Many people in big tech worship Satan. I'm actually on friendly terms with Satan. I don't worship him. He worships me with his ritual of jealousy. I feel a little bad for him, sometimes we talk a little. He as an angel who turned out not worthy gets the humans who turned out much the same.
Anyway we both have an evil streak. The problem is I see the possibilities but have extensive freewill including the ability to deprive myself of it when its wrong where as his is more limited. I am very careful not to open his eyes too much.
The thing is if I were big tech I wouldn't be censoring any case of people raising the possibility of fraud (or any other form of error) and such. I've worked a lot in big tech and had the same kind of struggle with the disproportionate power it gives, the man with the whip.
This is what I'd actually do. I'd let any content fly that makes the most out of the least. I would really mostly apply this censorship to accusations, suspicions, suppositions, whatever of fraud that are the most credible. Then I'd strangle anyone talking reason enough or basically I'd be monitoring statistics to see who turns people around the most as well but not also numbers but who matters like who is reasonably minded. We don't waste time on people who are easily swayed as we can always steer them back with next to nothing or even less than nothing.
Also they're stupid to post a blog post saying actually we're evil. They know already they can get away with anything so why even bother? Disclosure or not they still work in mysterious ways. Their cargo cult attempt at reaching godhood.
Many people in big tech worship Satan. I'm actually on friendly terms with Satan. I don't worship him. He worships me with his ritual of jealousy. I feel a little bad for him, sometimes we talk a little. He as an angel who turned out not worthy gets the humans who turned out much the same.
Anyway we both have an evil streak. The problem is I see the possibilities but have extensive freewill where as his is more limited. I am very careful not to open his eyes too much.
The thing is if I were big tech I wouldn't be censoring any case of people raising the possibility of fraud (or any other form of error) and such. I've worked a lot in big tech and had the same kind of struggle with the disproportionate power it gives, the man with the whip.
This is what I'd actually do. I'd let any content fly that makes the most out of the least. I would really mostly apply this censorship to accusations, suspicions, suppositions, whatever of fraud that are the most credible. Then I'd strangle anyone talking reason enough or basically I'd be monitoring statistics to see who turns people around the most as well but not also numbers but who matters like who is reasonably minded. We don't waste time on people who are easily swayed as we can always steer them back with next to nothing or even less than nothing.
Also they're stupid to post a blog post saying actually we're evil. They know already they can get away with anything so why even bother? Disclosure or not they still work in mysterious ways. Their cargo cult attempt at reaching godhood.