Occam's razor is based on how many assumptions you must make to choose one conclusion over another.

It would not be an assumption finding classified information on an individuals personal computer to be a crime. A crime must have been committed for classified info to reside on a persons personal computer.

Rudy's comments about images brings a lot of possible assumptions. Many more about the illegal activities possible with images than with classified docs on a personal computer.

I don't think we currently have enough information to make any judgements or conclusions on this until we can see what's in the docs/images.

Occam's razor is based on how many assumptions you must make to choose one conclusion over another.

It would not be a assumption finding classified information on an individuals personal computer to be a crime. A crime must have been committed for classified info to reside on a persons personal computer.

Rudy's comments about images brings a lot of possible assumptions. Many more about the illegal activities possible with images than with classified docs on a personal computer.

I don't think we currently have enough information to make any judgements or conclusions on this until we can see what's in the docs/images.

Occam's razor is based on how many assumptions you must make to choose one conclusion over another.

It would not be a assumption finding classified information on an individuals personal computer to be a crime. A crime must have been committed for classified info to reside on a persons personal computer.

Rudy's comments about images brings a lot of possible assumptions. Many more about the illegal activities possible with images than with classified docs on a personal computer.

I don't think we currently have enough information to make any judgements or conclusions on this until we can see what's in the docs/images.