Again, this is anti male bullshit. "All men are rapists", is what your argument amounts to unless you can prove that trannies are extremely more rapey than regular men. It makes it seem like men are ravenous beasts, barely kept in check by the slimmest of policies and all it would take is some relaxing of bathroom policies and rape breaks out across the land. The vast majority of stores have nobody monitoring the bathrooms at all. Nobody has ever double checked your gender before going in. All this moral posturing has no meaning, nothing even changed, they could always get away with using the bathroom of their choice if they were convincing enough to not raise any questions.

It does matter if there is very very little or no danger, because in the absence of any actual reason, you become just like a leftist arguing legal policy with your feelings. One of the downsides of liberty is that sometimes weird people do weird things with their freedom. Nobody really wins here, i dont particularly love the the idea of a muscle jock looking tanny in the womens bathroom and someone in a miniskirt and crop top in the mens bathroom. I would imagine that would fuck with a little boy or girls head worse than anything, but you prefer that scenario because we need to keep the penises away from the girls because all people with penises are dangerous.

Again, this is anti male bullshit. "All men are rapists", is what your argument amounts to unless you can prove that trannies are extremely more rapey than regular men. It makes it seem like men are ravenous beasts, barely kept in check by the slimmest of policies and all it would take is some relaxing of bathroom policies and rape breaks out across the land. The vast majority of stores have nobody monitoring the bathrooms at all. Nobody has ever double checked your gender before going in. All this moral posturing has no meaning, nothing even changed, they could always get away with using the bathroom of their choice if they were convincing enough to not raise any questions.