THIS RIGHT HERE: her favoring putting male to female trans people in a women's shelter, if the locals, who know the scene, don't want to.

That rigidity. That absolutism.

This means that she has no wisdom about being a woman.

And it's the one thing she actually is, and should know better than anything else.

Of course it's discrimination. Sometimes discrimination is necessary to protect women. Women are not like other people. A woman is not a man with a hole.

She is a silly child in a woman's body.

Womanly sagacity is needed and it has been uprooted, because it involves loyalty to husband and child.

And because it is rooted in realism. Realism is an enemy to leftism. Because leftism isn't rooted in realism.

And womanly sagacity involves going for yourself and your family, not the state.

THIS RIGHT HERE: her favoring putting male to female trans people in a women's shelter, if the locals, who know the scene, don't want to.

That rigidity. That absolutism.

This means that she has no wisdom about being a woman.

And it's the one thing she actually is, and should know better than anything else.

Of course it's discrimination. Sometimes discrimination is necessary to protect women. Women are not like other people. A woman is not a man with a hole.

She is a silly child in a woman's body.

Womanly sagacity is needed and it has been uprooted, because it involves loyalty to husband and child.

And because it is rooted in realism. Realism is an enemy to leftism. Because leftism isn't rooted in realism.

And womanly sagacity involves going for yourself and your family. Not the state.

THIS RIGHT HERE. Her favoring putting male to female trans people in a women's shelter. If the locals, who know the scene because they work in it, don't want to. That rigidity. That absolutism.

She has no wisdom about being a woman. And it's the one thing she actually is, and should know better than anything else.

Of course it's discrimination. Sometimes discrimination is necessary to protect women. Women are not like other people. A woman is not a man with a hole.

She is a silly child in a woman's body.

THIS RIGHT HERE. Her favoring putting male to female trans people in a women's shelter. If the locals, who know the scene because they work in it, don't want to. That rigidity. That absolutism.

She has no wisdom about being a woman. And it's the one thing she actually is.

Consider. She isn't trans. She isn't non-white. She isn't homeless. She isn't in politics. But she IS a woman, and has walked around. THIS she ought to know about.

She has the naivete to think a mtf trans could never, ever be inconsistent, or have sexual feelings he used to have. Her absolutism about the vulnerability of shelter women is cold. It is exactly the social incomprehension and indifference she accuses YOU of.

Of course it's discrimination. Sometimes discrimination is necessary to protect women. Women are not like other people. A woman is not a man with a hole.

Her incomprehension of that is deeply unladylike, and deeply unfeminine, and counter to anything feminism ever might have had to offer, of female concern and female solidarity.

THAT is the deal breaker here. Not even politics.

She may not be bad. But her incomprehension level is too high. Way too high. She is not very intelligent and one needs intelligence, the visceral kind, not just the book learning kind which is mostly about passing tests, to be woman. A fully developed one.

She is a silly child in a woman's body.

I think you will know what to look for next time. It is a kind of realism. Solidity. Loyalty. In your home, YOU are president. And you will still be, when several more presidential elections have come and gone.

I hate to say this to someone hurting, but she may have engineered this because she knew how to get rid of you, and had other reasons, who knows what, could be anything, for thinking it was time to move on.

Both men and women do that. They start a fight on purpose. It can be vaguely semi-unconscious.

THIS RIGHT HERE. Her favoring putting male to female trans people in a women's shelter. If the locals, who know the scene because they work in it, don't want to. That rigidity. That absolutism.

She has no wisdom about being a woman.

If she is an absolutist about the thing she should know best, being a woman, she hasn't got the sense needed to be a nice person.

Consider. She isn't trans. She isn't non-white. She isn't homeless. She isn't in politics. But she IS a woman, and has walked around. THIS she ought to know about.

She has the naivete to think a mtf trans could never, ever be inconsistent, or have sexual feelings he used to have. Her absolutism about the vulnerability of shelter women is cold. It is exactly the social incomprehension and indifference she accuses YOU of.

Of course it's discrimination. Sometimes discrimination is necessary to protect women. Women are not like other people. A woman is not a man with a hole.

Her incomprehension of that is deeply unladylike, and deeply unfeminine, and counter to anything feminism ever might have had to offer, of female concern and female solidarity.

THAT is the deal breaker here. Not even politics.

She may not be bad. But her incomprehension level is too high. Way too high. She is not very intelligent and one needs intelligence, the visceral kind, not just the book learning kind which is mostly about passing tests, to be woman. A fully developed one.

She is a silly child in a woman's body.

I think you will know what to look for next time. It is a kind of realism. Solidity. Loyalty. In your home, YOU are president. And you will still be, when several more presidential elections have come and gone.

I hate to say this to someone hurting, but she may have engineered this because she knew how to get rid of you, and had other reasons, who knows what, could be anything, for thinking it was time to move on.

Both men and women do that. They start a fight on purpose. It can be vaguely semi-unconscious.

THIS RIGHT HERE. She has no wisdom about being a woman. If she is an absolutist about the thing she should know best, being a woman, she hasn't got the sense needed to be a nice person.

She isn't trans. She isn't non-white. She isn't homeless. She isn't in politics. But she IS a woman, and has walked around. She has the naievete to think a mtf trans can never, ever be inconsistent, or have feelings he used to have. Her absolutism about the vulnerability of women without her social strengths is cold. It is exactly the social incomprehension and indifference she accuses YOU of.

Of course it's discrimination. Sometimes discrimination is necessary to protect women. Women are not like other people. A woman is not a man with a hole.

Her incomprehension of that is deeply unladylike and deeply unfeminine and counter to anything feminism ever might have had to offer of female concern and female solidarity.

THAT is the deal breaker. Not even politics.

She may not be bad. But her incomprehension level is too high. Way too high. She is not very intelligent and you need intelligence, the visceral kind, not just the book learning kind which is mostly about passing tests, to be woman.

She is a silly child in a woman's body.

I think you will know what to look for next time. It is a kind of realism.