My official appellate attorney analysis. The respondent has bullshit responses.

Edit: I was angry texting in my car at a stoplight. Fink was speaking. Everyone for the city, the clerk, and the Dem party are giving absolutely no legal basis for why an injunction is improper. It was hard to understand the rep from the clerk’s office. She’s citing statutes but to what end?

My official appellate attorney analysis. The respondent has bullshit responses.