Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES Front All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

It definitely can be. The 4-4 I was referencing was their decision not to accept the appeal back in october when trump team asked them to decide if the PA supreme court violated the federal constitution by infringing on their state legislature's right to set election law. The state legislature basically made a law for the criteria to accept an absentee ballot and the state supreme court changed it because of COVID. They can't do that and the law is unseverable meaning if one provision is invalidated the entire statute is invalidated, which I interpret to mean NO MAIL IN BALLOTS.

Now they surely have to accept the case to make a decision. Something insane would have to happen for them not to strike down the PA supreme court's ruling that changed the law for acceptance of ballots after 8pm on November 3 and extending it to november 6.

The most important question is always this: what is the remedy? How can they throw out those ballots that came in late if the crooks threw out the envelopes with the time stamps? And what about the evidence of back dating? This has been the question eating at me all week.

Do they order a revote? Throw out all absentee ballots? Sent it to the PA legislature to vote on who should get the electors? I don't know. It's crazy.

101 days ago
1 score
Reason: Clarified the PA ruling

It definitely can be. The 4-4 I was referencing their decision not to accept the appeal back in october when trump team asked them to decide if the PA supreme court violated the federal constitution by infringing on their state legislature's right to set election law. The state legislature basically made a law for the criteria to accept an absentee ballot and the state supreme court changed it because of COVID. They can't do that and the law is unseverable meaning if one provision is invalidated the entire statute is invalidated, which u interpret to mean NO MAIL IN BALLOTS.

Now they surely have to accept the case to make a decision. Something insane would have to happen for them not to strike down the PA supreme court's ruling that changed the law for acceptance of ballots after 8pm on November 3 and extending it to november 6.

The most important question is always this: what is the remedy? How can they throw out those ballots that came in late if the crooks threw out the envelopes with the time stamps? And what about the evidence of back dating? This has been the question eating at me all week.

Do they order a revote? Throw out all absentee ballots? Sent it to the PA legislature to vote on who should get the electors? I don't know. It's crazy.

101 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

It definitely can be the 4-4 I was referencing their decision not to accept the appeal back in october when trump team asked them to decide if the PA supreme court violated the federal constitution by infringing on their state legislature's right to set election law. Now they surely have to accept the case to make a decision. Something insane would have to happen for them not to strike down the PA supreme court's ruling that changed the law for acceptance of ballots after 8pm on November 3 and extending it to november 6.

The most important question is always this: what is the remedy? How can they throw out those ballots that came in late if the crooks threw out the envelopes with the time stamps? And what about the evidence of back dating? This has been the question eating at me all week.

Do they order a revote? Throw out all absentee ballots? Sent it to the PA legislature to vote on who should get the electors? I don't know. It's crazy.

101 days ago
1 score