1
11001011000011101 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hold on to you ass, pede. Letters arranged into dangerous combinations ahead! But yeah, he wrote a book called "We're Doomed". Not altogether horrible book. Some parts were interesting and you'd not find them anywhere else between two hard covers.

1
11001011000011101 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mmm. Not so much. That's just another echo chamber. Something like r/TopMindsofReddit, though....

Thanks for the suggestion, though. Me n my chaffed vag will sleep better tonight.

4
11001011000011101 4 points ago +4 / -0

Jeez. When water cooler discussion takes a turn for the worse.

1
11001011000011101 1 point ago +1 / -0

Huge list of promising town that are in swing states and are pro-Trump. That's what I'm looking at, right? Seems good to me, not sure who you pissed off, or why there's so much negativity here. Maybe formatting it better in the future? I dunno. *ducks*

3
11001011000011101 3 points ago +3 / -0

Emailed you.

I like the post here mentioning Hillsdale in Michagan. In your post, which I'd only glanced over before, sorry, I didn't see any mention of conservative colleges.

They exist! Here's ONE website about that: https://www.princetonreview.com/college-rankings?rankings=most-conservative-students

Of course the downside is they may be 'conservative' and GWB supporting RW'ers and maybe not that 'secret sauce' / 'sweet spot' or whatever you're talking about demographic psychogeographic place you're looking for? Good luck, as I said...sometimes you have to not rely on your surroundings and create your own personal scene?

3
11001011000011101 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thought I saw a post about him. Then it disappeared?

Maybe my eyes are playing tricks on me?

3
11001011000011101 3 points ago +3 / -0

wish me luck!

Good luck!

They just want us all to be "Nazis" and George Bush supporters. Any evidence or website or post to the contrary is denied (censored), degraded (flooded with black propaganda look-alikes that water down message), disrupted (engaged with hostile actors to scare away from speaking), deceived (engaged with friendly actors to lead astray), or destroyed (take a guess)...

These idiots would rather destroy the country than admit a friendly, creative New Right that exists. They took the Alt-Right name that applied to this movement and stuck it on a bunch of racist neo-Nazis and feed them oxygen and made them famous and powerful...all to save face about miscalling an election. All so they could deny they made a misstep and didn't see us.

These MSM idiots are fucking dangerous boobs. Overpaid degenerate assholes who will never admit when they're wrong. They'll take this country down the road to Hell just to avoid asking themselves hard question about first causes.

2
11001011000011101 2 points ago +2 / -0

From your friendly mole, Bruce Sterling. In no way a part of the metapolitical army. Uhhh...

4
11001011000011101 4 points ago +4 / -0

Good luck, shill.

Deny, degrade, disrupt, deceive, or destroy, amirite?

Disinformation is false information spread deliberately to deceive. This is a subset of misinformation, which also may be unintentional.

The English word disinformation is a loan translation of the Russian dezinformatsiya, derived from the title of a KGB black propaganda department. Joseph Stalin coined the term, giving it a French-sounding name to claim it had a Western origin. Russian use began with a "special disinformation office" in 1923. Disinformation was defined in Great Soviet Encyclopedia (1952) as "false information with the intention to deceive public opinion". Operation INFEKTION was a Soviet disinformation campaign to influence opinion that the U.S. invented AIDS. The U.S. did not actively counter disinformation until 1980, when a fake document reported that the U.S. supported apartheid.

The word disinformation did not appear in English dictionaries until the late-1980s. English use increased in 1986, after revelations that the Reagan Administration engaged in disinformation against Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. By 1990, it was pervasive in U.S. politics; and by 2001 referred generally to lying and propaganda. In 2019, a national media figure, Chuck Todd, openly acknowledged that media had been manipulated by disinformation from the Trump administration, but a journalism project associated with New York University, PressThink, asserted that professional negligence was the root cause of the disinformation not having been addressed adequately.

2
11001011000011101 2 points ago +3 / -1

Information warfare (IW) is a concept involving the battlespace use and management of information and communication technology (ICT) in pursuit of a competitive advantage over an opponent. Information warfare is the manipulation of information trusted by a target without the target's awareness so that the target will make decisions against their interest but in the interest of the one conducting information warfare. As a result, it is not clear when information warfare begins, ends, and how strong or destructive it is.[1] Information warfare may involve the collection of tactical information, assurance(s) that one's own information is valid, spreading of propaganda or disinformation to demoralize or manipulate [2] the enemy and the public, undermining the quality of the opposing force's information and denial of information-collection opportunities to opposing forces. Information warfare is closely linked to psychological warfare.[3]

The United States military focus tends to favor technology, and hence tends to extend into the realms of electronic warfare, cyberwarfare, information assurance and computer network operations, attack and defense.

Most of the rest of the world use the much broader term of "Information Operations" which, although making use of technology, focuses on the more human-related aspects of information use, including (amongst many others) social network analysis, decision analysis and the human aspects of command and control.