7
1787_1789 7 points ago +7 / -0

Remember, get every single one you find over to the Trump legal team. Even if it's only a couple of names, that's enough for a wider audit (or canvas) of the ballots.

by renz0t
1
1787_1789 1 point ago +1 / -0

This was what Rich Baris from People's Pundit mentioned during Eric Hunley's interview of him on his show, check it out:https://youtu.be/msbFg20-YjM?t=1001

2
1787_1789 2 points ago +2 / -0

From what I understand, PA's Supreme Court made that decision for themselves and it was appealed up to the SCOTUS where Roberts fucked everyone by siding with the lib judges and sent it back down again since the court was 8 (4-4) at the time. I could be misremembering my facts (and I apologize in advance if I am) but I'm pretty confident that Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh knew this would be a shit-show but Roberts cucked out again. ACB could have been the deciding vote to prevent all of this but "wasn't ready" or some shit (sigh).

It will, eventually, go back to the courts and at that point, depending on ACB, all they would really have to do (and the path with the least amount of potential resistance for the Trump team) is, theoretically, determine the outcome of questionable ballots introduced passed the deadline, giving Trump the victory in at least 3 rust-belt states. Even if you couldn't determine which ballots those were (because of improper handling or record-keeping, confirmation or even allegations of backdating, mixing them in purposefully, etc) you could go the exspoliation route and nullify all ballots counted and tabulated passed 11:59pm, which would give Trump a victory in NC, GA, WI, MI, and PA (this is partly why the case on Monday will be filed in Federal court and will be eventually expanded to include all of the states in-question, in order to have a uniform and timely outcome).

This is also why you're hearing A LOT of talk about observation from Trump's team across all of the states and even from Trump himself. This is the MOST settled case-law thus far and the issue containing the most indisputable and incontrovertible evidence to date, even before the discovery process is undertaken on the ballots themselves during subsequent canvasing (auditing) of said ballots; which will almost assuredly uncover its own litany of issues that won't be able to be ignored. The Trump team has 100 witnesses in MI, 60 in PA, and sworn affidavits from poll workers, observers, and USPS workers in just about every state at this point. Even besides all of that, SCOTUS is just one of many steps, set up by the very forward-thinking founding fathers, available to Trump on the path to victory.

36
1787_1789 36 points ago +36 / -0

It's amusing to see people attempt to capitulate to the mob in exchange for "peace." They point to their "woke" points, their Biden-Harris signs to show their "loyalty," thinking like it's lambs blood during the passover. What they don't realize is that the mob is never satiated, it is perpetually ravenous and that "liberals get the bullet too."

2
1787_1789 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, and if you remember North Carolina Dems got one with a fraction of the alleged fraud we see here. BUT, it's NEVER happened before for the General Presidential Election. This would be a first, but it is possible. Collect all evidence, we're gonna need it.

6
1787_1789 6 points ago +6 / -0

Precisely, yes! Thank you, Pede!

61
1787_1789 61 points ago +61 / -0

They might be working under the same BS as in Georgia, go out physically canvassing attempting to "cure" ballots with voters at their residences. Fraud right out in the fucking open. THE ELECTION IS NOVEMBER 3RD, PERIOD. Once votes are in, they're in and that's the end of it, counting must take place in-front of observers and if it takes longer, so be it, but you can't just dump ballots received AFTER election day, and you sure as fuck CANNOT "cure" or canvas for more ballots if your candidate is losing. This whole thing is fucked and I'd be making the case right now for a potential REVOTE in key swing states (Michigan, Wisconsin, Philadelphia, North Carolina, Georgia, and potentially Arizona, Nevada, and Minnesota).

8
1787_1789 8 points ago +8 / -0

I gotcha. The stream goes into many of them so I would skip back to about 7:30 when Barnes comes on and start there. If you need exact statistical data, I can help anyway I can to get it to you. Here's what you can chew on right now:

Milwaukee Wards vs Voter Turnout: Ward 274 - 202%! Ward 273 - 201%! Ward 272 - 125% Ward 277 - 117% Ward 269 - 115% Ward 234 - 108% Ward 312 - 101%

RealClearPolitics is reporting that Wisconsin is reporting a 105% voter turnout for the entire state when compared to total votes cast (3,289,421[Vs] compared to 3,129,000[RVs as reported by RCP] = 105.12690955576862%). What I would do is try to find an accurate voter registration amount that was last updated by the time the polls closed and cross reference that with the amount of votes cast. I'm sure the election commission and other institutions are doing this actively but it doesn't hurt to do it yourself.

