This.

Does "appointed" mean "selected as a POTENTIAL Elector" (e.g. Hillary Clinton was selected recently to be a potential Elector) or does it mean "FINAL"? Is there case law to clarify this? I see on the National Archives website (archived it lol) it states:

The winning Presidential candidate's slate of potential electors are appointed as the State's electors

Source: https://www.archives.gov/electoral-college/electors

Archived Source: https://archive.is/XibmQ

"Winning" would logically mean that "appointed" refers to the "FINAL" Electors based on Election Day totals, NOT the "POTENTIAL".

This.

Does "appointed" mean "selected as a POTENTIAL Elector" (e.g. Hillary Clinton was selected recently to be a potential final Elector) or does it mean "FINAL"? Is there case law to clarify this? I see on the National Archives website (archived it lol) it states:

The winning Presidential candidate's slate of potential electors are appointed as the State's electors

Source: https://www.archives.gov/electoral-college/electors

Archived Source: https://archive.is/XibmQ

"Winning" would logically mean that "appointed" refers to the "FINAL" Electors based on Election Day totals, NOT the "POTENTIAL".

This.

Does "appointed" mean "selected as the POTENTIAL FINAL Electors" (e.g. Hillary Clinton was selected recently to be a potential final Elector) or does it mean "FINAL"? Is there case law to clarify this? I see on the National Archives website (archived it lol) it states:

The winning Presidential candidate's slate of potential electors are appointed as the State's electors

Source: https://www.archives.gov/electoral-college/electors

Archived Source: https://archive.is/XibmQ

"Winning" would logically mean that "appointed" refers to the "FINAL" Electors based on Election Day totals, NOT the "POTENTIAL FINAL".