One of my other comments here I put the link which I explain the diffferences in methods between "Strict-Constitutional <1% of cases" vs "Case Law & Rights violations 99+% of cases". The case law is basically irrelevant using the above (by design, not just by me, but by the Founders and the Constitution). That's why in that link, you'll see I give the (judges) NO wiggle room, zero not one inch. And if the opposition doesn't get one inch either. Which is why it produces wins 100% of the time.
The whole point of the above Electors are legally and timewise far different than "elections" and election fraud, and ballot issues. These are really two separate things in parallel. AND, as far as Electors goes, is a "facial challenge to 3 USC 2":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facial_challenge
- if 3 USC 2 is unconstitutional, then all Electors indeed had to be appointed by midnight on Election Day. (over 270+ Electors are thus DJT/Pence Republican).
or
- If 3 USC 2 is "legal/constitutional", then since all the States held Elections, then all the States' Legislatures can be late in appointing their Electors. But in being late, the State Legislatures still have FULL constitutional power over this, thus all those Republican States' Legislatures can just go ahead today, and appoint their SLATE of DJT/Pence-Republican Electors (which is the majority 270+ anyhow). As the Founders wisdom shows, the net result is about the same; one is cleaner from a Constitutional point of view.
vetoed by a Dem gov(ernor)
Governors play NO legal role in their State's Legislature's appointing Electors. It is NOT a "Bill or Law", its ONLY the legislative branch of the State which does this. (The Founders did this for all kinds of good reasons, from political(too much power) to practical (like what if the governor isn't there, ie vacancy).)
demand bulletproof voter ID and voting process
As to the voting process cleanup, yes that's what most of the 2nd part in POST covers; and these can be done as part of any new elections for the downballot contests which need it.
As to the voterID, don't hate me, I'm just a Yoda Redpill Dispenser, and I've worked polls and all kind of other things firsthand (incl the Census and many other things). But if you want some of the rarest redpills on this, to understand not only it doesn't/wont/cant do what it's desired for; but then causes more problems, read link below:
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O1nzRl/x/c/1ATp18yUfA
PS All those "loopholes" used, have been created by the court, I briefly cover this in that link I mention at the top in one of my other comments, explaining the differences in methods. It's the Marbury v Madison game of moving the goalposts. The solution is to have more Strict-Constitutionalists on the Supreme Court, Strike down the ASHWANDER RULES, and clean out the marxism.
One of my other comments here I put the link which I explain the diffferences in methods between "Strict-Constitutional <1% of cases" vs "Case Law & Rights violations 99+% of cases". The case law is basically irrelevant using the above (by design, not just by me, but by the Founders and the Constitution). That's why in that link, you'll see I give the (judges) NO wiggle room, zero not one inch. And if the opposition doesn't get one inch either. Which is why it produces wins 100% of the time.
The whole point of the above Electors are legally and timewise far different than "elections" and election fraud, and ballot issues. These are really two separate things in parallel. AND, as far as Electors goes, is a "facial challenge to 3 USC 2":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facial_challenge
- if 3 USC 2 is unconstitutional, then all Electors indeed had to be appointed by midnight on Election Day. (over 270+ Electors are thus DJT/Pence Republican).
or
- If 3 USC 2 is "legal/constitutional", then since all the States held Elections, then all the States' Legislatures can be late in appointing their Electors. But in being late, the State Legislatures still have FULL constitutional power over this, thus all those Republican States' Legislatures can just go ahead today, and appoint their SLATE of DJT/Pence-Republican Electors (which is the majority 270+ anyhow). As the Founders wisdom shows, the net result is about the same; one is cleaner from a Constitutional point of view.
vetoed by a Dem gov(ernor)
Governors play NO legal role in their State's Legislature's appointing Electors. It is NOT a "Bill or Law", its ONLY the legislative branch of the State which does this. (The Founders did this for all kinds of good reasons, from political(too much power) to practical (like what if the governor isn't there, ie vacancy).)
demand bulletproof voter ID and voting process
As to the voting process cleanup, yes that's what most of the 2nd part in POST covers; and these can be done as part of any new elections for the downballot contests which need it.
As to the voterID, don't hate me, I'm just a Yoda Redpill Dispenser, and I've worked polls and all kind of other things firsthand (incl the Census and many other things). But if you want some of the rarest redpills on this, to understand not only it doesn't/wont/cant do what it's desired for; but then causes more problems, read link below: