I love that about this board. I know there are pedes that don’t believe, and we are about freedom of religion as well. But if anyone of you that don’t believe, but are curious, there are tons of us brothers and sisters in Christ that would be more than happy to tell you all about it!
The one hope I have is so many autistic pedes will be watching poll watchers, following operatives, etc. the pessimistic part of me says they’ll claim “muh nazis influencing poor innocent poll workers and muh call to action”.
Don’t be surprised if the left stations nat guard outside and everything in the poll areas becomes the man behind the curtain routine.
Didn’t they freak out when trump yanked acosta pass for grabbing at that girl that had the microphone? That was one reporter, far as I know, msnbc, abc, and all the other liberals got to keep theirs.
Lifelong politicians are the Pharisees of our times.
Lol The finished result is obviously not compassionate in any religious sense. Compassion is the gateway Trojan horse that women first buy into feminism.
However, it’s almost as if feminism is designed for destabilizing a traditional religious household.
The white liberal woman is the weak point of western civilization. The reason you still see so much virtue signaling is because it works on them because it’s in a woman’s nature to be compassionate.
It locks in its plan with the projection of the toxic masculinity white male because the weak point of the white liberal woman is her ego. She swallows up the feminist lie, thinks it’s her duty to protect other women and that leads her to attack those closest to her. Wrap it up with the marinade of sin, coveting(ie communism) and you have a nasty provocateur.
It’s a horrible lie because it leaves a hateful old hag that no one wants anything to do with.
That was actually a very thoughtful, well spoken response and I thank you for that. That’s why I’m not of the mindset that all Catholics blindly follow the pope and treat anything he says as cannon.
I’ve met plenty of Catholics in my life that whenever a conversation of faith arises they are ultimately true to Christ. My position isn’t one to throw rocks at the church and it’s followers, it’s more distain whenever a pope shares an opinion directly contradicting the Bible and teachings of Christ.
No. Following Christ also includes a great deal of respect for the apostles and the early Catholic Church. What I am saying is the pope isn’t representing what would be considered fundamental Catholic teachings.
Also, don’t call Martin Luther some “lecherous guy”, millions of Protestants would disagree with you. Truth be told, the most important thing with my relation to other Christians(that includes Catholics) is that they’ve accepted Christ as their savior and are practicing his teachings.
Anything with humans will be fallible. I know plenty of good people that are Catholics that stick to the principles of Christ. The problem is when a church official “virtue-signals”, (this can be a Protestant church that has rainbow flags too btw), it deviates from what Christianity is actually about.
I don’t want someone to go to a Catholic Church thinking abortion is ok and then getting them done because the pope said it was ok and then they get thrown in hell when they die.
“Whatever you hold true on earth” does not mean, compromise commandments to win popularity points with people that don’t believe in God anyways.
I’d rather get covid then be a cuck with no spine.