He's an attorney investigating a case which he has disclosed publicly and to various authorities. He did not produce the materials, and he will not sell the materials. How do people think this works? What like evidence of a crime is collected but because it is CP, the legally authorized collector is also prosecuted, as is the next authorized individual who receives it, and the next, and the next, and lastly the one who deletes it is also prosecuted for having 'possessed' it briefly in order to delete it? Is that how people think it works? Also, the metadata on images and videos almost always includes the date when something was recorded as well as GPS coordinates and other such info. If these images and/or videos were made in the normal fashion, all of that info will be there and it will incriminate Hunter who was at those locations on those days rather than Giuliani who was not.

He's an attorney investigating a case which he has disclosed publicly and to various authorities. He did not produce the materials, and he will not sell the materials. How do people think this works? What like evidence of a crime is collected but because it is CP, the legally authorized collector is also prosecuted, as is the next authorized individual who receives it, and the next, and the next, and lastly the one who deletes it is also prosecuted for having 'possessed' it briefly in order to delete it? Is that how people think it works?