P. 63:24-25. Maxwell testifies that "Again, Jeffrey hired [the] people" she met.
So she advised them of opportunities to work for Epstein, where Maxwell knew they would be required to perform sexual acts.
Then combative evasiveness around:
p. 69 Attorney asks "I was trying to interpret whether you didn't understand what a school girl outfit was" and Maxwell says "I clearly know what a school girl outfit is." Then: P70:22-25 Maxwell gets evasive on the definition of a "sex toy" saying she doesn't "recollect anything about a laundry basket." Bullshit. If you know what a school girl outfit is then you know what a sex toy is.
Also revealing wording. I'd expect an innocent person to say they "don't recall a laundry basket of sex toys." She doesn't answer about what she saw. She answers about what she's been told say / coached on. She says she doesn't "recollect anything about" basically saying she doesn't remember how she was supposed to answer this question. She she can't remember the party line, she can't deny it. Accidentally thinks this part out loud.
P. 63:24-25. Maxwell testifies that "Again, Jeffrey hired [the] people" she met.
So she advised them of opportunities to work for Epstein, where Maxwell knew they would be required to perform sexual acts.
Then combative evasiveness around:
p. 69 Attorney asks "I was trying to interpret whether you didn't understand what a school girl outfit was" and Maxwell says "I clearly know what a school girl outfit is." Then: P70:22-25 Maxwell gets evasive on the definition of a "sex toy" saying she doesn't "recollect anything about a laundry basket." Odd phrasing. I'd expect an innocent person to say they "don't recall a laundry basket of sex toys." She's not answers about what she saw, but answering about what she's been told say / coached on. She's basically saying she doesn't remember how she was supposed to answer this question.
P. 63:24-25. Maxwell testifies that "Again, Jeffrey hired [the] people" she met.
Then combative evasiveness around:
p. 69 Attorney asks "I was trying to interpret whether you didn't understand what a school girl outfit was" and Maxwell says "I clearly know what a school girl outfit is." Then: P70:22-25 Maxwell gets evasive on the definition of a "sex toy" saying she doesn't "recollect anything about a laundry basket." Odd phrasing. I'd expect an innocent person to say they "don't recall a laundry basket of sex toys." The question was not whether she had heard of a basket or been told of one, but whether she had one. She instead answers about conversations, seemingly responding that she hadn't been coached on this precise subject. Since she couldn't recall "anything about" it she couldn't deny it...
P. 63:24-25. Maxwell testifies that "Again, Jeffrey hired [the] people" she met.
Then combative evasiveness around:
p. 69 Attorney asks "I was trying to interpret whether you didn't understand what a school girl outfit was" and Maxwell says "I clearly know what a school girl outfit is." Then: P70:22-25 Maxwell gets evasive on the definition of a "sex toy" saying she doesn't "recollect anything about a laundry basket." Odd phrasing. I'd expect an innocent person to say they "don't recall a laundry basket of sex toys." She's not answers about what she saw, but answering about what she's been told say / coached on. She's basically saying she doesn't remember how she was supposed to answer this question.
P. 63:24-25. Maxwell testifies that "Again, Jeffrey hired [the] people" she met.