In my view this is just three red lines. We don't know the intended meaning and it could be anything. It's likely used all over the place. There's probably an insect with three red lines on its back to indicate it's poisonous. Except it's not, but it's evolved to have it because another insect has three red lines but is poisonous so it keeps the predators and other buggers away. If B had three circles instead then it would be four lines, perhaps.
The huge however is that the left want to go and make out how everything's a hate sign, everything's a Swastika, and resemblance isn't coincidental and so on so as far as I'm concerned knock yourself out, break a leg, go ahead, let rip.
Also even without this symbology we know it's basically true anyway they want to usher in some kind of unusually twisted socialist like regime. They'll just say it when asked one way or another.
The way the Democrats work is like this: "Are you stepping on my toe?" - Someone "No, you're putting your toe under my foot." - Democrat
That or something even more deranged like "No, I have my foot perched on a mostly solid mass comprised of bone and other material." or "What makes you think that toe belongs to you?"
They'll have a tendency to say I'm not doing word but I'm doing the definition of that word. For example, we're not doing socialist but we're taxing everyone and then redistributing it according to some principle which is basically the same as socialism.
In my view this is just three red lines. We don't know the intended meaning and it could be anything. It's likely used all over the place. There's probably an insect with three red lines on its back to indicate it's poisonous. Except it's not, but it's evolved to have it because another insect has three red lines but is poisonous so it keeps the predators and other buggers away. If B had three circles instead then it would be four lines, perhaps.
The huge however is that the left want to go and make out how everything's a hate sign, everything's a Swastika, and resemblance isn't coincidental and so on so as far as I'm concerned knock yourself out, break a leg, go ahead, let rip.
Also even without this symbology we know it's basically true anyway they want to usher in some kind of unusually twisted socialist like regime. They'll just say it when asked one way or another.
The way the Democrats work is like this: "Are you stepping on my toe?" - Someone "No, you're putting your toe under my foot." - Democrat
That or something even more deranged like "No, I have my foot perched on a mostly solid mass comprised of bone and other material." or "What makes you think that toe belongs to you?"
They'll have a tendency to say I'm not doing word but I'm doing the definition of that word.
In my view this is just three red lines. We don't know the intended meaning and it could be anything. It's likely used all over the place. There's probably an insect with three red lines on its back to indicate it's poisonous. Except it's not, but it's evolved to have it because another insect has three red lines but is poisonous so it keeps the predators and other buggers away. If B had three circles instead then it would be four lines, perhaps.
The huge however is that the left want to go and make out how everything's a hate sign, everything's a Swastika, and resemblance isn't coincidental and so on so as far as I'm concerned knock yourself out, break a leg, go ahead, let rip.
Also even without this symbology we know it's basically true anyway they want to usher in some kind of unusually twisted socialist like regime. They'll just say it when asked one way or another.
The way the Democrats work is like this: "Are you stepping on my toe?" - Someone "No, you're putting your toe under my foot." - Democrat
That or something even more deranged like "No, I have my foot perched on a mostly solid mass comprised of bone and other material." or "What makes you think that toe belongs to you?"
In my view this is just three red lines. We don't know the intended meaning and it could be anything. It's likely used all over the place. There's probably an insect with three red lines on its back to indicate it's poisonous. Except it's not, but it's evolved to have it because another insect has three red lines but is poisonous so it keeps the predators and other buggers away. If B had three circles instead then it would be four lines, perhaps.
The huge however is that the left want to go and make out how everything's a hate sign, everything's a Swastika, and resemblance isn't coincidental and so on so as far as I'm concerned knock yourself out, break a leg, go ahead, let rip.
Also even without this symbology we know it's basically true anyway they want to usher in some kind of unusually twisted socialist like regime. They'll just say it when asked one way or another.
In my view this is just three red lines. We don't know the intended meaning and it could be anything. It's likely used all over the place. There's probably an insect with three red lines on its back to indicate it's poisonous. Except it's not, but it's evolved to have it because another insect has three red lines but is poisonous so it keeps the predators and other buggers away. If B had three circles instead then it would be four lines, perhaps.
The huge however is that the left want to go and make out how everything's a hate sign, everything's a Swastika, and resemblance isn't coincidental and so on so as far as I'm concerned knock yourself out, break a leg, go ahead, let rip.