Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES Front All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I enjoy reading the historic laws and court cases. Sometimes I learn some interesting things. Dred Scott was far worse than I thought; it said that even free black people couldn't be US citizens. Brown v. Board contains a really malicious legal theory of integration that most people don't know about. And Deprivation of Rights applies to prosecutors and judges, not just police officers like you might have thought.

There was also an interesting test case about military tribunals, right after our first Civil War. The Supreme Court decided that military tribunals could try civilians within the occupied states only if there were no functioning courts.

Given the failures of both state and federal courts during this ridiculously corrupt vote counting process, it seems that Trump could declare certain areas to be without functioning courts. That would justify holding military tribunals on US soil, making the Insurrection Act much easier to enforce.

71 days ago
6 score
Reason: None provided.

I enjoy reading the historic laws and court cases. Sometimes I learn some interesting things. Dred Scott was far worse than I thought; it said that even free black people couldn't be US citizens. Brown v. Board contains a really malicious legal theory of integration that most people don't know about. And Deprivation of Rights applies to prosecutors and judges, not just police officers like you might have thought.

There was also an interesting test case about military tribunals, right after our first Civil War. The Supreme Court decided that military tribunals could try civilians within the occupied states only if there were no functioning courts.

Given the failures of both state and federal courts during this ridiculously corrupt vote counting process, it seems that Trump could declare certain areas to be without functioning courts. That would justify holding military tribunals on US soil, making the Insurrection Act much easier to enforce.

I wish there were someone I could inform about this, because time has been of the essence since December 11. That was the day of infamy when the US Supreme Court gave away the last of their Constitutional authority to Chinese interests and their pathetic American whores. I can't possibly respect their opinion on anything again.

71 days ago
4 score
Reason: Original

I enjoy reading some of the historic laws and court cases. Dred Scott was far worse than I thought; it said that even free black people couldn't be US citizens. Brown v. Board contains a really malicious legal theory of integration that most people don't know about. And Deprivation of Rights applies to prosecutors and judges, not just police officers like you might have thought.

There was also an interesting test case about military tribunals, right after our first Civil War. The Supreme Court decided that military tribunals could try civilians within the occupied states only if there were no functioning courts.

Given the failures of both state and federal courts during this ridiculously corrupt vote counting process, it seems that Trump could declare certain areas to be without functioning courts. That would justify holding military tribunals on US soil, making the Insurrection Act much easier to enforce.

I wish there were someone I could inform about this, because time has been of the essence since December 11. That was the day of infamy when the US Supreme Court gave away our Constitution to Chinese interests and their pathetic American whores. I can't possibly respect their opinion on anything again.

71 days ago
1 score