You: ...all they do is shape public opinion, and in the direction of ending the US as a sovereign Nation. This is not Constitutionally protected activity. Instead the Constitution condemns it outright. SEE: sedition.

Also you: I never described the press as "bad people," that's your strawman.

Yeah, sedition isn't something bad people do. Either that, or you don't actually know what the term "strawman argument" means or how to use it. It's one or the other; you can't have it both ways. (People who use fancy terms that they don't know the meaning of often do it in the mistaken belief that it makes them appear more intelligent to those whom they consider less so. Is that due to ego? :)

Then there's this...

You: The press is a corporation.

Also you: I would never think anyone would conflate that with a corporation.

LOL I'm not off the subject. You are entirely off...your rocker.

I'm done here.

You: ...all they do is shape public opinion, and in the direction of ending the US as a sovereign Nation. This is not Constitutionally protected activity. Instead the Constitution condemns it outright. SEE: sedition.

Also you: I never described the press as "bad people," that's your strawman.

Yeah, sedition isn't something bad people do. Either that, or you don't actually know what the term "strawman argument" means or how to use it; you just like to use it anyway. It's one or the other; you can't have it both ways. (People who use fancy terms that they don't know the meaning of often do it in the mistaken belief that it makes them appear more intelligent to those whom they consider less so. Is that due to ego? :)

Then there's this...

You: The press is a corporation.

Also you: I would never think anyone would conflate that with a corporation.

LOL I'm not off the subject. You are entirely off...your rocker.

I'm done here.

You: ...all they do is shape public opinion, and in the direction of ending the US as a sovereign Nation. This is not Constitutionally protected activity. Instead the Constitution condemns it outright. SEE: sedition.

Also you: I never described the press as "bad people," that's your strawman.

OK. Therefore you believe those who commit sedition are not bad people. And nobody better claim you said they are, or they're using a strawman—simply because you didn't use the exact phrase "bad people" to describe them; you only called them "seditious." That demonstrates you don't actually know what the term "strawman argument" means or how to use it. You just like to use it anyway, perhaps in the belief it makes you appear more intelligent to those whom you consider less so. Is that due to ego?

Then there's this...

You: The press is a corporation.

Also you: I would never think anyone would conflate that with a corporation.

LOL I'm not off the subject. You are entirely off...your rocker.

I'm done here.

You: ...all they do is shape public opinion, and in the direction of ending the US as a sovereign Nation. This is not Constitutionally protected activity. Instead the Constitution condemns it outright. SEE: sedition.

Also you: I never described the press as "bad people," that's your strawman.

OK. Therefore you believe those who commit sedition are not bad people. And nobody better claim you said they are, or they're using a strawman—simply because you didn't use the exact phrase "bad people" to describe them; you only called them "seditious." That demonstrates you don't actually know what the term "strawman argument" means or how to use it. You just like to use it anyway, in the belief it makes you appear more intelligent to those whom you consider less so. Is that due to ego?

Then there's this...

You: The press is a corporation.

Also you: I would never think anyone would conflate that with a corporation.

LOL I'm not off the subject. You are entirely off...your rocker.

I'm done here.

You: ...all they do is shape public opinion, and in the direction of ending the US as a sovereign Nation. This is not Constitutionally protected activity. Instead the Constitution condemns it outright. SEE: sedition.

Also you: I never described the press as "bad people," that's your strawman.

OK. Therefore you believe those who commit sedition are not bad people. And nobody better claim you said they are, or they're using a strawman—simply because you didn't use the exact phrase "bad people" to describe them; you only called them "seditious." That demonstrates you don't actually know what the term "strawman argument" means or how to use it. You just like to use it anyway, in the belief it makes you appear more intelligent to those whom you consider less so. Is that due to ego?

Then there's this...

You: The press is a corporation.

Also you: I would never think anyone would conflate that with a corporation.

I'm not off the subject. You are entirely off...your rocker.

I'm done here.

You: ...all they do is shape public opinion, and in the direction of ending the US as a sovereign Nation. This is not Constitutionally protected activity. Instead the Constitution condemns it outright. SEE: sedition.

Also you: I never described the press as "bad people," that's your strawman.

OK. You believe those who commit sedition are not bad people, and nobody better claim you said they are, since you didn't use the exact phrase "bad people" to describe them. You only called them seditious. Hoke-kayyy. Got it.

Then there's this...

You: The press is a corporation.

Also you: I would never think anyone would conflate that with a corporation.

I'm not off the subject. You are entirely off...your rocker.

I'm done here.