The litigation is in the courts of the states with the suspicious and documented-proven evidence. This is a massive effort which will require a large distributed legal team. I know it's confusing, especially in Pennsylvania -- there is the highest court in the land over all 50 states SCOTUS Supreme Court of the US, also PASC the PA State level supreme court. Also involved is PAGOV Governor Wolf, and PALEG the PA State Legislature which has a Republican majority right now. One more! I will say PALAW which is the guiding PA State law on the books at the time of the election.

Okay, here's how it went down in Pennsylvania far as I know. Democratic operatives wanted to ease up the restrictions that are in place under PALAW so they could break rules of when ballots arrive and the procedures for verification. PALAW also states that PALEG has authority to regulate election practices. They knew they would not get approval from PALEG so PAGOV had PASC issue a memo to change the counting rules "because COVID". This bypassed the Legislature completely. THEN election day comes and goes and no one wants to stop the count and they are taking extraordinary and fallacious steps to keep going until they can eat away Trump's lead. Tactics such as counting ballots arrived after election day, permitting spoiled ballots, actually going out door-to-door with spoiled ballots getting the voter to correct them, etc. 'Services' that are not being offered in places where Trump has clear support.

So PALEG is finally standing up to this, and SCOTUS/Alito (under the US Supreme Court's designated power to oversee Federal elections) issued a memo to Pennsylvania saying "You must segregate into two piles before 8pm Nov 3 and after, in case there is an audit." It will hopefully be decided that PAGOV+PASC was acting outside the law. It is also likely that there will be an audit/recount to re-tally the results based on strict Pennsylvania law. There is precedent that SCOTUS can step in and ensure that a State's election was conducted according to its own State Law at the time of the election. States cannot even sleaze out of this by changing their laws after an election. Hope this helps.

The litigation is in the courts of the states with the suspicious and documented-proven evidence. This is a massive effort which will require a large distributed legal team. I know it's confusing, especially in Pennsylvania -- there is the highest court in the land over all 50 states SCOTUS Supreme Court of the US, also PASC the PA State level supreme court. Also involved is PAGOV Governor Wolf, and PALEG the PA State Legislature which has a Republican majority right now. One more! I will say PALAW which is the guiding PA State law on the books at the time of the election.

Okay, here's how it went down in Pennsylvania far as I know. Democratic operatives wanted to ease up the restrictions that are in place under PALAW so they could break rules of when ballots arrive and the procedures for verification. PALAW also states that PALEG has authority to regulate election practices. They knew they would not get approval from PALEG so PAGOV had PASC issue a memo to change the counting rules "because COVID". This bypassed the Legislature completely. THEN election day comes and goes and no one wants to stop the count and they are taking extraordinary and fallacious steps to keep going until they can eat away Trump's lead. Tactics such as counting ballots arrived after election day, permitting spoiled ballots, actually going out door-to-door with spoiled ballots getting the voter to correct them, etc. 'Services' that are not being offered in places where Trump has clear support.

So PALEG is finally standing up to this, and SCOTUS/Alito (under the US Supreme Court's designated power oversee to Federal elections) issued a memo to Pennsylvania saying "You must segregate into two piles before 8pm Nov 3 and after, in case there is an audit." It will hopefully be decided that PAGOV+PASC was acting outside the law. It is also likely that there will be an audit/recount to re-tally the results based on strict Pennsylvania law. There is precedent that SCOTUS can step in and ensure that a State's election was conducted according to its own State Law at the time of the election. States cannot even sleaze out of this by changing their laws after an election. Hope this helps.

The litigation is in the courts of the states with the suspicious and documented-proven evidence. This is a massive effort which will require a large distributed legal team. I know it's confusing, especially in Pennsylvania -- there is the highest court in the land over all 50 states SCOTUS Supreme Court of the US, also PASC the PA State level supreme court. Also involved is PAGOV Governor Wolf, and PALEG the PA State Legislature which has a Republican majority right now. One more! I will say PALAW which is the guiding PA State law on the books at the time of the election.

Okay, here's how it went down in Pennsylvania far as I know. Democratic operatives wanted to ease up the restrictions that are in place under PALAW so they could break rules of when ballots arrive and the procedures for verification. PALAW also states that PALEG has authority to regulate election practices. They knew they would not get approval from PALEG so PAGOV had PASC issue a memo to change the counting rules "because COVID". This bypassed the Legislature completely. THEN election day comes and goes and no one wants to stop the count and they are taking extraordinary and fallacious steps to keep going until they can eat away Trump's lead. Tactics such as counting ballots arrived after election day, permitting spoiled ballots, actually going out door-to-door with spoiled ballots getting the voter to correct them, etc. 'Services' that are not being offered in places where Trump has clear support.

So PALEG is finally standing up to this, and SCOTUS/Alito (under the US Supreme Court's designated power oversee Federal elections) issued a memo the Pennsylvania saying "You must segregate into two piles before 8pm Nov 3 and after, in case there is an audit." It will hopefully be decided that PAGOV+PASC was acting outside the law. It is also likely that there will be an audit/recount to re-tally the results based on strict Pennsylvania law. There is precedent that SCOTUS can step in and ensure that a State's election was conducted according to its own State Law at the time of the election. States cannot even sleaze out of this by changing their laws after an election. Hope this helps.