If they say "I'm an athiest because believers cant show me evidence god exists" then all you have to say is "show me evidence god doesnt exist" and they have equally as little evidence.

That means athiests are believers, they just dont believe in God. They are equally if not more religious in my opinion.

Anyone seeing where I'm going here and wants to throw in their two cents?

If most athiests used the same standards they use to argue with believers, then by those same standards, they shouldnt be athiests in the same way I'm not a feminist. I can care about women and not be a feminist. If they need proof god exists to be a believer and there is none, then they should need proof to prove god doesnt exist to be athiest. They have nothing. Meaning that they are hypocritical. They shouldnt be athiests either by their own standards, yet many of them are. It's like saying "I drive blue cars because I dont like people who drive red cars eventhough there is no proof of which color is better or worse"

That being said, I thank god for saving me and not letting me turn into a rotten commie

If they say "I'm an athiest because believers cant show me evidence god exists" then all you have to say is "show me evidence god doesnt exist" and they have equally as little evidence.

That means athiests are believers, they just dont believe in God. They are equally if not more religious in my opinion.

Anyone seeing where I'm going here and wants to throw in their two cents?