Well, if you say things that can be construed as ignorant & then refuse reason, what else is one to assume?
Facts don't care about your feelings... "The startling results are depicted in the attached Figure. As you can see, nonviolent campaigns have a 53% success rate and only about a 20% rate of complete failure. Things are reversed for violent campaigns, which were only successful 23% of the time, and complete failures about 60% of the time. Violent campaigns succeeded partially in about 10% of cases, again comparing unfavorably to nonviolent campaigns, which resulted in partial successes over 20% of the time."
Those who are ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it. You're playing right into their hands - its been their playbook for the last century...
PS I must have missed where the founding fathers assassinated the king before dumping tea in the harbor & writing petitions to the king during my studies of history...
Well, if you say things that can be construed as ignorant & then refuse reason, what else is one to assume?
Facts don't care about your feelings... "The startling results are depicted in the attached Figure. As you can see, nonviolent campaigns have a 53% success rate and only about a 20% rate of complete failure. Things are reversed for violent campaigns, which were only successful 23% of the time, and complete failures about 60% of the time. Violent campaigns succeeded partially in about 10% of cases, again comparing unfavorably to nonviolent campaigns, which resulted in partial successes over 20% of the time."
Those who are ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it. You're playing right into their hands - its been their playbook for the last century...
PS I must have missed where the founding fathers assassinated the king before dumping tea in the harbor & writing petitions to the king during my stufies of history...