From The Daily Cardinal:

The record for most votes ever cast in Wisconsin for a presidential election came in 2012 with a total of 3,080,628. For the 2020 election, the Elections Commission reported 3,684,726 registered voters as of Nov. 1, which means that Wisconsin could break its previous record by over 600,00 votes. In terms of turnout rate, Wisconsin set its current record during the 2004 presidential election when 73.24 percent of eligible voters cast their ballots. Around 3.3 million Wisconsin voters would need to cast their ballots in 2020 to eclipse that mark. The almost two million absentee ballots cast represents 51 percent of Wisconsin’s registered voters.

The actual count final count at 99% reporting: 3,289,421

If you can find out how many absentee ballots were tabulated versus how many of them were actually requested, that would also be an indicator.

The abnormally historically high voter turnout that I quoted earlier (the 89% figure), might be wrong but I'm still investigating. Apparently, Wisconsin uses a different formula to determine voter turnout than people were initially calculating (votes divided by citizens of voting age, NOT registered voters), so the numbers might be in-line with historical trends but I'm still evaluating.

The last metric is that Wisconsin tabulated or "found" 140,000 ballots during the hours of 3:30am and 4:30am and not a single one went to Trump. Perhaps a fluke or an input error, on might say? Until you consider that the same thing happened, almost at the exact same time with the two other rust-belt states:

Michigan: 3:30-5am, 200k ballots, Pennsylvania: 2am-4am, almost 1m

Again, not a SINGLE one for Trump.

We have more evidence of potential fraud for both those aforementioned states, but the amount of irregularities in Wisconsin alone make it all highly suspect.

23
1787_1789 23 points ago +23 / -0

It's possible and is noted by Barnes on the stream, the issue is with the likelihood and propensity. It's usually very unlikely to happen at all if it does, but 7 wards? Not a chance as it's simply a statistical impossibility. Consider also that Wisconsin had 89% voter turnout in a state that's historically averaged in the mid 60's, and never going over 78% percent in the last 60 years. Milwaukee has higher black turnout (by a lot mind you) than almost every city in America and is even higher there than it was with Obama?

Even if you were to accept any one of those irregularities, one simply cannot accept them together (think of a circumstantial murder case involving the totality but with even better evidence). Putting all of it together creates a clear picture of what went on here.

1
1787_1789 1 point ago +2 / -1

No dooming here, I'm calling all to NEVER give up, keep fighting, call your Senators and Congressman and tell them you will NEVER accept any result unless it's for Trump, one way or another.

1
1787_1789 1 point ago +1 / -0

I typed this out earlier:

Arizona stopped counting last night, and when Fox called the state, only 75% of the vote was in (almost all from early and mail-in ballots). He needs to get at least 63% of the remaining votes (mostly from Maricopa county) to go his way and he was on pace to do that before they stopped counting last night at around 84%

Additionally, from @Garrett_Archer on Twitter:

[email protected] won Election day in Arizona 65% to @JoeBiden's 34%.

Watch the video below starting at 1:40:52, People's Pundit does the entire breakdown on why Arizona will go for Trump, it'll be a margin of anywhere from 10K to 30K:

https://youtu.be/z8qK2FrMIZ8

TL;DR, it'll be by about a smurf's ass hair but, depending the outcome of the #sharpygate scandal, GEOTUS is on-pace, as of right now, to win Arizona.

2
1787_1789 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was only able to get a screenshot, but in it, I was able to capture the tweet, the tweeter, the instagrammer, in the text in question. I'm trying to do all I can while mobile. Unfortunately, I had to take somebody to the hospital so I can't properly archive right now. :(

6
1787_1789 6 points ago +6 / -0

Make sure we archive these videos, Pedes!!!! They're taking tweets down one by one, type in "Twitter video downloader" into your preferred search engine and it should be the first result. We need to start collecting evidence at this point.

2
1787_1789 2 points ago +2 / -0

Unfortunately these are state level charges still, Trump doesn't have any say whatsoever, from what I understand.

2
1787_1789 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wish I could say I caught one from GEOTUS, mine was thrown by someone from the campaign staff. It's okay though; to get one at all was phenomenal enough as it's the only thing I've ever wanted as a fan of the President and was initially disappointed that they weren't actually selling them in the venue. IT WAS AWESOME!!!!

2
1787_1789 2 points ago +2 / -0

When Cosmopolitan is soundly debunking leftist bullshit with absolute ease, you know you're fucking retarded:

https://www.cosmopolitan.com/politics/a34480399/fake-melania-trump-conspiracy-theory/

2
1787_1789 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm so hot I'm sweating.... from Making America Great Again!

2
1787_1789 2 points ago +2 / -0

Had to look that one up LOL. Fantastic historical reference, pede!!!

1
1787_1789 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is an interview Lil Wayne did on the show Undisputed 4 YEARS AGO about BLM, Racism in America, etc... It's like a based Trump supporter in the making:

https://youtu.be/-PBf_H3z63A

30
1787_1789 30 points ago +31 / -1

Stickied!!!!!!!! THANK YOU MODS!!!!!!!!!!

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›