SARS/HIV component to attach itself to. I think it's the SARS/HIV component that makes it so volatile, but that's only if it can attach itself to the CV. Once this particular version of CV gets shut down through immunity, the SARS/HIV component can't get activated. I'm betting that this particular version of CV that they chose to graft to is because it's the only stable version that would accept the graft.

First question I have is, I've heard that Li-Meng Yan didn't have the qualifications to make the claims she did. Is this true? I haven't verified that myself yet, but do you know one way or the other? I've been surprised that her claims haven't had more of an impact. As you probably know, there are about 160 different types of Coronavirus that have been identified. CV has been with us for well over 100 years, having been responsible for the plague of...1918, was it? The difference between this version of CV versus all others is the SARS/HIV component that was grafted into the virus...aka, the delivery device. I'm not a medical professional, but I did take chemical engineering in college, so I understand some of this. If they had to graft the delivery device into the disease, that tells me that there is a rather large herd immunity to just CV itself w/out the SARS/HIV component, so I'm wondering whether CV itself is all that important to this particular virus, that they could have picked any virus for the SARS/HIV component to attach itself to. I think it's the SARS/HIV component that makes it so volatile, but that's only if it can attach itself to the CV. Once the CV gets shut down through immunity, the SARS/HIV component can't get activated. I'm betting that this particular version of CV that they chose to graft to is because it's the only stable version that would accept the graft.