Win / TheDonald
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: edit

She's going to recuse. Another fucking Sessions imo, sorry Pedes.

Watching and listening to her when she was pushed by a Dem senator to "commit" to recusing regarding decisions involving a "disputed election". Of course Dems claim Trump is pushing to get her confirmed so she'll vote for him in a Supreme Court decision (i.e the 'appearance'). She claimed she would take "very seriously" any "appearance of bias", ...didn't have to be any facts just the wishy washy "appearance" which Judges pretend to avoid like the plague. And on that basis implied that she would recuse. She also implied that she couldn't give a committment to recuse right there and then because of legal reasons which she had pointed to previously.

My two cents...she's going to be the classic professional bureaucrat and, where possible in controversial or side-taking issues, PASS THE BUCK (i.e recuse). She's going to fuck the country because of this and then feign innocence and decency about the 'integrity of the law'--blah, blah, blah.

Regarding "appearance of bias", no other Trump hating Judge has worried about this.

Also, surely "appearance of bias" goes with the job. EVERY losing side in a case usually complains that the Judge was 'biased'. So what?

Obviously getting ahead of things here; pray that she doesn't recuse...but Pedes better be ready for this MASSIVE disappointment when it comes to the crunch (as it will). AND BE PREPARED.

101 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

She's going to recuse. Another fucking Sessions imo, sorry Pedes.

Watching and listening to her when she was pushed by a Dem senator to "commit" to recusing regarding decisions involving a "disputed election". She claimed she would take "very seriously" any "appearance of bias", and on that basis implied that she would recuse. She also implied that she couldn't give a committment to recuse right there and then because of legal reasons which she had pointed to previously.

My two cents...she's going to be the classic professional bureaucrat and, where possible in controversial or side-taking issues, PASS THE BUCK (i.e recuse). She's going to fuck the country because of this and then feign innocence and decency about the 'integrity of the law'--blah, blah, blah.

Regarding "appearance of bias", no other Trump hating Judge has worried about this.

Also, surely "appearance of bias" goes with the job. EVERY losing side in a case usually complains that the Judge was 'biased'. So what?

Obviously getting ahead of things here; pray that she doesn't recuse...but Pedes better be ready for this MASSIVE disappointment when it comes to the crunch (as it will). AND BE PREPARED.

101 days ago
1 score