Yeah, sorry but snowflaketear's post doesn't make sense. The democrat-run areas will be protected by... what exactly? Masks that do next to nothing? Lockdowns? Conservatives would stay at home/take precautions if there was a true mass-killing plague instead of a .1% plague as well, so there's no advantage there. Plus, democrats are much higher represented in high population density areas which would likely spread a bio-weapon disease much faster.

Maybe such a weapon could be used to create chaos and attempt to take power, but it wouldn't be able to target conservatives while sparing liberal/Democrat areas.

But being prepared for crazy things to happen in the current political environment is not a bad idea in any case.

Yeah, sorry but snowflaketear's post doesn't make sense. The democrat-run areas will be protected by... what exactly? Masks that do next to nothing? Lockdowns? Conservatives would stay at home/take precautions if there was a true mass-killing plague instead of a .1% plague as well, so there's no advantage there. Plus, democrats are much higher represented in high population density areas which would likely spread a bio-weapon disease much faster.

Maybe such a weapon could be used to create chaos, but it wouldn't be able to target conservatives while sparing liberal/Democrat areas.

But being prepared for crazy things to happen in the current political environment is not a bad idea in any case.

Yeah, sorry but snowflaketear's post doesn't make sense. The democrat-run areas will be protected by... what exactly? Masks that do next to nothing? Lockdowns? Conservatives would stay at home/take precautions if there was a true mass-killing plague instead of a .1% plague as well, so there's no advantage there. Plus, democrats are much higher represented in high population density areas which would likely spread a bio-weapon disease much faster.

Maybe such a weapon could be used to create chaos, but it wouldn't be able to target conservatives while sparing liberal/Democrat areas.