First, there isn't a "this" case. There exists a plethora of case(s). That is deliberate and intended to weight SCOTUS justices and State legislatures to the objective of securing justice for the greatest number of the affected.

Second, what "... very simple question" do you believe she should be answering? And, in your call for her to satiate your impatience can you assure the other 70M +/- Trump voters that she, in exposing her case prep, will not tip her hand, thereby allowing Respondent's counsel(s) to craft a strategy to damage or completely undermine the layers of her case?

Third, a smart lawyer will always taylor the message (market the issue) to the intended audience, which in the these matters happens to be Trump supporters. Hence the use of biblical verse, meme, and action oriented catch phrases. The Law is not only a chess game it is a theatrical performance and the better lawyer ALWAYS wins.

Will each be adjudicated before the electoral college deadline? Certainly not. The end game is to prevent the States from certifying the vote thereby thrusting the election into the House, where the GOP has a clear advantage in the one state/ one vote constitutional process. That gets DJT back at the helm where DOJ and the plethora of Civil cases can be allowed to wind through the Courts without the crippling weight of highly condensed time frames. Remember, POTUS' 2018 Executive Order allowing asset seizure(s) of bad actors who interfere in our elections is also a long range goal of the current actions. That adjudication wIll be a lengthy process. In order for that to happen DJT needs to be the helm. Jim Crow Joe certainly isn't going to bankrupt Soros and his partners in crime.

Hope that helps to answer your question.

First, there isn't a "this" case. There exists a plethora of case(s). That is deliberate and intended to weight SCOTUS justices and State legislatures to the objective of securing justice for the greatest number of the affected.

Second, what "... very simple question" do you believe she should be answering? And, in your call for her to satiate your impatience can you assure the other 70M +/- Trump voters that she, in exposing her case prep, will not tip her hand, thereby allowing Respondent's counsel(s) to craft a strategy to damage or completely undermine the layers of her case?

Third, a smart lawyer will always taylor the message (market the issue) to the intended audience, which in the these matters happens to be Trump supporters. Hence the use of biblical verse, meme, and action oriented catch phrases. The Law is not only a chess game it is a theatrical performance and the better lawyer ALWAYS wins.

Will each be adjudicated before the electoral college deadline? Certainly not. The end game is to prevent the States from certifying the vote thereby thrusting the election into the House, where the GOP has a clear advantage in the one state/ one vote constitutional process. That gets DJT back at the helm where DOJ and the plethora of Civil cases can be allowed to wind through the Courts without the crippling weight of highly condensed time frames.

Hope that helps to answer your question.