Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES Front All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Koch spent $1.3 billion upgrading an ammonia plant to make urea for DEF. They burn up a ridiculous amount of natural gas, create lots of waste water and release tons of carbon dioxide in the process. (It's possible the excess CO2 from converting natural gas to ammonia may be consumed converting ammonia to urea.)

All for a system that wastes diesel fuel and destroys engines.

How is that good for the environment?

126 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Koch spent $1.3 billion upgrading an ammonia plant to make urea for DEF. They burn up a ridiculous amount of natural gas, create lots of waste water and release tons of carbon dioxide in the process. (It's possible that the excess CO2 from converting natural gas to ammonia may be consumed converting ammonia to urea.)

All for a system that wastes diesel fuel and destroys engines.

How is that good for the environment?

126 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Koch spent $1.3 billion upgrading an ammonia plant to make urea for DEF. They burn up a ridiculous amount of natural gas, create lots of waste water and release tons of carbon dioxide in the process.(It's possible that the excess CO2 from converting natural gas to ammonia may be consumed converting ammonia to urea.)

All for a system that wastes diesel fuel and destroys engines.

How is that good for the environment?

126 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Koch spent $1.3 billion upgrading an ammonia plant to make urea for DEF. They burn up a ridiculous amount of natural gas, create lots of waste water and release tons of carbon dioxide in the process.

All for a system that wastes diesel fuel and destroys engines.

How is that good for the environment?

126 days ago
1 score